• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

建立临床研究中的信任:一种实现道德参与和可持续成果的系统方法。

Building trust in clinical research: a systems approach to ethical engagement and sustainable outcomes.

作者信息

Blom Johanna M C, Rivi Veronica, Tascedda Fabio, Pani Luca

机构信息

Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.

Center for Neuroscience and Neurotechnology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.

出版信息

Front Pharmacol. 2025 Jul 16;16:1570899. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1570899. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fphar.2025.1570899
PMID:40741004
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12307415/
Abstract

Trust and trustworthiness are critical to the success of clinical research, profoundly influencing participant engagement, data integrity, and study outcomes. These behaviors emerge from complex, dynamic interactions within the clinical research ecosystem, involving stakeholders such as sponsors, participants, clinicians, researchers, and regulatory bodies. The rapid development of COVID-19 vaccines has underscored the potential of scientific advancements to build public trust in the scientific outcomes, while also exposing vulnerabilities in the procedural trust framework due to misinformation and historical unethical practices. This paper explores trust and trustworthiness as emergent properties within the complex systems of clinical research, highlighting their evolution through transparent communication, participant empowerment, and ethical governance. A systems approach is emphasized, where trust develops holistically, influenced by regulatory frameworks, interpersonal relationships, and the overall research environment. Practical implications include the adoption of adaptive consent models, interdisciplinary collaboration, and the integration of continuous feedback mechanisms. To address trust erosion, especially among marginalized communities, we advocate for participatory research approaches and the development of new professional competencies, such as the role of a Clinical Research Liaison. This role would ensure ongoing alignment with community needs, enhance transparency, and maintain ethical standards, ultimately fostering a research environment where trust and trustworthiness thrive, benefiting both participants and the broader scientific community. A roadmap for future efforts includes the systematic incorporation of these elements into clinical research practices to enhance trust and improve research outcomes.

摘要

信任和可信赖性对于临床研究的成功至关重要,深刻影响着参与者的参与度、数据完整性和研究结果。这些行为源自临床研究生态系统内复杂、动态的互动,涉及赞助商、参与者、临床医生、研究人员和监管机构等利益相关者。新冠疫苗的迅速研发凸显了科学进步建立公众对科学成果信任的潜力,同时也因错误信息和历史上的不道德行为暴露了程序信任框架中的脆弱性。本文探讨信任和可信赖性作为临床研究复杂系统中的新兴属性,强调它们通过透明沟通、参与者赋权和道德治理的演变。强调采用系统方法,信任在监管框架、人际关系和整体研究环境的影响下全面发展。实际影响包括采用适应性同意模型、跨学科合作以及整合持续反馈机制。为解决信任侵蚀问题,尤其是在边缘化社区中,我们倡导采用参与式研究方法并发展新的专业能力,如临床研究联络官的角色。这一角色将确保与社区需求持续保持一致,提高透明度并维持道德标准,最终营造一个信任和可信赖性蓬勃发展的研究环境,使参与者和更广泛的科学界都受益。未来努力的路线图包括将这些要素系统地纳入临床研究实践,以增强信任并改善研究结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/987e/12307415/1f86e684dbe1/fphar-16-1570899-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/987e/12307415/1f86e684dbe1/fphar-16-1570899-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/987e/12307415/1f86e684dbe1/fphar-16-1570899-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Building trust in clinical research: a systems approach to ethical engagement and sustainable outcomes.建立临床研究中的信任:一种实现道德参与和可持续成果的系统方法。
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Jul 16;16:1570899. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1570899. eCollection 2025.
2
Accreditation through the eyes of nurse managers: an infinite staircase or a phenomenon that evaporates like water.护士长眼中的认证:是无尽的阶梯还是如流水般消逝的现象。
J Health Organ Manag. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2025-0029.
3
Hail Lifestyle Medicine consensus position statement as a medical specialty: Middle Eastern perspective.欢呼将生活方式医学作为一门医学专业的共识立场声明:中东视角。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 20;13:1455871. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1455871. eCollection 2025.
4
Trust, Trustworthiness, and the Future of Medical AI: Outcomes of an Interdisciplinary Expert Workshop.信任、可信度与医学人工智能的未来:跨学科专家研讨会成果
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 2;27:e71236. doi: 10.2196/71236.
5
Responsible research impact: Ethics for making a difference.负责任的研究影响:创造改变的伦理准则。
Open Res Eur. 2025 Mar 31;5:92. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.19649.1. eCollection 2025.
6
Increasing community members' engagement in cancer research: the making research CLEAR program.提高社区成员对癌症研究的参与度:“让研究清晰明了”项目
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Jun 19;11(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00741-z.
7
Creating the conditions for meaningful and effective PPIE in community-based public health research: learning from a UK-wide lived experience panel.为基于社区的公共卫生研究中开展有意义且有效的公众及患者参与、介入与合作创造条件:借鉴全英生活经历小组的经验
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Jul 17;11(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00727-x.
8
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
9
Management of urinary stones by experts in stone disease (ESD 2025).结石病专家对尿路结石的管理(2025年结石病专家共识)
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2025 Jun 30;97(2):14085. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2025.14085.
10
Wood Waste Valorization and Classification Approaches: A systematic review.木材废料的增值与分类方法:一项系统综述
Open Res Eur. 2025 May 6;5:5. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.18862.1. eCollection 2025.

