• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用青年共同设计的生成式人工智能制作电子烟危害意识广告。

Generative Artificial Intelligence With Youth Codesign to Create Vaping Awareness Advertisements.

作者信息

Leung Janni, Sun Tianze, Stjepanovic Daniel, Vu Giang, Yimer Tesfa, Connor Jason P, Hall Wayne, Chan Gary C K

机构信息

The National Centre for Youth Substance Use Research, School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.

Queensland Alliance for Environmental Health Science, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jul 1;8(7):e2514040. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.14040.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.14040
PMID:40742592
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12314720/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Traditional approaches to developing youth vaping awareness campaigns are time-consuming and can create critical delays in public health response. Although generative artificial intelligence (AI) offers promising capabilities for health communication, research has been limited to text-only messages.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate (1) the perceived message effectiveness (PME) of AI-generated, youth-codesigned vaping awareness social media advertisements (ads) compared with existing ads from official health agencies and (2) how different source labeling is associated with PME.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This randomized clinical trial used a 2 (ad source) by 4 (source labeling) design and was conducted online from September 2 to September 19, 2024. Participants were individuals aged 16 to 25 years.

EXPOSURE

All participants evaluated 50 ads from 2 sources (within-participants; 25 AI-generated, 25 existing) in random order.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome, PME, was measured using the validated PME Scale for Youth, which assessed 2 effects perceptions (vaping perception and behavioral intent) and 3 ad perceptions (attention, information, and convincingness) on 7-point scales, with lower scores indicating better effectiveness for effects perceptions and higher scores indicating better effectiveness for ad perceptions.

RESULTS

Six hundred fourteen individuals (mean [SD] age, 20.5 [2.9] years; 300 female [48.9%]; 300 male [48.9%]; 14 other [2.3%]) provided 30 700 observations. Participants were randomly allocated to 1 of 4 experimentally manipulated labeling conditions (between-participants): (1) no source label (147 participants), (2) made with AI (158 participants), (3) made by the World Health Organization (WHO) (151 participants), or (4) made with AI by the WHO (158 participants). AI-generated ads demonstrated noninferiority to existing ads across all measures. AI-generated ads received better ratings for discouraging vaping (b = 0.09; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.17), attention-grabbing qualities (b = -0.15; 95% CI, -0.26 to -0.03), and convincingness (b = -0.18; 95% CI, -0.30 to -0.07) (all P for noninferiority tests <.001). Source labeling showed no significant association with PME scores (χ2 values ranging from 0.10 to 4.19; all P > .20).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this randomized clinical trial of vaping awareness social media ads, AI-generated, youth-codesigned ads achieved superior effectiveness ratings compared with existing ads. These findings support the potential for leveraging generative AI technology in public health campaigns, while indicating the need for appropriate governance frameworks as AI-generated health materials become increasingly prevalent.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT07042789.

摘要

重要性

开展青少年电子烟防范宣传活动的传统方法耗时较长,可能会在公共卫生应对方面造成严重延误。尽管生成式人工智能(AI)为健康传播提供了有前景的能力,但相关研究仅限于纯文本信息。

目的

评估(1)与官方卫生机构的现有广告相比,由人工智能生成、青少年共同设计的电子烟防范社交媒体广告的感知信息效果(PME),以及(2)不同的来源标注如何与PME相关联。

设计、背景和参与者:这项随机临床试验采用2(广告来源)×4(来源标注)设计,于2024年9月2日至9月19日在线进行。参与者为16至25岁的个体。

暴露

所有参与者以随机顺序评估来自2个来源的50则广告(参与者内;25则由人工智能生成,25则为现有广告)。

主要结局和测量指标

主要结局PME使用经过验证的青少年PME量表进行测量,该量表在7分制上评估2种效果感知(对电子烟的感知和行为意图)和3种广告感知(注意力、信息和说服力),效果感知得分越低表明效果越好,广告感知得分越高表明效果越好。

结果

614名个体(平均[标准差]年龄,20.5[2.9]岁;300名女性[48.9%];300名男性[48.9%];14名其他性别[2.3%])提供了30700条观察数据。参与者被随机分配到4种实验性操作的标注条件之一(参与者间):(1)无来源标注(147名参与者),(2)由人工智能制作(158名参与者),(3)由世界卫生组织(WHO)制作(151名参与者),或(4)由WHO使用人工智能制作(158名参与者)。在所有测量指标上,由人工智能生成的广告表现出不劣于现有广告。由人工智能生成的广告在劝阻吸电子烟方面获得了更好的评分(b = 0.09;95%置信区间,0.01至0.17)、吸引注意力的特质(b = -0.15;95%置信区间,-0.26至-0.03)和说服力(b = -0.18;95%置信区间,-0.30至-0.07)(所有非劣效性检验的P <.001)。来源标注与PME得分无显著关联(卡方值范围为0.10至4.19;所有P >.20)。

