Dittmer Anneke, da Costa Gouveia Tiago Leyser, Sivalingam Kantharuban, DeBeer Serena, Neese Frank, Maganas Dimitrios
Max-Planck-Institut für Kohlenforschung, Kaiser-Wilhelm-Platz 1, D-45470 Mülheim an der Ruhr, Germany.
FACCTs GmbH, Rolandstrasse 67, D-50677 Köln, Germany.
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2025 Aug 20;27(33):17225-17244. doi: 10.1039/d5cp01735a.
In this work, a systematic computational investigation of the optical band gap (BG) problem of CoO is carried out on the basis of the embedded cluster approach in combination with a series of particle/hole and wavefunction-based approaches. A total number of three experimental band gap energies for the bulk CoO have been reported in the literature, the nature of which have remained controversial. This work will show that accurately describing the excited states and rationalizing these experimental band gaps require explicit treatment and analysis of strong electron correlation effects. These correlation effects enable low-energy optical excitations to emerge from both 'neutral' and 'ionic' antiferromagnetic configurations, depending on how the electronic structure reorganizes across the coupled high-spin tetrahedral Co(II) (site A) and low-spin octahedral Co(III) (site B) centers. To disentangle the contributions from these two distinct sites, this work introduces reference systems, AlCo(II)O and Co(III)ZnO, which isolate the Co(II) and Co(II) sites, respectively. Tackling such a complex excited state problem requires going beyond density functional theory (DFT) particle/hole approaches and employing a range of single and multi-reference wavefunction based methods. In particular, complete active space configuration interaction self-consistent field (CASSCF) and its approximate CI variants in conjunction with 2nd order N-electron valence perturbation theory (NEVPT2) provide access to an accurate prediction of all three experimentally observed BG energies in CoO. Our calculations are consistent with the notion that the lowest energy band gap corresponds to the ligand field (LF) type of transitions within the local tetrahedral Co(II) centers. Furthermore, the calculations predict that the middle energy band gap is a mixture of LF transitions at site A and metal-to-metal charge transfer (MMCT) transition across A-A' and A-B/B-A' pairs. These transitions give rise to Co(I) and Co(III) configurations at site A, deviating from the original Co(II) based configurations. This intermediate band is assigned to the actual experimentally observed optical band gap of CoO. Finally, the highest energy band gap is again a mixture of LF transitions at site A and ligand-to-metal charge transfer (LMCT), involving O 2p → Co(II)-3d transitions, with our calculations also indicating some contributions from other MMCT states. Hence, this later energy band corresponds to the actual semiconducting band gap that defines the semiconductor properties of CoO.
在这项工作中,基于嵌入簇方法并结合一系列基于粒子/空穴和波函数的方法,对CoO的光学带隙(BG)问题进行了系统的计算研究。文献中报道了总共三个块状CoO的实验带隙能量,其性质一直存在争议。这项工作将表明,准确描述激发态并合理解释这些实验带隙需要对强电子关联效应进行明确的处理和分析。这些关联效应使得低能光学激发能够从“中性”和“离子”反铁磁构型中出现,这取决于电子结构如何在耦合的高自旋四面体Co(II)(A位)和低自旋八面体Co(III)(B位)中心之间重新组织。为了区分这两个不同位点的贡献,这项工作引入了参考体系AlCo(II)O和Co(III)ZnO,它们分别隔离了Co(II)和Co(III)位点。解决这样一个复杂的激发态问题需要超越密度泛函理论(DFT)的粒子/空穴方法,并采用一系列基于单参考和多参考波函数的方法。特别是,完全活性空间组态相互作用自洽场(CASSCF)及其近似的CI变体与二阶N电子价态微扰理论(NEVPT2)相结合,能够准确预测CoO中所有三个实验观测到的BG能量。我们的计算结果与最低能量带隙对应于局部四面体Co(II)中心内配体场(LF)类型跃迁的观点一致。此外,计算预测中间能量带隙是A位的LF跃迁与跨A-A'和A-B/B-A'对的金属-金属电荷转移(MMCT)跃迁的混合。这些跃迁在A位产生Co(I)和Co(III)构型,偏离了原来基于Co(II)的构型。这个中间带被指定为CoO实际实验观测到的光学带隙。最后,最高能量带隙同样是A位的LF跃迁与配体-金属电荷转移(LMCT)的混合,涉及O 2p→Co(II)-3d跃迁,我们的计算还表明其他MMCT态也有一些贡献。因此,这个较高能量带对应于定义CoO半导体性质的实际半导体带隙。