Suppr超能文献

使用组织学参考评估FibroTest-ActiTest、瞬时弹性成像和纤维化-4指数在自身免疫性肝炎患者中的诊断性能。

Diagnostic performance of FibroTest-ActiTest, transient elastography, and the fibrosis-4 index in patients with autoimmune hepatitis using histological reference.

作者信息

Peta Valentina, Sandler Yuliya, Deckmyn Olivier, Duroselle Oksana, Vinnitskaya Elena, Khomeriki Sergey, Noskova Karina, Poynard Thierry

机构信息

BioPredictive, Paris 75007, France.

Department of Hepatology, Center for Diagnostics and Treatment of Liver Diseases, Moscow Clinical Scientific and Practical Center, Moscow 111123, Russia.

出版信息

World J Hepatol. 2025 Mar 27;17(3):104534. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v17.i3.104534.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Noninvasive tests are crucial for the management and follow-up of patients with autoimmune hepatitis, but their validation is limited because of insufficient data.

AIM

To investigate the diagnostic performance of three fibrosis noninvasive tests [FibroTest, vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE), and the fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) and two activity biomarkers (alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and ActiTest].

METHODS

This study enrolled 103 patients for whom liver biopsy, hepatic elastography results, and laboratory markers were available. Diagnostic performance was assessed with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, the Obuchowski measure (OM), and the Bayesian latent class model.

RESULTS

FibroTest and VCTE outperformed FIB-4 in cases of significant fibrosis (≥ F2), with areas under the ROC curve of 0.83 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.73-0.90], 0.86 (95%CI: 0.77-0.92), and 0.71 (95%CI: 0.60-0.80), respectively. The mean (standard error) OM values were 0.92 (0.01), 0.93 (0.01), and 0.88 (0.02) for FibroTest, VCTE, and FIB-4, respectively; FibroTest and VCTE performed comparably, and both were superior to FIB-4 ( = 0.03 and = 0.005). The areas under the ROC curve values for activity biomarkers were 0.86 (95%CI: 0.76-0.92) for ActiTest and 0.84 (95%CI: 0.73-0.90) for ALT ( = 0.06). The OM values for ActiTest and ALT were 0.92 (0.02) and 0.90 (0.02), respectively ( = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

FibroTest and VCTE outperformed FIB-4 according to the OM. FibroTest-ActiTest facilitated the evaluation of both fibrosis and activity.

摘要

背景

非侵入性检测对于自身免疫性肝炎患者的管理和随访至关重要,但由于数据不足,其验证受到限制。

目的

研究三种纤维化非侵入性检测方法[FibroTest、振动控制瞬时弹性成像(VCTE)和纤维化-4指数(FIB-4)]以及两种活动生物标志物[丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)和ActiTest]的诊断性能。

方法

本研究纳入了103例可获得肝活检、肝脏弹性成像结果和实验室指标的患者。采用受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线、奥布霍夫斯基测量法(OM)和贝叶斯潜在类别模型评估诊断性能。

结果

在显著纤维化(≥F2)病例中,FibroTest和VCTE的表现优于FIB-4,其ROC曲线下面积分别为0.83[95%置信区间(CI):0.73-0.90]、0.86(95%CI:0.77-0.92)和0.71(95%CI:0.60-0.80)。FibroTest、VCTE和FIB-4的平均(标准误)OM值分别为0.92(0.01)、0.93(0.01)和0.88(0.02);FibroTest和VCTE表现相当,且均优于FIB-4(P = 0.03和P = 0.005)。活动生物标志物的ROC曲线下面积值,ActiTest为0.86(95%CI:0.76-0.92),ALT为0.84(95%CI:0.73-0.90)(P = 0.06)。ActiTest和ALT的OM值分别为0.92(0.02)和0.90(0.02)(P = 0.005)。

结论

根据OM,FibroTest和VCTE的表现优于FIB-4。FibroTest-ActiTest有助于评估纤维化和活动情况。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验