引用本文的文献

1
Cooking for disability: a pilot study on nutritional interventions for mental health support in adults with autism spectrum disorder.为残障人士烹饪:一项针对自闭症谱系障碍成年人心理健康支持的营养干预试点研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Aug 19;16:1608033. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1608033. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Interventions for combating COVID-19 misinformation: A systematic realist review.对抗新冠疫情错误信息的干预措施:一项系统现实主义综述
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 24;20(4):e0321818. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321818. eCollection 2025.
2
Research protocol for bridging research, accurate information and dialogue (BRAID)-clinical trials: a mixed-methods study of a community-based intervention to improve trust and diversify participation in clinical trials.桥接研究、准确信息和对话(BRAID)临床试验研究方案:一项基于社区的干预措施改善临床试验中信任和多样化参与的混合方法研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 Sep 16;12:1407726. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1407726. eCollection 2024.
3
Ethical framework for FACILITATE: a foundation for the return of clinical trial data to participants.
促进临床试验数据返还参与者的伦理框架:基础
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jul 17;11:1408600. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1408600. eCollection 2024.
4
How to Design Consent for Health Data Research? An Analysis of Arguments of Solidarity.如何设计健康数据研究的同意书?对团结论点的分析。
Public Health Ethics. 2023 Dec 12;16(3):261-270. doi: 10.1093/phe/phad025. eCollection 2023 Nov.
5
A narrative journey into the borderland of patient safety: Toward an expanded, relational concept of safety.一次踏入患者安全边缘地带的叙事之旅:迈向一个更广泛的、基于关系的安全概念。
Qual Res Med Healthc. 2024 Jan 16;7(3):11496. doi: 10.4081/qrmh.2023.11496. eCollection 2023 Dec 4.
6
Education and training of clinical research professionals and the evolution of the Joint Task Force for Clinical Trial Competency.临床研究专业人员的教育与培训以及临床试验能力联合工作组的演变
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Jan 18;15:1291675. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1291675. eCollection 2024.
7
Patient engagement in designing, conducting, and disseminating clinical pain research: IMMPACT recommended considerations.患者参与临床疼痛研究的设计、实施和传播:IMMPACT推荐的考量因素。
Pain. 2024 May 1;165(5):1013-1028. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003121. Epub 2023 Dec 19.
8
Reflections and key learnings on the .关于……的思考与关键收获
J Commun Healthc. 2023 Dec;16(4):315-319. doi: 10.1080/17538068.2023.2281731. Epub 2023 Dec 14.
9
What influences trust in and understanding of clinical trials? An analysis of information and communication technology use and online health behavior from the Health Information National Trends Survey.哪些因素会影响对临床试验的信任和理解?基于健康信息国家趋势调查对信息通信技术使用情况和在线健康行为的分析。
Clin Trials. 2024 Feb;21(1):95-113. doi: 10.1177/17407745231204813. Epub 2023 Oct 31.
10
The nexus of social alliances and diverse moral domains: a bedrock for participatory clinical research.社会联盟与多元道德领域的联系:参与性临床研究的基石
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Oct 2;10:1250247. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1250247. eCollection 2023.