Suppr超能文献

病理诊断为正常黏膜的微小结直肠腺瘤额外组织切片的有效性:日本的一项回顾性横断面研究

Efficacy of additional tissue sections for diminutive colorectal adenomas pathologically diagnosed as normal mucosa: a retrospective, cross-sectional study in Japan.

作者信息

Ishii Tsuyoshi, Nishizawa Toshihiro, Watanabe Hidenobu, Sano Masaya, Fujimoto Ai, Takahashi Yoshiyuki, Shimizu Ryo, Ebinuma Hirotoshi, Matsuda Takahisa, Toyoshima Osamu

机构信息

Gastroenterology, Toyoshima Endoscopy Clinic, Tokyo, Japan.

Department of Gastroenterology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Clin Endosc. 2025 Jul;58(4):577-585. doi: 10.5946/ce.2024.265. Epub 2025 Jul 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Endoscopists occasionally encounter discrepancies between endoscopic and pathological diagnoses after colorectal polypectomies. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of additional sections for diagnostic discrepancies.

METHODS

We examined polyps endoscopically diagnosed as adenomas or suspected adenomas that were resected and pathologically diagnosed as adenomas or normal mucosa. Adenomas pathologically diagnosed with initial sections were categorized as the "adenoma by initial section" group. Based on the re-diagnosis with additional sectioning, they were assigned to the "adenoma by additional section" or "normal mucosa by both sections" groups.

RESULTS

In the initial pathological diagnosis of 993 lesions, 850 were diagnosed as adenomas and 143 as normal mucosa. Additional sections corrected the pathological diagnoses in 23.8% (34/143) of cases. The rate of high confidence was significantly higher in the "adenoma by additional section" group than in the "normal mucosa by both sections" group (64.7% vs. 38.5%, p<0.01). Lesions in the "adenoma by additional section" group were significantly smaller than those in the "adenoma by initial section" group (2.7 vs. 3.8 mm, p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Diminutive adenomas can cause discrepancies between endoscopic and pathological diagnoses. Additional sections may help revise the pathological diagnoses, particularly for lesions with high confidence.

摘要

背景

内镜医师在大肠息肉切除术后偶尔会遇到内镜诊断与病理诊断不一致的情况。本研究旨在评估额外切片对诊断差异的有效性。

方法

我们检查了内镜诊断为腺瘤或疑似腺瘤且已切除并经病理诊断为腺瘤或正常黏膜的息肉。病理初诊为腺瘤的病例归为“初诊腺瘤”组。根据额外切片的重新诊断,将其分为“追加切片后腺瘤”组或“两组切片均为正常黏膜”组。

结果

在993个病变的初始病理诊断中,850个诊断为腺瘤,143个诊断为正常黏膜。额外切片在23.8%(34/143)的病例中纠正了病理诊断。“追加切片后腺瘤”组的高置信度率显著高于“两组切片均为正常黏膜”组(64.7%对38.5%,p<0.01)。“追加切片后腺瘤”组的病变明显小于“初诊腺瘤”组(2.7对3.8毫米,p<0.05)。

结论

微小腺瘤可导致内镜诊断与病理诊断不一致。额外切片可能有助于修正病理诊断,尤其是对于高置信度的病变。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17c1/12314616/02f378f95d70/ce-2024-265f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验