Taye Ayanos, Belachew Tefera
School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Science, Institute of Health, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Public Health, Institute of Health, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 17;13:1510430. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1510430. eCollection 2025.
Obstetric violence (OV) is a significant public health issue affecting reproductive health services and maternal health outcomes. Despite studies documenting its prevalence in Ethiopia, no experimental studies have assessed intervention effects. This study evaluates person-centered interventions for OV in public hospitals in Southwest Ethiopia, using an experimental design.
A quasi-experimental study was conducted in Southwest Ethiopia involving 396 women, divided into a control group (CG; = 198) and an intervention group (IG; = 198). The intervention group received person-centered interventions, including respectful maternity care workshops and maternal recognition certificates, while the control group received standard care. Statistical analyses included -tests and regression to assess the intervention's impact on OV.
The proportion of women who utilized companions during facility-based childbirth was higher in the intervention group [25.8%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 19.6, 31.9%] than in the control group (12.1%; 95% CI: 7.5, 16.7%). The proportion of women who experienced OV decreased significantly in the intervention group compared with the control group (IG: 42.05 ± 6.97; CG: 66.45 ± 12.12; < 0.000), with a 26.00-point decrease in the experimental group. The multivariable general linear model revealed that the mean difference (MD) of non-confidential care (MD = -3.28; 95% CI: -3.66, -2.90), undignified care (MD = -7.03; 95% CI: -7.76, -6.31), non-consented care (MD = -5.64; 95% CI: -6.35, -4.92), physical abuse (MD = -4.80; 95% CI: -5.30, -4.31), discrimination (MD = -3.37; 95% CI: -3.79, -2.94), and detention (MD = -0.28; 95% CI: -0.51, -0.05) were significantly reduced in the intervention group, with effect sizes of 0.421, 0.480, 0.380, 0.479, 0.382, and 0.014, respectively. Women in the intervention group had an OV score that was, on average, 23 points lower ( = -23.42; 95% CI: -25.40, -21.44) than those in the control group. Additionally, women in the intervention group who had frequent contact with healthcare providers experienced, on average, a seven-point lower OV score ( = -7.47; 95% CI: -4.055, 18.37) than those in the control group.
This study revealed that implementing person-centered interventions through respectful maternity care workshops, maternity open days, and maternal certificates of recognition significantly decreases the incidence of OV and ultimately promotes respectful maternal care, improving maternal healthcare services.
产科暴力(OV)是一个重大的公共卫生问题,影响着生殖健康服务和孕产妇健康结局。尽管有研究记录了其在埃塞俄比亚的流行情况,但尚无实验性研究评估干预效果。本研究采用实验设计,评估埃塞俄比亚西南部公立医院针对产科暴力的以患者为中心的干预措施。
在埃塞俄比亚西南部进行了一项准实验研究,涉及396名妇女,分为对照组(CG;n = 198)和干预组(IG;n = 198)。干预组接受以患者为中心的干预措施,包括尊重孕产妇护理工作坊和孕产妇认可证书,而对照组接受标准护理。统计分析包括t检验和回归分析,以评估干预对产科暴力的影响。
在机构内分娩时使用陪伴人员的妇女比例,干预组[25.8%;95%置信区间(CI):19.6,31.9%]高于对照组(12.1%;95%CI:7.5,16.7%)。与对照组相比,干预组经历产科暴力的妇女比例显著下降(IG:42.05±6.97;CG:66.45±12.12;P<0.000),实验组下降了26.00分。多变量一般线性模型显示,干预组中,非保密护理(平均差(MD)=-3.28;95%CI:-3.66,-2.90)、不尊重护理(MD=-7.03;95%CI:-7.76,-6.31)、未经同意的护理(MD=-5.64;95%CI:-6.35,-4.92)、身体虐待(MD=-4.80;95%CI:-5.30,-4.31)、歧视(MD=-3.37;95%CI:-3.79,-2.94)和拘留(MD=-0.28;95%CI:-0.51,-0.05)的平均差显著降低,效应大小分别为0.421、0.480、0.380、0.479、0.382和0.014。干预组妇女的产科暴力得分平均比对照组低23分(P=-23.42;95%CI:-25.40,-21.44)。此外,干预组中与医护人员频繁接触的妇女,其产科暴力得分平均比对照组低7分(P=-7.47;95%CI:-4.055,-18.37)。
本研究表明,通过尊重孕产妇护理工作坊、孕产妇开放日和孕产妇认可证书实施以患者为中心的干预措施,可显著降低产科暴力的发生率,并最终促进尊重孕产妇护理,改善孕产妇医疗服务。