Jensen Eric Allen, Reed Mark S, Daybell James, Rutt Louise, Jensen Aaron M, Arrigoni Gabriella, Ballesteros Marta, Bhanbhro Sadiq, Merkle Bethann G, Hafferty Caitlin, Iglehart Philly, Khuri Sawsan, Klimczuk Andrzej, Marder Ian D, Milosavljevic Daniel, Pacheco-Mendoza Josmel, Pool Ursula, Robinson Simon, Stringer Lindsay C, Taylor Steve, Toomey Anne H, Martin Daniela, Taylor-Sayles Lisa Louise, Makohon-George Andrew N, Rodrigo Russell T
Institute for Methods Innovation, Dublin, D02 XE80, Ireland.
Natural Capital Challenge Centre, Scotland's Rural College (SRUC), Edinburgh, EH9 3JG, UK.
Open Res Eur. 2025 Mar 31;5:92. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.19649.1. eCollection 2025.
The need for ethical guidelines that support and empower researchers who aim to enhance the societal impact of research has become critical. Recognizing the growing emphasis on research impact by governments and funding bodies worldwide, this article investigates the often overlooked ethical dimensions of generating and evaluating research impact. We focus on ethical issues and practices that are specific to the process of intentionally working to develop societal impacts from research. We highlight the complexities and ethical dilemmas encountered when researchers engage with non-academic groups, such as policymakers, industries, and local communities. Through a combination of literature review and insights from participatory workshops, the article identifies key issues and offers a new ethical framework for responsible research impact. This framework aims to guide researchers and institutions through the process of limiting potential harm while delivering societal benefits in a way that is realistic and balanced. The aim is to establish ethical practices for engagement and impact, without making the process so onerous that researchers are less likely to undertake such activities. The article concludes with actionable recommendations for policymakers, research funders, research performing organizations, institutional review boards and/or ethics committees, and individual researchers. Making use of such recommendations can foster an ethically responsible approach to research impact across academic disciplines.
对于那些旨在提高研究的社会影响力的研究人员而言,制定支持并赋予他们权力的伦理准则变得至关重要。鉴于全球各国政府和资助机构日益重视研究影响力,本文探讨了在产生和评估研究影响力过程中常常被忽视的伦理维度。我们关注的是在有意致力于从研究中发展社会影响力的过程中所特有的伦理问题和实践。我们强调了研究人员与非学术团体(如政策制定者、行业和当地社区)互动时所遇到的复杂性和伦理困境。通过文献综述和参与式研讨会的见解相结合,本文确定了关键问题,并为负责任的研究影响力提供了一个新的伦理框架。该框架旨在指导研究人员和机构在限制潜在危害的同时,以现实和平衡的方式实现社会效益。目的是建立参与和影响力方面的伦理实践,而不会使过程过于繁琐,以至于研究人员不太可能开展此类活动。文章最后为政策制定者、研究资助者、研究执行组织、机构审查委员会和/或伦理委员会以及个体研究人员提供了可操作的建议。利用这些建议可以在各学科领域培养一种对研究影响力负责的伦理方法。