• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用DISCERN工具评估经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术(PELD)在线信息的质量

Evaluating the Quality of Online Information on Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy (PELD) Using the DISCERN Instrument.

作者信息

Tarantino Alessio, Buharaja Rodrigo, Aureli Alessandro, Basile Attilio, Tornatore Ignazio

机构信息

Orthopedics and Traumatology, Policlinico Casilino, Rome, ITA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2025 Jun 30;17(6):e87045. doi: 10.7759/cureus.87045. eCollection 2025 Jun.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.87045
PMID:40741565
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12310078/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) is a minimally invasive surgical procedure increasingly referenced in patient-oriented websites. However, the quality of such online health information is inconsistent. This study evaluates the quality of Italian-language web content on PELD using the DISCERN tool.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted on 25 May 2025 using the Italian-language interface of Google (Google LLC, Mountain View, California, United States) with the keywords "PELD," "discectomia endoscopica percutanea," and "ernia del disco PELD." Twenty websites targeted at the general public were selected. Each was independently assessed using the 16-item DISCERN instrument by two trained reviewers. Inter-rater reliability was calculated using Cohen's kappa coefficient.

RESULTS

The mean overall DISCERN score across the 20 websites was 39.5 (SD = 8.7) out of 80, indicating moderate-to-low quality. High-scoring domains included clarity of procedural explanation (mean = 4.2/5), while critical aspects such as citation of sources (mean = 2.1/5) and discussion of uncertainties (mean = 1.7/5) were underrepresented. Cohen's kappa was 0.82, indicating strong agreement between reviewers.

CONCLUSION

Online Italian-language resources on PELD exhibit moderate quality and frequently omit essential components such as treatment risks and alternative options. Enhancing transparency and evidence citation is essential to improve the quality of patient education materials.

摘要

引言

经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术(PELD)是一种微创手术,在面向患者的网站上越来越多地被提及。然而,此类在线健康信息的质量参差不齐。本研究使用DISCERN工具评估意大利语网页上关于PELD的内容质量。

方法

于2025年5月25日使用谷歌(谷歌有限责任公司,美国加利福尼亚州山景城)的意大利语界面,以“PELD”、“经皮内镜椎间盘切除术”和“PELD椎间盘突出症”为关键词进行系统搜索。选择了20个面向公众的网站。由两名经过培训的评审员使用16项DISCERN工具对每个网站进行独立评估。使用科恩kappa系数计算评分者间信度。

结果

20个网站的DISCERN总体平均得分在80分中为39.5分(标准差 = 8.7),表明质量为中低水平。高分领域包括手术解释的清晰度(平均 = 4.2/5),而诸如来源引用(平均 = 2.1/5)和不确定性讨论(平均 = 1.7/5)等关键方面则未得到充分体现。科恩kappa系数为0.82,表明评审员之间有很强的一致性。

结论

意大利语在线PELD资源质量中等,经常遗漏治疗风险和替代方案等重要内容。提高透明度和证据引用对于提高患者教育材料的质量至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96eb/12310078/ebb753f24def/cureus-0017-00000087045-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96eb/12310078/ebb753f24def/cureus-0017-00000087045-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96eb/12310078/ebb753f24def/cureus-0017-00000087045-i01.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating the Quality of Online Information on Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy (PELD) Using the DISCERN Instrument.使用DISCERN工具评估经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术(PELD)在线信息的质量
Cureus. 2025 Jun 30;17(6):e87045. doi: 10.7759/cureus.87045. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
3
Quality of Patient-Centered eHealth Information on Erosive Tooth Wear: Systematic Search and Evaluation of Websites and YouTube Videos.基于患者为中心的网站和 YouTube 视频中关于牙酸蚀症的电子健康信息质量:系统检索和评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jan 31;26:e49514. doi: 10.2196/49514.
4
Minimally invasive discectomy versus microdiscectomy/open discectomy for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation.微创椎间盘切除术与显微椎间盘切除术/开放椎间盘切除术治疗有症状的腰椎间盘突出症的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Sep 4;2014(9):CD010328. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010328.pub2.
5
Enhancing athletic performance: the critical role of oral health in sports.提升运动表现:口腔健康在体育运动中的关键作用。
Evid Based Dent. 2025 Jun;26(2):105-106. doi: 10.1038/s41432-025-01157-0. Epub 2025 May 13.
6
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
7
The Reliability Gap: How Traditional Search Engines Outperform Artificial Intelligence (AI) Chatbots in Rosacea Public Health Information Quality.可靠性差距:传统搜索引擎在酒渣鼻公共卫生信息质量方面如何优于人工智能(AI)聊天机器人。
Cureus. 2025 Jun 22;17(6):e86543. doi: 10.7759/cureus.86543. eCollection 2025 Jun.
8
The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.医疗机构内协作的测量:对测量工具属性的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):138-97. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2159.
9
Clinical guidelines and payer policies on fusion for the treatment of chronic low back pain.临床指南和支付方政策对慢性下腰痛融合治疗的影响。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Oct 1;36(21 Suppl):S144-63. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31822ef5b4.
10
Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for recurrent lumbar disc herniation.经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术治疗复发性腰椎间盘突出症
Int J Surg. 2016 Mar;27:8-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.01.034. Epub 2016 Jan 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness and Safety of Transforaminal Spinal Endoscopy: Analysis of 1000 Clinical Cases.经椎间孔脊柱内镜的有效性和安全性:1000例临床病例分析
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Apr 17;15(8):1021. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15081021.
2
Patients' perspectives on the quality of online patient education materials: A qualitative study.患者对在线患者教育材料质量的看法:一项定性研究。
J Educ Health Promot. 2022 Dec 28;11:402. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1127_21. eCollection 2022.
3
Online Health Information Seeking Behavior: A Systematic Review.
在线健康信息搜索行为:一项系统综述。
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Dec 16;9(12):1740. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9121740.
4
Stem Cells in Orthopedic Web Information: An Assessment with the DISCERN Tool.骨科网络信息中的干细胞:使用 DISCERN 工具进行评估。
Cartilage. 2021 Dec;13(1_suppl):519S-525S. doi: 10.1177/19476035211040161. Epub 2021 Aug 23.
5
Factors affecting the quality and reliability of online health information.影响在线健康信息质量和可靠性的因素。
Digit Health. 2020 Aug 30;6:2055207620948996. doi: 10.1177/2055207620948996. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
6
Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy: Indications and Complications.经皮内窥镜下腰椎间盘切除术:适应证和并发症。
Pain Physician. 2020 Jan;23(1):49-56.
7
Can Patients Trust Online Health Information? A Meta-narrative Systematic Review Addressing the Quality of Health Information on the Internet.患者能信任网上的健康信息吗?一项针对互联网健康信息质量的元叙述系统评价。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Sep;34(9):1884-1891. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05109-0. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
8
Low health literacy and evaluation of online health information: a systematic review of the literature.低健康素养与在线健康信息评估:文献系统综述
J Med Internet Res. 2015 May 7;17(5):e112. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4018.
9
DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices.DISCERN:一种用于评判关于治疗选择的书面消费者健康信息质量的工具。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999 Feb;53(2):105-11. doi: 10.1136/jech.53.2.105.
10
Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD).
Neurosurg Rev. 1993;16(2):115-20. doi: 10.1007/BF00258242.