Peigh Graham, Al-Kazaz Mohamed, Davidson Laura J, Gerçek Muhammed, Potratz Max, Malaisrie S Christopher, Finke Rachel, Meng Zhiying, Baldridge Abigail S, Gao Jing, Magod Benjamin, Attinoto Alexis, Narang Akhil, Puthumana Jyothy J, Lee Linda, Adam Matti, Althoff Jan, Cremer Paul, Passman Rod S, Körber Maria Isabel, Knight Bradley P, Lin Albert C, Rudolph Volker, Davidson Charles J
Division of Cardiology, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/GrahamPeigh.
Division of Cardiology, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Jul 28;18(14):1762-1772. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2025.05.042.
In patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) using a transvenous right ventricular (RV) lead, transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR) results in RV lead entrapment.
The authors sought to evaluate outcomes of patients with pre-existing transvenous RV leads undergoing EVOQUE TTVR.
Patients with a CIED referred for TTVR at 3 centers were evaluated preoperatively by the heart team. Lead and clinical assessments were performed at baseline and in follow-up per local clinical practice. The primary outcome was the nature and incidence of major lead-related complications after TTVR. Secondary outcomes included changes in lead parameters after entrapment.
Of 146 EVOQUE TTVR, 52 consecutive patients with entrapped RV leads (age 81 [77-85] years; 33 female patients (63.5%), lead dwell time 8.9 [3.3-13.6] years) were evaluated. Paravalvular leak was mild or less in 47 of 48 patients (98%) 30 days post-TTVR. Four patients had procedure-related lead complications: 1 intraprocedural RV lead dislodgement; 2 implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead fractures 6- and 8-weeks post-TTVR; and 1 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis 1 month post-TTVR. Among 46 complication-free patients with follow-up >30 days (356 [196-965] days), there were no other lead-related adverse events. Of the 33 patients without complications who had ≥1 CIED interrogation >30 days (424 [182-1,006] days) following TTVR, there was a significant decrease in lead impedance and increase in capture threshold on the final lead assessment, but no additional patients required lead revision.
Following TTVR, most with entrapped RV leads remain free of lead-related complications. The need for urgent CIED revision due to RV lead dislodgment or failure is uncommon but may occur.
在使用经静脉右心室(RV)导线的心脏植入式电子设备(CIED)患者中,经导管三尖瓣置换术(TTVR)会导致RV导线陷入。
作者旨在评估已有经静脉RV导线的患者接受EVOQUE TTVR的结局。
在3个中心因TTVR而转诊的CIED患者在术前由心脏团队进行评估。根据当地临床实践在基线和随访时进行导线和临床评估。主要结局是TTVR后主要导线相关并发症的性质和发生率。次要结局包括导线陷入后导线参数的变化。
在146例EVOQUE TTVR中,对52例连续的RV导线陷入患者(年龄81 [77 - 85]岁;33例女性患者(63.5%),导线植入时间8.9 [3.3 - 13.6]年)进行了评估。48例患者中有47例(98%)在TTVR后30天瓣周漏为轻度或更低。4例患者发生了与手术相关的导线并发症:1例术中RV导线脱位;2例在TTVR后6周和8周发生植入式心律转复除颤器导线骨折;1例在TTVR后1个月发生耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌心内膜炎。在46例随访超过30天(356 [196 - 965]天)且无并发症的患者中,没有其他与导线相关的不良事件。在33例无并发症且TTVR后≥1次CIED程控超过30天(424 [182 - 1,006]天)的患者中,最终导线评估时导线阻抗显著降低,捕捉阈值升高,但没有额外患者需要导线修订。
TTVR后,大多数RV导线陷入患者无导线相关并发症。因RV导线脱位或故障而急需CIED修订的情况不常见,但可能会发生。