• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

波塞冬1组和2组重复体外受精周期的促性腺激素剂量选择

Gonadotropin dose selection for repeat IVF cycles in POSEIDON Groups 1 and 2.

作者信息

Wei Hao, Duan JinLiang, Wang SiShi, Zhu BaoPing, Jiang HaiLing

机构信息

Reproductive Medical Center, The 924th Hospital of the Joint Logistic Support Force of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, Guilin, China.

出版信息

Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Jul 17;16:1591743. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1591743. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fendo.2025.1591743
PMID:40747307
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12310443/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Investigating whether increasing the dose of gonadotropins (Gn) in the second fertilization (IVF) cycle using the antagonist protocol could improve the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) in POSEIDON Groups 1 and 2.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 343 patients from POSEIDON Groups 1 and 2 who underwent two consecutive cycles of ovarian stimulation with an antagonist protocol between May 2018 and September 2022. Patients were divided into an Additive group (those who increased the Gn dosage in the second cycle) and a Control group (those who maintained or decreased the Gn dosage), with a 1:2 propensity score matching analysis. The primary outcome was the CLBR.

RESULTS

In the second IVF cycle, the Additive group had higher initial (191.8 vs 183.4, P=0.135) and total (2161.7 vs 1770.6, P=0.461) Gn doses compared to the Control group. The Additive group also had a higher average number of retrieved oocytes and Metaphase II (MII) oocytes, a higher two pronuclei (2PN) fertilization rate (3.3 vs 2.6, P=0.065), and higher blastocyst formation rates (44.9% vs 44.2%, P=0.937) compared to the Control group; however, these differences were not statistically significant. The Control group had a slightly higher CLBR (31.5% vs 28.9%, P=0.8), which was also not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

For POSEIDON Groups 1 and 2, increasing the dose of Gn under the antagonist protocol increased treatment costs but did not improve the CLBR. Routine increase of Gn dose was not recommended.

摘要

目的

研究在使用拮抗剂方案的第二次体外受精(IVF)周期中增加促性腺激素(Gn)剂量是否能提高波塞冬1组和2组的累积活产率(CLBR)。

方法

这项回顾性研究纳入了2018年5月至2022年9月期间来自波塞冬1组和2组的343例患者,这些患者接受了两个连续周期的拮抗剂方案卵巢刺激。患者被分为增加组(在第二个周期增加Gn剂量的患者)和对照组(维持或降低Gn剂量的患者),进行1:2倾向评分匹配分析。主要结局是CLBR。

结果

在第二次IVF周期中,与对照组相比,增加组的初始Gn剂量(191.8对183.4,P=0.135)和总Gn剂量(2161.7对1770.6,P=0.461)更高。增加组的平均取卵数和中期II(MII)卵母细胞数也更多,双原核(2PN)受精率更高(3.3对2.6,P=0.065),囊胚形成率也更高(44.9%对44.2%,P=0.937);然而,这些差异均无统计学意义。对照组的CLBR略高(31.5%对28.9%,P=0.8),同样无统计学意义。

