Denis Chloé S, Cousin François, De Laere Bram, Vanwelkenhuyzen Jan, Hustinx Roland, Sautois Brieuc R, Withofs Nadia
Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital of Liege, Liege, Belgium;
Division of Nuclear Medicine and Oncological Imaging, Department of Medical Physics, University Hospital of Liege, Liege, Belgium.
J Nucl Med. 2025 Jul 31. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.125.269729.
The impact of heterogeneous interlesional tumor response on outcomes in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the role of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT in assessing patient outcomes on the basis of global tumor response and interlesional tumor response. We retrospectively analyzed data for 24 patients with mCRPC treated with androgen receptor pathway inhibitors who underwent [Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT at baseline and at weeks 4 and 12 of therapy as well as conventional imaging at baseline and week 12 of therapy. Global PET/CT response was evaluated in accordance with the European Association of Urology/European Association of Nuclear Medicine criteria, classifying patients as having progressive disease (PD) or nonprogressive disease (non-PD) (i.e., complete response, partial response, or stable disease) and was correlated with overall survival (OS), prostate-specific antigen-progression-free survival (PSA-PFS) (i.e., time from diagnosis to PSA progression or death from any cause), radiologic progression-free survival, and time to no longer clinically benefiting from treatment. For interlesional assessment, a subset of PSMA-positive lesions was extracted from each patient and compared longitudinally. Patients classified as having either interlesional progression or interlesional homogeneous response were included in the OS and PSA-PFS analyses. The median OS was 22 mo for patients with PD ( = 8) and 51 mo for those with non-PD ( = 16) (hazard ratio [HR], 28.2; < 0.0001). PSMA PET/CT-based response was significantly associated with median PSA-PFS (6.5 mo vs. not reached [NR]; HR, 20.5; = 0.0001), radiologic progression-free survival (9 mo vs. NR; HR, 12.2; = 0.002), and time to no longer clinically benefiting from treatment (12 mo vs. NR; HR, 18.6; = 0.0002) for patients with PD versus non-PD, respectively. The results were similar at week 12 and remained statistically significant. Interlesional assessment was performed for 125 PSMA-positive lesions in 20 (83%) patients. At week 12, 9 (45%) of 20 patients had interlesional progression, which was significantly associated with worse outcomes compared with patients who had an interlesional homogeneous response (median PSA-PFS, 7 mo vs. NR; HR, 19.2; < 0.0001; median OS, 16 mo vs. 52 mo; HR, 31.2; < 0.0001, respectively). Assessment of interlesional tumor response at week 12 by sequential PSMA PET/CT enabled the identification of patients with mCRPC who had worse outcomes after treatment with an androgen receptor pathway inhibitor.
异质性瘤内肿瘤反应对转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)患者预后的影响尚不清楚。我们旨在评估前列腺特异性膜抗原(PSMA)PET/CT在基于整体肿瘤反应和瘤内肿瘤反应评估患者预后方面的作用。我们回顾性分析了24例接受雄激素受体通路抑制剂治疗的mCRPC患者的数据,这些患者在基线、治疗第4周和第12周接受了[Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT检查,以及在基线和治疗第12周进行了传统成像检查。根据欧洲泌尿外科学会/欧洲核医学协会标准评估整体PET/CT反应,将患者分类为疾病进展(PD)或非疾病进展(非PD)(即完全缓解、部分缓解或疾病稳定),并将其与总生存期(OS)、前列腺特异性抗原无进展生存期(PSA-PFS)(即从诊断到PSA进展或因任何原因死亡的时间)、影像学无进展生存期以及不再从治疗中获得临床益处的时间相关联。对于瘤内评估,从每位患者中提取一部分PSMA阳性病变并进行纵向比较。被分类为具有瘤内进展或瘤内均匀反应的患者纳入OS和PSA-PFS分析。PD患者的中位OS为22个月(n = 8),非PD患者为51个月(n = 16)(风险比[HR],28.2;P < 0.0001)。基于PSMA PET/CT的反应分别与PD患者和非PD患者的中位PSA-PFS(6.5个月对未达到[NR];HR,20.5;P = 0.0001)、影像学无进展生存期(9个月对NR;HR,12.2;P = 0.002)以及不再从治疗中获得临床益处的时间(12个月对NR;HR,18.6;P = 0.0002)显著相关。在第12周时结果相似且仍具有统计学意义。对20例(83%)患者的125个PSMA阳性病变进行了瘤内评估。在第12周时,20例患者中有9例(45%)出现瘤内进展,与具有瘤内均匀反应的患者相比,其预后明显更差(中位PSA-PFS,7个月对NR;HR,19.2;P < 0.0001;中位OS,16个月对52个月;HR,31.2;P < 0.0001)。通过序贯PSMA PET/CT在第12周评估瘤内肿瘤反应能够识别出在接受雄激素受体通路抑制剂治疗后预后较差的mCRPC患者。