结论与意义

在这项关于电子烟防范社交媒体广告的随机临床试验中,由人工智能生成、青少年共同设计的广告与现有广告相比,获得了更高的效果评分。这些发现支持了在公共卫生宣传活动中利用生成式人工智能技术的潜力,同时表明随着人工智能生成的健康材料日益普及,需要适当的治理框架。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT07042789。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91fe/12314720/290a104cf530/jamanetwopen-e2514040-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91fe/12314720/a93fef173a15/jamanetwopen-e2514040-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91fe/12314720/290a104cf530/jamanetwopen-e2514040-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91fe/12314720/a93fef173a15/jamanetwopen-e2514040-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91fe/12314720/290a104cf530/jamanetwopen-e2514040-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Generative Artificial Intelligence With Youth Codesign to Create Vaping Awareness Advertisements.利用青年共同设计的生成式人工智能制作电子烟危害意识广告。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jul 1;8(7):e2514040. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.14040.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Utility of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Japanese Medical Interview Training: Randomized Crossover Pilot Study.生成式人工智能在日本医学面试培训中的效用:随机交叉试点研究。
JMIR Med Educ. 2025 Aug 1;11:e77332. doi: 10.2196/77332.
4
Examining the Longitudinal Relationship Between Perceived and Actual Message Effectiveness: A Randomized Trial.考察感知和实际信息效果之间的纵向关系:一项随机试验。
Health Commun. 2024 Jul;39(8):1510-1519. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2023.2222459. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
5
Design and Baseline Evaluation of Social Media Vaping Prevention Trial: Randomized Controlled Trial Study.社交媒体电子烟预防试验的设计与基线评估:随机对照试验研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 31;27:e72002. doi: 10.2196/72002.
6
Safety and User Experience of a Generative Artificial Intelligence Digital Mental Health Intervention: Exploratory Randomized Controlled Trial.生成式人工智能数字心理健康干预的安全性与用户体验:探索性随机对照试验
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 23;27:e67365. doi: 10.2196/67365.
7
Satisfactory Evaluation of Call Service Using AI After Ureteral Stent Insertion: Randomized Controlled Trial.输尿管支架置入术后使用人工智能对呼叫服务的满意度评估:随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 21;27:e56039. doi: 10.2196/56039.
8
Artificial intelligence for detecting keratoconus.人工智能在圆锥角膜检测中的应用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 15;11(11):CD014911. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014911.pub2.
9
Artificial intelligence for diagnosing exudative age-related macular degeneration.人工智能在渗出性年龄相关性黄斑变性诊断中的应用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Oct 17;10(10):CD015522. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015522.pub2.
10
Development of the generative artificial intelligence awareness scale for secondary school students in Türkiye.土耳其中学生生成式人工智能意识量表的编制
Eur J Pediatr. 2025 Aug 30;184(9):585. doi: 10.1007/s00431-025-06435-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Health Equity and Ethical Considerations in Using Artificial Intelligence in Public Health and Medicine.人工智能在公共卫生和医学中的应用:健康公平和伦理问题。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2024 Aug 22;21:E64. doi: 10.5888/pcd21.240245.
2
Towards AI-Driven Healthcare: Systematic Optimization, Linguistic Analysis, and Clinicians' Evaluation of Large Language Models for Smoking Cessation Interventions.迈向人工智能驱动的医疗保健:大型语言模型在戒烟干预中的系统优化、语言分析及临床医生评估
Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum Factor Comput Syst. 2024 May;2024. doi: 10.1145/3613904.3641965. Epub 2024 May 11.
3
Health Disinformation Use Case Highlighting the Urgent Need for Artificial Intelligence Vigilance: Weapons of Mass Disinformation.
健康类虚假信息用例凸显了人工智能监管的迫切需求:大规模虚假信息的武器。
JAMA Intern Med. 2024 Jan 1;184(1):92-96. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.5947.
4
An artificially intelligent, natural language processing chatbot designed to promote COVID-19 vaccination: A proof-of-concept pilot study.一个旨在促进新冠疫苗接种的人工智能自然语言处理聊天机器人:一项概念验证性试点研究。
Digit Health. 2023 Mar 5;9:20552076231155679. doi: 10.1177/20552076231155679. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
5
Sources of bias in artificial intelligence that perpetuate healthcare disparities-A global review.导致医疗保健差距长期存在的人工智能偏差来源——一项全球综述。
PLOS Digit Health. 2022 Mar 31;1(3):e0000022. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000022. eCollection 2022 Mar.
6
Harnessing Artificial Intelligence for Health Message Generation: The Folic Acid Message Engine.利用人工智能生成健康信息:叶酸信息引擎。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 18;24(1):e28858. doi: 10.2196/28858.
7
Development of the UNC Perceived Message Effectiveness Scale for Youth.北卡罗来纳大学青少年感知信息有效性量表的编制。
Tob Control. 2023 Sep;32(5):553-558. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-056929. Epub 2021 Dec 20.
8
Using mass media campaigns to reduce youth tobacco use: a review.利用大众媒体宣传活动减少青少年烟草使用:一项综述
Am J Health Promot. 2015 Nov-Dec;30(2):e71-82. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.130510-LIT-237. Epub 2014 Nov 5.
9
Health communication campaigns and their impact on behavior.健康传播活动及其对行为的影响。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2007 Mar-Apr;39(2 Suppl):S32-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2006.09.004.