Marchetti Matteo, Vezzaro Tommaso, Carollo Massimo, Facchetti Emma, Masatti Laura, Xhindoli Livia, Costeniero Diletta, Maggino Tiziano, Tozzi Roberto, Saccardi Carlo, Noventa Marco, Spagnol Giulia
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Department of Women and Children's Health, University of Padua, Italy.
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Department of Women and Children's Health, University of Padua, Italy.
Gynecol Oncol. 2025 Aug 1;200:145-154. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2025.07.020.
In this study, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of molecular alterations beyond those included in the Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer (ProMisE), in order to identify biomarkers that could improve prognostic stratification within the No Specific Molecular Profile (NSMP) subgroup of endometrial cancers.
This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. We searched PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science for studies published up to December 2024. We included prospective and retrospective studies assessing the prognostic impact of molecular alterations not included in the ProMisE classification, reporting outcomes as hazard ratios (HRs). The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary outcome was overall survival (OS), analyzed in both the overall endometrial cancer population and specifically within the NSMP subgroup.
A total of 19 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis: 17 retrospective and 2 prospective, all observational in design. L1CAM overexpression and ER loss were identified as unfavorable prognostic factors in the overall endometrial cancer population (PFS HR 3.44 [2.57, 4.59; 95 % CI] and 3.13 [2.45, 4.00; 95 % CI], respectively) and within the NSMP subgroup (PFS HR 3.34 [2.05, 5.44; 95 % CI] and 3.14 [2.00, 4.91; 95 % CI], respectively). ARID1A mutation showed a negative prognostic impact limited to NSMPs (PFS HR 2.35 [1.09, 5.06; 95 % CI]). Conversely, β-catenin/CTNNB1 and PIK3CA/PTEN mutations did not demonstrate consistent prognostic significance in either group.
These findings underscore the potential of ER loss and L1CAM overexpression as prognostic markers within the NSMP subgroup, supporting more personalized adjuvant strategies. Further research is needed to clarify the prognostic role of other alterations, such as ARID1A, specifically within NSMP tumors. PROSPERO registration number: CRD420250654207.
在本研究中,我们旨在评估子宫内膜癌主动分子风险分类器(ProMisE)所涵盖之外的分子改变对预后的影响,以确定能够改善子宫内膜癌无特定分子谱(NSMP)亚组预后分层的生物标志物。
本系统评价和荟萃分析按照PRISMA指南进行。我们在PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science上检索截至2024年12月发表的研究。我们纳入了评估ProMisE分类未涵盖的分子改变对预后影响的前瞻性和回顾性研究,将结果报告为风险比(HRs)。主要结局是无进展生存期(PFS),次要结局是总生存期(OS),在整个子宫内膜癌人群以及特别是NSMP亚组中进行分析。
共有19项研究符合纳入标准并纳入最终分析:17项回顾性研究和2项前瞻性研究,均为观察性设计。L1CAM过表达和雌激素受体(ER)缺失被确定为整个子宫内膜癌人群(PFS的HR分别为3.44 [2.57, 4.59;95%置信区间]和3.13 [2.45, 4.00;95%置信区间])以及NSMP亚组(PFS的HR分别为3.34 [2.05, 5.44;95%置信区间]和3.14 [2.00, 4.91;95%置信区间])的不良预后因素。ARID1A突变显示出仅限于NSMP的负面预后影响(PFS的HR为2.35 [1.09, 5.06;95%置信区间])。相反,β-连环蛋白/CTNNB1和PIK3CA/PTEN突变在两组中均未显示出一致的预后意义。
这些发现强调了ER缺失和L1CAM过表达作为NSMP亚组预后标志物的潜力,支持更具个性化的辅助治疗策略。需要进一步研究以阐明其他改变(如ARID1A)在NSMP肿瘤中的预后作用。PROSPERO注册号:CRD420250654207。