结论

对于波塞冬1组和2组,在拮抗剂方案下增加Gn剂量会增加治疗成本,但并未提高CLBR。不建议常规增加Gn剂量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a45/12310443/21de58d18eba/fendo-16-1591743-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a45/12310443/21de58d18eba/fendo-16-1591743-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a45/12310443/21de58d18eba/fendo-16-1591743-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Gonadotropin dose selection for repeat IVF cycles in POSEIDON Groups 1 and 2.波塞冬1组和2组重复体外受精周期的促性腺激素剂量选择
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Jul 17;16:1591743. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1591743. eCollection 2025.
2
One-year cumulative live birth rate associated with the number of oocytes in ovarian stimulation with follitropin delta: a pooled analysis of four randomized controlled trials.与使用注射用重组促卵泡素δ进行卵巢刺激时的卵母细胞数量相关的一年累积活产率:四项随机对照试验的汇总分析
Hum Reprod. 2025 Aug 1;40(8):1526-1534. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaf111.
3
Oral medications including clomiphene citrate or aromatase inhibitors with gonadotropins for controlled ovarian stimulation in women undergoing in vitro fertilisation.口服药物,包括枸橼酸氯米芬或芳香化酶抑制剂与促性腺激素联合用于接受体外受精的女性的控制性卵巢刺激。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 2;11(11):CD008528. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008528.pub3.
4
Individualised gonadotropin dose selection using markers of ovarian reserve for women undergoing in vitro fertilisation plus intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI).针对接受体外受精加卵胞浆内单精子注射(IVF/ICSI)的女性,使用卵巢储备标志物进行个性化促性腺激素剂量选择。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 1;2(2):CD012693. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012693.pub2.
5
Analysis of cumulative live birth rate outcomes of four ovarian stimulation protocols in Poseidon groups 3/4 patients with adenomyosis.波塞冬3/4组子宫腺肌病患者四种卵巢刺激方案的累积活产率结果分析
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025 May 9. doi: 10.1007/s10815-025-03488-4.
6
In vitro fertilisation for unexplained subfertility.不明原因的亚生育力的体外受精。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 19;2015(11):CD003357. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003357.pub4.
7
Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist versus HCG for oocyte triggering in antagonist-assisted reproductive technology.在拮抗剂辅助生殖技术中,促性腺激素释放激素激动剂与绒毛膜促性腺激素用于卵母细胞触发的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 31;2014(10):CD008046. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008046.pub4.
8
Clomiphene citrate in combination with gonadotropins for controlled ovarian stimulation in women undergoing in vitro fertilization.枸橼酸氯米芬联合促性腺激素用于体外受精女性的控制性卵巢刺激。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11:CD008528. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008528.pub2.
9
Depot versus daily administration of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist protocols for pituitary down regulation in assisted reproduction cycles.长效注射与每日给药的促性腺激素释放激素激动剂方案用于辅助生殖周期中垂体降调节的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jan 31;2013(1):CD002808. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002808.pub3.
10
Shorter ovarian stimulation is detrimental to fresh embryo transfer outcomes in PCOS women undergoing GnRH antagonist protocol: a retrospective cohort study.在接受促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂方案的多囊卵巢综合征女性中,缩短卵巢刺激时间对新鲜胚胎移植结局不利:一项回顾性队列研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):21002. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-06217-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of follicle-stimulating hormone dose on the risk of being classified as suboptimal responders according to the POSEIDON criteria.根据POSEIDON标准,促卵泡激素剂量对被归类为次优反应者风险的影响。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024 Dec;41(12):3387-3398. doi: 10.1007/s10815-024-03296-2. Epub 2024 Oct 18.
2
Total gonadotropin dose did not affect euploid blastocyst rates: an analysis of more than 19,000 oocytes.总促性腺激素剂量并不影响整倍体囊胚率:对超过 19000 个卵母细胞的分析。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024 Sep;41(9):2385-2396. doi: 10.1007/s10815-024-03183-w. Epub 2024 Jul 13.
3
Effects of total gonadotropin dose on embryo quality and clinical outcomes with AMH stratification in IVF cycles: a retrospective analysis of 12,588 patients.
促性腺激素总剂量对 AMH 分层的 IVF 周期中胚胎质量和临床结局的影响:对 12588 例患者的回顾性分析。
Eur J Med Res. 2024 Mar 12;29(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-01768-w.
4
Expert consensus on the morphological evaluation of human cleavage-stage embryos and blastocysts.人类卵裂期胚胎和囊胚形态学评估专家共识
Chin Med J (Engl). 2023 May 5;136(9):1009-1011. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000002609.
5
Comparison of two different starting dose of rhFSH in GnRH antagonist protocol for patients with normal ovarian reserve.比较正常卵巢储备功能患者在 GnRH 拮抗剂方案中使用两种不同起始剂量 rhFSH。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Jan 20;14:1068141. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1068141. eCollection 2023.
6
What Does Unexpected Suboptimal Response During Ovarian Stimulation Suggest, an Overlooked Group?在卵巢刺激过程中出现意外的次优反应意味着什么,是否有被忽视的群体?
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Dec 22;12:795254. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.795254. eCollection 2021.
7
Can repeat IVF/ICSI cycles compensate for the natural decline in fertility with age? an estimate of cumulative live birth rates over multiple IVF/ICSI cycles in Chinese advanced-aged population.重复 IVF/ICSI 周期能否弥补随年龄增长而自然下降的生育能力?对中国高龄人群多次 IVF/ICSI 周期累积活产率的估计。
Aging (Albany NY). 2021 May 20;13(10):14385-14398. doi: 10.18632/aging.203055.
8
Low Prognosis by the POSEIDON Criteria in Women Undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Multicenter and Multinational Prevalence Study of Over 13,000 Patients.POSEIDON 标准预测行辅助生殖技术的女性预后不良:一项超过 13000 例患者的多中心、多国患病率研究。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Mar 12;12:630550. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.630550. eCollection 2021.
9
POSEIDON classification and the proposed treatment options for groups 1 and 2: time to revisit? A retrospective analysis of 1425 ART cycles.波塞冬分类法以及针对第1组和第2组的拟议治疗方案:是否需要重新审视?对1425个辅助生殖周期的回顾性分析
Hum Reprod Open. 2021 Feb 14;2021(1):hoaa070. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoaa070. eCollection 2021.
10
Comparison of pregnancy outcomes following preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy using a matched propensity score design.采用匹配倾向评分设计比较胚胎植入前遗传学检测非整倍体的妊娠结局。
Hum Reprod. 2020 Oct 1;35(10):2356-2364. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa161.