• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

维生素D与系统性红斑狼疮的易感性和疾病严重程度相关:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Vitamin D Is Associated With Susceptibility and Disease Severity in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Ranjan Shovit, Das Bidyut K, Tripathy Rina, Pattanaik Sarit S, Parida Manoj, Tripathy Saumya Ranjan, Panda Aditya K

机构信息

University Department of Zoology, Kolhan University, Chaibasa, Jharkhand, India.

Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, SCB Medical College, Cuttack, Odisha, India.

出版信息

Int J Rheum Dis. 2025 Aug;28(8):e70379. doi: 10.1111/1756-185x.70379.

DOI:10.1111/1756-185x.70379
PMID:40745895
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Vitamin D, recognized for its immunomodulatory properties, is potentially associated with autoimmune diseases like systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the relationship between Vitamin D levels and SLE, highlighting its role in modulating disease activity and immunological markers like anti-dsDNA, C3, and C4.

METHODS

Case-control studies reporting Vitamin D, disease activity indices, C3, C4, and anti-dsDNA antibody levels in SLE patients and healthy controls were evaluated. Systematic searches in PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, and Embase were last updated on April 6, 2024. Inclusion criteria targeted studies on SLE patients and healthy controls reporting these specific markers. Study quality was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), and publication bias was checked using Egger's test and Begg's funnel plot. The meta-analyses were conducted with CMAv4.

RESULTS

Analysis of 43 studies with 2940 SLE patients and 2458 healthy controls showed significantly lower Vitamin D levels in SLE patients (mean difference: -10.070 ng/mL; 95% CI: -12.85 to -7.28; p < 0.001). Vitamin D levels negatively correlated with SLEDAI scores (correlation: -0.427; 95% CI: -0.541 to -0.298; p < 0.001) and anti-dsDNA antibodies (correlation: -0.397; 95% CI: -0.611 to -0.130; p = 0.004), and positively correlated with complement components C3 (correlation: 0.268; 95% CI: 0.077-0.440; p = 0.006) and C4 (correlation: 0.299; 95% CI: 0.192-0.400; p < 0.001). Sensitivity analyses confirmed these findings.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings revealed a strong association between low Vitamin D levels and increased SLE severity. However, limitations like some inconsistency, small-study biases, and possible language restrictions in study inclusion necessitate cautious interpretation.

摘要

目的

维生素D因其免疫调节特性而被认可,它可能与系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)等自身免疫性疾病有关。本系统评价和荟萃分析评估了维生素D水平与SLE之间的关系,突出了其在调节疾病活动以及抗双链DNA、C3和C4等免疫标志物方面的作用。

方法

对报告SLE患者和健康对照中维生素D、疾病活动指数、C3、C4和抗双链DNA抗体水平的病例对照研究进行评估。在PubMed、Scopus、ScienceDirect、Web of Science和Embase上的系统检索于2024年4月6日最后更新。纳入标准针对报告这些特定标志物的SLE患者和健康对照的研究。使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)评估研究质量,并使用Egger检验和Begg漏斗图检查发表偏倚。使用CMAv4进行荟萃分析。

结果

对43项研究(2940例SLE患者和2458例健康对照)的分析显示,SLE患者的维生素D水平显著较低(平均差异:-10.070 ng/mL;95%可信区间:-12.85至-7.28;p < 0.001)。维生素D水平与SLE疾病活动指数(相关性:-0.427;95%可信区间:-0.541至-0.298;p < 0.001)和抗双链DNA抗体(相关性:-0.397;95%可信区间:-0.611至-0.130;p = 0.004)呈负相关,与补体成分C3(相关性:0.268;95%可信区间:0.077 - 0.440;p = 0.006)和C4(相关性:0.299;95%可信区间:0.192 - 0.400;p < 0.001)呈正相关。敏感性分析证实了这些发现。

结论

研究结果揭示了低维生素D水平与SLE严重程度增加之间的密切关联。然而,一些不一致性、小研究偏倚以及研究纳入中可能存在的语言限制等局限性使得需要谨慎解读。

相似文献

1
Vitamin D Is Associated With Susceptibility and Disease Severity in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.维生素D与系统性红斑狼疮的易感性和疾病严重程度相关:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Rheum Dis. 2025 Aug;28(8):e70379. doi: 10.1111/1756-185x.70379.
2
Serum glutathione reductase level as a disease activity biomarker in systemic lupus erythematosus: a single-centre preliminary study.血清谷胱甘肽还原酶水平作为系统性红斑狼疮疾病活动生物标志物的单中心初步研究。
Lupus Sci Med. 2025 Jun 24;12(1):e001593. doi: 10.1136/lupus-2025-001593.
3
Are anti-nucleosome antibodies a better diagnostic marker than anti-dsDNA antibodies for systemic lupus erythematosus? A systematic review and a study of metanalysis.抗核小体抗体是否优于抗双链 DNA 抗体成为系统性红斑狼疮的更佳诊断标志物?系统评价和荟萃分析研究。
Autoimmun Rev. 2012 Dec;12(2):97-106. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2012.07.002. Epub 2012 Jul 15.
4
Expression pattern and clinical significance of MerTK on circulating NK cells in systemic lupus erythematosus.MerTK在系统性红斑狼疮循环自然杀伤细胞中的表达模式及临床意义
Lupus Sci Med. 2025 Jun 19;12(1):e001407. doi: 10.1136/lupus-2024-001407.
5
Correlation between serum 25(OH)D values and lupus disease activity: an original article and a systematic review with meta-analysis focusing on serum VitD confounders.血清25(OH)D值与狼疮疾病活动度之间的相关性:一篇原创文章及一项聚焦血清维生素D混杂因素的系统评价与荟萃分析
Lupus. 2014 Oct;23(11):1164-77. doi: 10.1177/0961203314540966. Epub 2014 Jun 24.
6
Mapping the Association between Vitamin D and Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.维生素 D 与下腰痛关联的研究:系统评价和观察性研究的荟萃分析。
Pain Physician. 2017 Nov;20(7):611-640.
7
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
8
The association of serum anti-ribosomal P antibody with clinical and serological disorders in systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.系统性红斑狼疮中血清抗核糖体P抗体与临床及血清学紊乱的关联:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Lupus. 2015 May;24(6):588-96. doi: 10.1177/0961203314560003. Epub 2014 Nov 17.
9
Association between Unsaturated Fatty Acid-Type Diet and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analyses.不饱和脂肪酸型饮食与系统性红斑狼疮的相关性:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Nutrients. 2024 Jun 20;16(12):1974. doi: 10.3390/nu16121974.
10
Vitamin D levels and its influencing factors in children and adolescents in mainland China: a systematic review and meta-analysis.中国大陆儿童和青少年的维生素D水平及其影响因素:一项系统综述和荟萃分析
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 26;15(6):e094693. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094693.