Suppr超能文献

评估局限性前列腺癌的微创治疗策略:高强度聚焦超声与根治性前列腺切除术的比较荟萃分析

Evaluating less-invasive strategies for localized prostate cancer: a comparative meta-analysis on high-intensity focused ultrasound versus radical prostatectomy.

作者信息

Lepine Henrique L, Vicentini Fabio C, Filho Christiano Machado, Cavalcante Guilherme, Llata Fernanda M, Júnior José Bessa, Reis Leonardo O, Mota José Maurício, Nahas William Carlos, Ribeiro-Filho Leopoldo Alves, Suartz Caio Vinícius

机构信息

University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Department of Urology, Hospital das Clinicas, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Int Urol Nephrol. 2025 Jul 31. doi: 10.1007/s11255-025-04695-9.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Prostate cancer is frequently managed with radical prostatectomy (RP), which can offer excellent oncological control but with significant genitourinary morbidity. High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) has emerged as a less-invasive alternative. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the oncological, functional, and safety outcomes of HIFU versus RP in men with localized prostate cancer.

METHODS

Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane through December 2024 for comparative studies of HIFU and RP. Fourteen studies (including two randomized trials) met inclusion criteria. The primary endpoint was salvage therapy-free survival (STFS). Secondary outcomes included biochemical recurrence, metastasis-free survival, functional outcomes, and complications. Random-effect models were applied, and meta-regression explored sources of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Overall, HIFU was associated with lower STFS (odds ratio [OR]: 0.65, p = 0.02) although biochemical recurrence and metastasis-free survival did not differ significantly between treatments. Focal HIFU showed fewer major complications (OR: 0.36) and significantly better erectile function preservation (OR: 6.03), but minor complications were slightly more frequent. High heterogeneity was partly explained by study design and follow-up duration. Limitations include substantial heterogeneity, variable definitions of outcomes, and relatively short follow-ups in some studies.

CONCLUSION

For selected patients, biochemical recurrence and metastasis-free survival did not differ significantly between treatments although HIFU was associated with lower STFS. Particularly as focal therapy, it shows the potential to achieve oncologic outcomes comparable to radical prostatectomy while enhancing erectile function preservation, urinary continence, and reducing major complications. Further long-term prospective studies are warranted to solidify these findings.

摘要

目的

前列腺癌常采用根治性前列腺切除术(RP)进行治疗,该手术能实现良好的肿瘤学控制,但会导致显著的泌尿生殖系统并发症。高强度聚焦超声(HIFU)已成为一种侵入性较小的替代治疗方法。我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以比较HIFU与RP在局限性前列腺癌男性患者中的肿瘤学、功能和安全性结局。

方法

按照PRISMA指南,我们检索了截至2024年12月的Medline、Embase和Cochrane数据库,以查找HIFU和RP的比较研究。14项研究(包括两项随机试验)符合纳入标准。主要终点是无挽救性治疗生存(STFS)。次要结局包括生化复发、无转移生存、功能结局和并发症。应用随机效应模型,荟萃回归探索异质性来源。

结果

总体而言,HIFU与较低的STFS相关(优势比[OR]:0.65,p = 0.02),尽管治疗之间生化复发和无转移生存无显著差异。聚焦HIFU显示出较少的主要并发症(OR:0.36)和显著更好的勃起功能保留(OR:6.03),但轻微并发症略为常见。研究设计和随访时间部分解释了高度异质性。局限性包括大量异质性、结局定义的差异以及一些研究中相对较短的随访时间。

结论

对于选定的患者,尽管HIFU与较低的STFS相关,但治疗之间生化复发和无转移生存无显著差异。特别是作为局部治疗,它显示出在实现与根治性前列腺切除术相当的肿瘤学结局的同时,增强勃起功能保留、尿失禁并减少主要并发症的潜力。需要进一步的长期前瞻性研究来巩固这些发现。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验