Sandino Adriana I, Kawase De Queiroz Goncalves Joao Arthur, Pathagamage Pawan, Brochu Baylee M, Sturm Savanah R, Castellano Arthur, Nayak Vasudev Vivekanand, Witek Lukasz, Coelho Paulo G
University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.
Mackenzie Evangelical School of Medicine Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2025 Aug;113(8):e35628. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.35628.
Effective surface treatment of implants is essential for enhancing osseointegration outcomes. This study assessed the influence of alcohol decontamination both with and without secondary argon-based non-thermal plasma (NTP) treatment on osseointegration of endosteal implants in a large translational (sheep) model. Ti6Al4V dental implants were utilized either as received (CTRL), or subjected to ethanol cleaning (for 60 s) followed by NTP (for 60 s) (Clean+Plasma); or treated with NTP alone (Plasma) for 60 s. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy was used for surface elemental analysis, followed by interferometry and sessile drop tests to measure changes in surface roughness and surface energy, respectively. Twelve sheep received implants (one implant per group per sheep) in the iliac crest, and bone healing was evaluated after 3 and 12 weeks using histomorphometric analysis (six sheep/time point). No significant differences in surface roughness (arithmetic mean (Sa) and root mean square (Sq) height: p > 0.161 and p > 0.173, respectively) or topographies were detected between implant surfaces. However, both NTP treated groups presented higher surface energies and lower water contact angle values relative to CTRL surface (p < 0.001). Compared to the CTRL, both NTP-treated groups exhibited reduced levels of Carbon and elevated levels of Oxygen. No significant differences in Bone-to-Implant Contact (BIC) or Bone Area Fractional Occupancy (BAFO) were observed among groups at 3 weeks. At the 12-week time point, Plasma implants demonstrated significantly higher BAFO (p = 0.014) compared to the CTRL group, as well as an increase in both BIC and BAFO over time (3 vs. 12 weeks in vivo) (p = 0.041 and p = 0.043, respectively). Building on the existing literature, the current study suggests that NTP treatment alone may be adequate to successfully enhance osseointegration while minimizing contamination risks, thereby eliminating the need for additional cleaning protocols.
对植入物进行有效的表面处理对于提高骨整合效果至关重要。本研究在一个大型转化(绵羊)模型中评估了有无二次氩基非热等离子体(NTP)处理的酒精消毒对骨内植入物骨整合的影响。Ti6Al4V牙种植体要么按收到时的状态使用(CTRL),要么先进行乙醇清洗(60秒),然后进行NTP处理(60秒)(清洗+等离子体);要么仅用NTP处理(等离子体)60秒。使用X射线光电子能谱进行表面元素分析,随后分别通过干涉测量和静滴试验测量表面粗糙度和表面能的变化。12只绵羊在髂嵴接受植入物(每只绵羊每组一个植入物),并在3周和12周后使用组织形态计量学分析评估骨愈合情况(每个时间点6只绵羊)。在植入物表面之间未检测到表面粗糙度(算术平均值(Sa)和均方根(Sq)高度:分别为p>0.161和p>0.173)或形貌的显著差异。然而,相对于CTRL表面,两个NTP处理组均呈现出更高的表面能和更低的水接触角值(p<0.001)。与CTRL相比,两个NTP处理组的碳含量降低,氧含量升高。在3周时,各组之间未观察到骨与植入物接触(BIC)或骨面积分数占有率(BAFO)的显著差异。在12周时间点,与CTRL组相比,等离子体植入物的BAFO显著更高(p=0.014),并且随着时间推移(体内3周与12周)BIC和BAFO均增加(分别为p=0.041和p=0.043)。基于现有文献,本研究表明仅NTP处理可能足以成功增强骨整合,同时将污染风险降至最低,从而无需额外的清洁方案。