• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

瑞典版HLS19-Q12的验证:一种衡量一般健康素养的方法。

Validation of the Swedish version of HLS19-Q12: a measurement for general health literacy.

作者信息

Wångdahl Josefin, Jaensson Maria, Dahlberg Karina, Bergman Lina, Keller Celeste Roger, Doheny Megan, Agerholm Janne

机构信息

Aging Research Center, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Tomtebodavägen 18a, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.

Division of Nursing, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Alfred Nobels Allé 23, C2, 141 52 Huddinge, Sweden.

出版信息

Health Promot Int. 2025 Jul 1;40(4). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daaf132.

DOI:10.1093/heapro/daaf132
PMID:40747568
Abstract

Health literacy (HL) is a critical determinant of health, as it affects health behavior and outcomes, in addition to equity in health. This study aimed to translate, culturally adapt, and validate the Swedish version of HLS19-Q12 (HLS19-Q12-SE). The HLS19-Q12 is a widely used instrument that consists of 12-items and is often used to assess HL in Europe. A convergent mixed-methods design was applied, including cognitive interviews (n  =  8) and psychometric testing with a survey sample (n  =  374) and test-retest group (n  =  28). The instrument was forward and backwards translated and culturally adapted. Data was analyzed using confirmatory and exploratory factor analysis, correlation testing, and reliability assessments. Cognitive interviews explored the clarity, interpretation, and contextual relevance of the items. Participants found the HLS19-Q12-SE clear and easy to understand, though some reported difficulties with unfamiliar health situations and uncertainty of the term "health information." Based on the interviews, the examples for one of the items were culturally adapted. Psychometric testing showed good feasibility, no floor or ceiling effects on scale level, and moderate positive correlations with other HL instruments, supporting internal and external validity. Structural validity was confirmed, and internal consistency and test-retest reliability were satisfactory. However, ceiling effects were observed at the dichotomous item level, and correlations with self-rated health and social status were low. The HLS19-Q12-SE is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing general HL in Sweden. While psychometric properties were strong overall, future research should address ceiling effects on item level and explore the instrument's performance in more diverse populations.

摘要

健康素养(HL)是健康的关键决定因素,因为它不仅影响健康公平性,还会影响健康行为和结果。本研究旨在翻译、进行文化调适并验证瑞典语版的HLS19-Q12(HLS19-Q12-SE)。HLS19-Q12是一种广泛使用的工具,由12个项目组成,常用于欧洲评估健康素养。本研究采用了收敛性混合方法设计,包括认知访谈(n = 8)以及对一个调查样本(n = 374)和重测组(n = 28)进行心理测量测试。该工具进行了正向和反向翻译,并进行了文化调适。使用验证性和探索性因素分析、相关性测试以及可靠性评估对数据进行了分析。认知访谈探讨了项目的清晰度、解释以及情境相关性。参与者认为HLS19-Q12-SE清晰易懂,不过一些人表示在面对不熟悉的健康状况以及“健康信息”一词的不确定性方面存在困难。基于访谈结果,对其中一个项目的示例进行了文化调适。心理测量测试显示出良好的可行性,在量表层面没有地板效应或天花板效应,并且与其他健康素养工具存在中度正相关,支持了内部和外部效度。结构效度得到了确认,内部一致性和重测信度令人满意。然而,在二分法项目层面观察到了天花板效应,并且与自评健康和社会地位的相关性较低。HLS19-Q12-SE是评估瑞典一般健康素养的可靠且有效的工具。虽然心理测量特性总体上很强,但未来的研究应解决项目层面的天花板效应,并探索该工具在更多样化人群中的表现。

