Sprague J M, Berlucchi G, Antonini A
Behav Brain Res. 1985 Sep-Oct;17(2):145-62. doi: 10.1016/0166-4328(85)90026-9.
Cats were trained preoperatively for brightness discrimination, and 7 pattern and form discriminations, and then retested for preoperative retention on each discrimination. Cortical lesions were then placed in areas 17 and 18 in one group (4 cats), in areas 17, 18 and 19 in another group (3 cats), and in suprasylvian cortex (areas 7, 21, and parts of 19, 5 and the lateral suprasylvian cortex) in a third group (4 cats). Results are also reported for a fourth group with extensive suprasylvian lesions, to which was added an unintended undercutting of areas 17 and 18 (4 cats). While during original preoperative learning the training continued until a fixed, stringent criterion of performance was attained, both preoperative and postoperative retention was tested in short sessions, involving a limited number of trials and a less stringent statistical criterion (significant run). After extensive removal of areas 17 and 18, all cats behaved as though following the cortical lesion they could immediately recognize the discriminative stimuli as efficiently as before, with no need for retraining. On the contrary, the group with areas 17, 18 and 19 lesions showed a substantial postoperative loss of all discriminations, and especially for the more difficult form discriminations, the reattainment of a significant level of performance was hard or impossible within the allotted number of trials. Also in the group with limited suprasylvian lesions, postoperative retention was generally impaired, but the reacquisition of efficient performance was superior to that of the previous group. Finally, large suprasylvian lesions encroaching on the white matter under areas 17, 18 and 19 proved disruptive for all discriminative capacities, both in retention and in relearning. The excellent retention of all discriminations following areas 17 and 18 lesions once again shows that these areas are by no means essential for complex vision in the cat. In addition, the results strongly indicate that the high-level visual capacities of destriate cats are not due to reorganization of readaptation processes occurring in extrastriate areas after a 17/18 removal. The clear-cut retention deficits which were present in cats with cortical lesions more extensive than areas 17 and 18 or outside of the latter areas prove the essential participation of extrastriate cortical areas in visual discrimination including form. However, the distribution of functions among the various visual cortical areas in visual discrimination remains poorly understood.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
术前对猫进行亮度辨别训练以及7种图案和形状辨别训练,然后对每种辨别进行术前记忆的重新测试。然后,一组(4只猫)在17区和18区进行皮质损伤,另一组(3只猫)在17区、18区和19区进行损伤,第三组(4只猫)在颞上回皮质(7区、21区以及19区、5区和颞上回外侧皮质的部分区域)进行损伤。还报告了第四组广泛颞上回损伤的结果,该组意外地对17区和18区进行了咬切(4只猫)。在最初的术前学习期间,训练持续进行直到达到固定、严格的表现标准,但术前和术后的记忆测试均在短时间内进行,涉及有限次数的试验和不太严格的统计标准(显著连续)。在广泛切除17区和18区后,所有的猫表现得就好像在皮质损伤后它们能像之前一样立即有效地识别辨别刺激,无需重新训练。相反,17区、18区和19区损伤的那组猫术后所有辨别能力都有大幅下降,尤其是对于更难的形状辨别,在规定的试验次数内很难或不可能重新达到显著的表现水平。同样,在颞上回损伤有限的那组猫中,术后记忆通常受损,但有效表现的重新获得优于前一组。最后,侵犯17区、18区和19区下方白质的广泛颞上回损伤对所有辨别能力在记忆和重新学习方面都有破坏作用。17区和18区损伤后所有辨别能力的出色记忆再次表明,这些区域对猫的复杂视觉绝非必不可少。此外,结果强烈表明,去皮质猫的高级视觉能力并非由于在切除17/18区后在纹外区发生的重新组织或重新适应过程。皮质损伤比17区和18区更广泛或在后者区域之外的猫中存在的明显记忆缺陷证明了纹外皮质区域在包括形状在内的视觉辨别中至关重要的参与。然而,在视觉辨别中各种视觉皮质区域之间功能的分布仍然了解甚少。(摘要截断于400字)