Jerez Diaz David, Twohig Patrick
Department of Internal Medicine, Florida State University, Sarasota Memorial Hospital, Sarasota, FL 34239, United States.
Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14682, United States.
World J Hepatol. 2025 Jul 27;17(7):107881. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v17.i7.107881.
In this article, we comment on the article by Peta . This study evaluates the diagnostic performance of FibroTest-Actitest, transient elastography, and the fibrosis-4 index against a histological reference. Using the Obuchowski measure, the authors demonstrate that FibroTest and vibration-controlled transient elastography outperform the fibrosis-4 index in detecting fibrosis. Additionally, Actitest offers superior estimation of inflammatory activity compared to conventional biomarkers. Assessing liver fibrosis is crucial for managing autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), yet reliance on invasive liver biopsy remains higher than in other liver diseases. This is partly due to more complex diagnostic criteria for AIH, the lack of standardized scoring for non-invasive testing, and the presence of inflammation, which can lead to falsely elevated results with non-invasive tests. A Bayesian latent class model further supports the reliability of these non-invasive tests, highlighting their potential to complement biopsy, particularly for long-term disease monitoring. These findings underscore the importance of non-invasive diagnostics in optimizing AIH management.
在本文中,我们对佩塔的文章进行评论。本研究评估了FibroTest-Actitest、瞬时弹性成像和纤维化-4指数相对于组织学参考标准的诊断性能。作者使用奥布霍夫斯基测量法证明,FibroTest和振动控制瞬时弹性成像在检测纤维化方面优于纤维化-4指数。此外,与传统生物标志物相比,Actitest对炎症活动的估计更优。评估肝纤维化对于自身免疫性肝炎(AIH)的管理至关重要,但与其他肝病相比,对侵入性肝活检的依赖程度仍然更高。部分原因在于AIH的诊断标准更为复杂、非侵入性检测缺乏标准化评分,以及存在炎症,这可能导致非侵入性检测结果出现假升高。贝叶斯潜在类别模型进一步支持了这些非侵入性检测的可靠性,突出了它们在补充活检方面的潜力,特别是对于长期疾病监测。这些发现强调了非侵入性诊断在优化AIH管理中的重要性。