相似文献

1
Validation of the Swedish version of HLS19-Q12: a measurement for general health literacy.瑞典版HLS19-Q12的验证:一种衡量一般健康素养的方法。
Health Promot Int. 2025 Jul 1;40(4). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daaf132.
2
Adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the digital addiction scale for children (DASC).儿童数字成瘾量表中文版(DASC)的改编与验证
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 30;25(1):2599. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23817-7.
3
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
4
Adaptation, further development and evaluation of the measurement properties of the person-centred community care inventory (PERCCI-S) for use in the Swedish municipal health care system.以个人为中心的社区护理量表(PERCCI-S)在瑞典市政医疗保健系统中的测量属性的适应性、进一步开发及评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jul 30;25(1):1004. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13178-7.
5
Is It Possible to Develop a Patient-reported Experience Measure With Lower Ceiling Effect?是否有可能开发一种天花板效应较低的患者报告体验测量方法?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):693-703. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003262. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
6
Quality of Life Among Family Caregivers of Individuals With Rare Diseases: Web-Based Population Study on the Validity and Reliability of the Polish World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF Questionnaire.罕见病患者家庭照顾者的生活质量:基于网络的波兰世界卫生组织生活质量简表问卷有效性和可靠性的人群研究
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2025 Jul 18;11:e72590. doi: 10.2196/72590.
7
A systematic review of tools designed for teacher proxy-report of children's physical literacy or constituting elements.系统评价教师代理报告儿童身体素养或构成要素的工具。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Oct 8;18(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01162-3.
8
Development and Preliminary Evaluation of a Food Literacy Measure for Use With Young People in Canada.加拿大青少年食品素养测量方法的开发与初步评估
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2025 Jul;125(7):1009-1023. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2024.10.021. Epub 2024 Nov 4.
9
Validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the autism spectrum knowledge scale.自闭症谱系知识量表土耳其语版本的效度和信度研究
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2025 Jun 25;258:105204. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105204.
10
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the pros and cons of anorexia nervosa (P-CAN-C) scale: a validation study in patients with anorexia nervosa.神经性厌食症利弊中文版量表(P-CAN-C)的心理测量学特性:一项针对神经性厌食症患者的效度研究
J Eat Disord. 2025 Jun 16;13(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s40337-025-01314-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Psychometric validation of the French version of two scales measuring general (HLS-Q12) and navigational (HLS-NAV) health literacy using the Rasch model.使用 Rasch 模型对测量一般健康素养(HLS-Q12)和导航健康素养(HLS-NAV)的两种量表的法语版进行心理测量验证。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Nov 7;24(1):3079. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20504-x.
2
Validating the short-version European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire for community-dwelling older adults in Japan.验证适用于日本社区居住老年人的短版本欧洲健康素养调查问卷。
Health Promot Int. 2024 Aug 1;39(4). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daae105.
3
Measuring General Health Literacy in Chinese adults: validation of the HLS-Q12 instrument.
测量中国成年人的一般健康素养:HLS-Q12 工具的验证。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Apr 15;24(1):1036. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-17977-1.
4
Spanish version of the short European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire HLS-Q12: Transcultural adaptation and psychometric properties.短欧洲健康素养调查问卷 HLS-Q12 的西班牙语版:跨文化适应和心理测量特性。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 29;19(2):e0299736. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299736. eCollection 2024.
5
Interventions for improving health literacy in migrants.改善移民健康素养的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 14;11(11):CD013303. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013303.pub2.
6
Validity and reliability of the swedish versions of the HLS-EU-Q16 and HLS-EU-Q6 questionnaires.HLS-EU-Q16 和 HLS-EU-Q6 问卷瑞典语版本的有效性和可靠性。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Apr 20;23(1):724. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15519-9.
7
Validity and reliability of the arabic version of the HLS-EU-Q16 and HLS-EU-Q6 questionnaires.HLS-EU-Q16 和 HLS-EU-Q6 问卷的阿拉伯语版本的有效性和可靠性。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Feb 10;23(1):304. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15226-5.
8
Associations of health literacy with self-management behaviours and health outcomes in chronic kidney disease: a systematic review.健康素养与慢性肾脏病自我管理行为和健康结局的关系:系统评价。
J Nephrol. 2023 Jun;36(5):1267-1281. doi: 10.1007/s40620-022-01537-0. Epub 2023 Jan 16.
9
Measuring Comprehensive, General Health Literacy in the General Adult Population: The Development and Validation of the HLS-Q12 Instrument in Seventeen Countries.测量一般成年人群的综合一般健康素养:在 17 个国家开发和验证 HLS-Q12 工具。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 29;19(21):14129. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114129.
10
Measuring health literacy: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis of instruments from 1993 to 2021.测量健康素养:1993 年至 2021 年工具的系统评价和文献计量分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 15;17(7):e0271524. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271524. eCollection 2022.