Shawler Avery L, Barker Kristin J, Xu Wenjing, Mills Kenneth J, Mong Tony W, Middleton Arthur D
Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA; Western Landowners Alliance, Denver, CO 80227, USA.
Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA; Beyond Yellowstone Living Lab, Cody, WY 82414, USA.
Curr Biol. 2025 Aug 18;35(16):4035-4042.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2025.07.015. Epub 2025 Aug 1.
Some predators move long distances to track migratory prey. This phenomenon, known as migratory coupling, has been observed in wolves that track migratory caribou in the Arctic. By contrast, most wolves elsewhere are highly territorial and thought to be non-migratory-particularly during the denning and pup-rearing season. Recent advances in wildlife tracking have illuminated widespread individual variation in seasonal movements of partially migratory prey, but little is known about how wolves respond to such varied behaviors. Using concurrent GPS data (2019-2021) from 19 gray wolves (Canis lupus) and 99 elk (Cervus canadensis) from a large, partially migratory herd in the eastern Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem, we quantified wolf movement strategies based on overlaps between wolf packs' seasonal ranges and between wolf and elk summer ranges. We found that wolves exhibited a range of movement responses, including migrating, commuting, and remaining resident. Additionally, some packs moved pups from den sites to rendezvous sites along elk migration routes, or even within elk summer range, challenging the long-accepted notion that juvenile carnivores act as spatial anchors. The diverse strategies wolves employ to track migratory prey highlight how the plasticity and variation of migratory behaviors in their ungulate prey can translate to dynamic wolf space use. This suggests that changes in ungulate mobility-for instance, due to climate or land-use change-may reverberate across trophic levels, reshaping predator movement patterns and influencing broader ecosystem dynamics.
一些捕食者会长途迁徙以追踪迁徙的猎物。这种现象被称为迁徙耦合,在北极追踪迁徙驯鹿的狼身上就有观察到。相比之下,其他地方的大多数狼都具有很强的领地意识,被认为是不迁徙的,尤其是在筑巢和育幼季节。野生动物追踪技术的最新进展揭示了部分迁徙猎物季节性移动中广泛存在的个体差异,但对于狼如何应对这种多样的行为却知之甚少。利用来自大黄石生态系统东部一个大型部分迁徙鹿群的19只灰狼(Canis lupus)和99只麋鹿(Cervus canadensis)的同步GPS数据(2019 - 2021年),我们根据狼群的季节性活动范围之间以及狼与麋鹿夏季活动范围之间的重叠情况,对狼的移动策略进行了量化。我们发现狼表现出一系列移动反应,包括迁徙、往返移动和定居。此外,一些狼群会沿着麋鹿迁徙路线,甚至在麋鹿夏季活动范围内,将幼崽从巢穴转移到集合地点,这挑战了长期以来被接受的观点,即幼年食肉动物是空间的固定点。狼追踪迁徙猎物所采用的多样策略凸显了它们有蹄类猎物迁徙行为的可塑性和变异性如何转化为狼动态的空间利用方式。这表明有蹄类动物移动性的变化——例如,由于气候或土地利用变化——可能会在营养级间产生回响,重塑捕食者的移动模式并影响更广泛的生态系统动态。