Saki Farzaneh, Ziya Marziyeh
Department of Exercise Rehabilitation, Faculty of Sports Science, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran.
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Jul 31;25(1):573. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-06219-7.
The Feldenkrais Method and Dynamic Neuromuscular Stabilization (DNS) exercises have each demonstrated benefits for managing chronic low back pain (CLBP). However, limited research has explored their combined efficacy, particularly in older women with nonspecific CLBP. This study aimed to assess the clinical effects of combining these interventions.
This randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted over eight weeks (July 17 to September 11, 2024) at the Sports Sciences Laboratory of Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran. Thirty elderly women, aged 60-80 years, with nonspecific CLBP were randomly assigned using a computer-generated sequence to either a DNS group (n=15) or a combined DNS exercises and Feldenkrais Method (DNSFME) group (n=15). The DNS protocol consist of stabilization exercises targeting core control, while the Feldenkrais Method involved awareness and movement re-education sessions. Outcome measures were pain intensity, measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), lumbar flexion and extension range of motion (ROM), assessed via Schober's test, and kinesiophobia evaluated using the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK). Assessments were conducted at baseline and post-intervention. Between-group differences were analyzed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) adjusted for baseline values, and paired t-tests were used to assess within-group changes (P≤0.05).
Participants were older women (mean age 65.44 ± 3.99 years) with no significant baseline differences in demographic or clinical characteristics between groups. The DNSFME group showed significantly greater improvements compared to the DNS group in pain intensity (p = 0.010, partial η² = 0.255), kinesiophobia (p < 0.001, partial η² = 0.493), lumbar flexion ROM (p = 0.007, partial η² = 0.273), and lumbar extension ROM (p < 0.001, partial η² = 0.429). Within-group improvements were significant for both groups. For the DNS group: pain (p < 0.001, 95% CI: 3.15 to 4.57), kinesiophobia (p < 0.001, 95% CI: 10.25 to17.18), lumbar flexion ROM (p < 0.001, 95% CI: -1.57 to -1.09), and lumbar extension ROM (p < 0.001, 95% CI: -0.81 to-0.50). For the DNSFME group: pain (p < 0.001, 95% CI: 4.27 to 5.72), kinesiophobia (p < 0.001, 95% CI: 17.57 to 24.16), lumbar flexion ROM (p < 0.001, 95% CI: -2.16 to -1.59), and lumbar extension ROM (p < 0.001, 95% CI:-1.12 to -0.84).
Both interventions effectively alleviated pain and fear of movement while enhancing lumbar range of motion in older women with chronic low back pain. The combined intervention, integrating the Feldenkrais Method with Dynamic Neuromuscular Stabilization exercises, yielded superior clinical outcomes, supporting its incorporation into rehabilitation programs to improve functional independence and quality of life.
费登奎斯方法和动态神经肌肉稳定化(DNS)练习已各自证明对慢性下腰痛(CLBP)的管理有益。然而,有限的研究探索了它们的联合疗效,特别是在患有非特异性CLBP的老年女性中。本研究旨在评估这些干预措施相结合的临床效果。
这项随机对照试验(RCT)于2024年7月17日至9月11日在伊朗哈马丹布阿里·西纳大学体育科学实验室进行了八周。30名年龄在60 - 80岁之间、患有非特异性CLBP的老年女性使用计算机生成的序列随机分配到DNS组(n = 15)或DNS练习与费登奎斯方法联合组(DNSFME组,n = 15)。DNS方案包括针对核心控制的稳定化练习,而费登奎斯方法涉及意识和运动再教育课程。结果测量指标包括通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)测量的疼痛强度、通过肖伯试验评估的腰椎屈伸活动范围(ROM)以及使用坦帕运动恐惧量表(TSK)评估的运动恐惧。在基线和干预后进行评估。使用针对基线值进行调整的协方差分析(ANCOVA)分析组间差异,并使用配对t检验评估组内变化(P≤0.05)。
参与者为老年女性(平均年龄65.44±3.99岁),两组在人口统计学或临床特征方面基线无显著差异。与DNS组相比,DNSFME组在疼痛强度(p = 0.010,偏η² = 0.255)、运动恐惧(p < 0.001,偏η² = 0.493)、腰椎前屈ROM(p = 0.007,偏η² = 0.273)和腰椎后伸ROM(p < 0.001,偏η² = 0.429)方面显示出显著更大的改善。两组组内改善均显著。对于DNS组:疼痛(p < 0.001,95%CI:3.15至4.57)、运动恐惧(p < 0.001,95%CI:10.25至17.18)、腰椎前屈ROM(p < 0.001,95%CI: - 1.57至 - 1.09)和腰椎后伸ROM(p < 0.001,95%CI: - 0.81至 - 0.50)。对于DNSFME组:疼痛(p < 0.001,95%CI:4.27至5.72)、运动恐惧(p < 0.001,95%CI:17.57至24.16)腰椎前屈ROM(p < 0.001,95%CI: - 2.16至 - 1.59)和腰椎后伸ROM(p < 0.001,95%CI: - 1.12至 - 0.84)。
两种干预措施均有效减轻了慢性下腰痛老年女性的疼痛和运动恐惧,同时增加了腰椎活动范围。将费登奎斯方法与动态神经肌肉稳定化练习相结合的联合干预产生了更好的临床效果,支持将其纳入康复计划以提高功能独立性和生活质量。