Imai Hirotatsu, Kanie Yuya, Yoshimoto Shusuke, Yamamoto Natsuki, Furuya Masayuki, Fujimori Takahito, Okada Seiji
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, 565-0871, Osaka, Japan.
Life-omics Research Division, Institute for Open and Transdisciplinary Research Initiative, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 31;15(1):27955. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-13433-1.
Pain assessment in clinical practice largely relies on patient-reported subjectivity. Although previous studies using fMRI and EEG have attempted objective pain evaluation, their focus has been limited to resting conditions. This study aimed to classify pain levels during movement using a wearable device with three forehead electrodes and advanced machine learning. Twenty-five healthy participants performed walking tasks under tourniquet-induced pain. It was confirmed that pain increased as walking time extended. Walking time was used as an index of pain stimulus intensity, and EEG data were collected to classify pain levels. Three machine learning algorithms-Random Forest, eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Light Gradient Boosting Machine-were employed. XGBoost achieved the highest classification performance among them. Classification accuracy for 2-, 3-, and 5-class classifications was evaluated and compared with and without BrainRate (BR), a metric indicating changes in the frequency spectrum and reflecting relative shifts across all frequency bands. Without BR, accuracies were 0.82 for 2-class, 0.60 for 3-class, and 0.40 for 5-class classification. Including BR improved accuracies to 0.96, 0.75, and 0.47, respectively. These findings highlight the significant role of BR in improving pain classification accuracy and the potential of this system for objective pain assessment even during movement.
临床实践中的疼痛评估很大程度上依赖于患者报告的主观性。尽管先前使用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)和脑电图(EEG)的研究尝试进行客观的疼痛评估,但其重点仅限于静息状态。本研究旨在使用带有三个前额电极的可穿戴设备和先进的机器学习技术对运动过程中的疼痛程度进行分类。25名健康参与者在止血带诱导的疼痛下进行步行任务。结果证实,疼痛随着步行时间的延长而增加。步行时间被用作疼痛刺激强度的指标,并收集脑电图数据以对疼痛程度进行分类。采用了三种机器学习算法——随机森林、极端梯度提升(XGBoost)和轻量级梯度提升机。其中XGBoost实现了最高的分类性能。评估了二分类、三分类和五分类的分类准确率,并将有无BrainRate(BR)(一种表明频谱变化并反映所有频段相对偏移的指标)的情况进行了比较。没有BR时,二分类准确率为0.82,三分类为0.60,五分类为0.40。纳入BR后,准确率分别提高到0.96、0.75和0.47。这些发现突出了BR在提高疼痛分类准确率方面的重要作用,以及该系统在运动过程中进行客观疼痛评估的潜力。