Herdon H, Strupish J, Nahorski S R
Brain Res. 1985 Dec 2;348(2):309-20. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(85)90450-0.
Direct comparisons between radiolabelled and endogenous dopamine (DA) release from superfused rat brain slices have been made. Striatal slices were prelabelled with [3H]dopamine ([3H]DA), then superfused at 0.5 ml/min and the released catecholamines analyzed by HPLC with electrochemical detection and the radioactivity present in superfusate fractions also counted. Two successive 50 mM K+ pulses released similar amounts of endogenous DA from striatal slices, but the second pulse released 50% less [3H]DA than the first. A K+ gradient (5-53 mM) released relatively more [3H]DA compared to endogenous DA at lower K+ than at higher K+ concentrations. Blockade of DA synthesis in vitro by 50 microM a-methyl-p-tyrosine greatly reduced K+-induced endogenous DA release without any major effect on [3H]DA release. Amphetamine (10 microM) greatly increased both basal DA release and release induced by a 5 microM veratrine pulse, but its effects were 3-4 times greater on endogenous than on [3H]DA release. Although a-methyl-p-tyrosine reduced both basal and veratrine-stimulated endogenous DA release from non-prelabelled tissue by over 50% in either the presence or absence of amphetamine, it did not decrease endogenous DA release from prelabelled tissue. These studies indicate that labelled and endogenous amine release do not always occur in parallel, and that major causes of discrepancy between them may include the presence of a large newly-synthesized component in endogenous release and the uneven distribution of labelled amine within endogenous releasable pools. The results also suggest that the prelabelling process itself may alter the pools contributing to subsequent endogenous release. In the light of these studies, the assumption that labelled amine release provides an accurate marker for endogenous release should be reconsidered.
已对放射性标记的多巴胺(DA)与从灌注大鼠脑片释放的内源性多巴胺之间进行了直接比较。纹状体切片先用[³H]多巴胺([³H]DA)进行预标记,然后以0.5毫升/分钟的速度进行灌注,并通过高效液相色谱-电化学检测法分析释放的儿茶酚胺,同时对灌注液馏分中的放射性进行计数。两个连续的50 mM K⁺脉冲从纹状体切片中释放出相似量的内源性DA,但第二个脉冲释放的[³H]DA比第一个少50%。与较高K⁺浓度相比,在较低K⁺浓度下,K⁺梯度(5 - 53 mM)释放出相对更多的[³H]DA。50 μM α-甲基-p-酪氨酸在体外阻断DA合成,极大地减少了K⁺诱导的内源性DA释放,而对[³H]DA释放没有任何重大影响。苯丙胺(10 μM)极大地增加了基础DA释放以及由5 μM藜芦碱脉冲诱导的释放,但其对内源性DA释放的影响比对[³H]DA释放的影响大3 - 4倍。尽管α-甲基-p-酪氨酸在有或没有苯丙胺的情况下,都使来自未预标记组织的基础和藜芦碱刺激的内源性DA释放减少了50%以上,但它并没有减少来自预标记组织的内源性DA释放。这些研究表明,标记的胺释放和内源性胺释放并不总是平行发生,它们之间差异的主要原因可能包括内源性释放中存在大量新合成成分以及标记胺在可内源性释放池中的分布不均。结果还表明,预标记过程本身可能会改变对随后内源性释放有贡献的池。鉴于这些研究,应重新考虑标记胺释放为内源性释放提供准确标记的假设。