Kisecik Sengul Zeynep, Kilicarslan Ebru
Department of Pediatric Nursing, Health Sciences Faculty, Kirikkale University, Kirikkale, Türkiye.
Department of Pediatric Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Gazi University, Ankara, Türkiye.
BMC Psychol. 2025 Aug 2;13(1):857. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-03163-4.
To determine the effectiveness of the technology-based motivation program implemented with children with cancer diagnosis and their primary caregivers.
A randomized controlled trial completed with 31 children aged between 9 and 18 being treated for cancer, and 31 primary caregivers. A 10-week “Technology-based Motivation Program” was applied to the intervention group, while the control group received routine care. The program consisted of breathing, progressive relaxation exercises, imagery practices and stories for children. Primary caregivers were provided with breathing and progressive relaxation exercises. ‘State/ Trait Anxiety Inventory for Children’, ‘Paediatric Quality of Life Inventory’, ‘Paediatric Cancer Coping Scale’, ‘State and Trait Anxiety Inventory’ and ‘Process Evaluation Forms’ were administered. Chi-square test, Fisher-Exact test, Independent Sample-t test, Mann–Whitney U test, Wilcoxon test, Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients were used to evaluate the data.
At baseline, there were no statistically significant differences between the intervention and control groups in any of the scale scores, including children’s anxiety, coping skills, and quality of life, as well as primary caregivers’ anxiety levels ( > 0.05 for all comparisons). At the end of the program, State anxiety scores of the children in the intervention group were significantly lower (29.27 ± 8.13) than those of the control group (37.18 ± 9.01) ( < 0.05). Furthermore, the coping scores of the children in the intervention group were found to be significantly higher (80.20 ± 9.62) than those of the control group (67.56 ± 17.44) ( < 0.05). At the end of the program, the average state anxiety scores of primary caregivers in the intervention group (33.73 ± 12.30) were also significantly lower than those in the control group (53,31 ± 15,14) ( < 0.05). Similarly, the trait anxiety scores of primary caregivers in the intervention group (39.80 ± 9.43) were significantly lower than those of the control group (52,50 ± 16,57) ( < 0.05).
A technology-based motivation program implemented with children and their primary caregivers following a cancer diagnosis is effective in reducing anxiety, increasing quality of life, and coping.
Trials.gov Registration number: (NCT05982379||https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/). Date of registration: 01/08/2023.
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40359-025-03163-4.
确定对癌症确诊儿童及其主要照顾者实施的基于技术的激励计划的有效性。
对31名年龄在9至18岁正在接受癌症治疗的儿童及其31名主要照顾者进行了一项随机对照试验。对干预组实施了为期10周的“基于技术的激励计划”,而对照组接受常规护理。该计划包括呼吸练习、渐进性放松练习、意象练习和儿童故事。为主要照顾者提供了呼吸和渐进性放松练习。使用了“儿童状态/特质焦虑量表”、“儿童生活质量量表”、“儿童癌症应对量表”、“状态和特质焦虑量表”以及“过程评估表”。采用卡方检验、Fisher精确检验、独立样本t检验、曼-惠特尼U检验、威尔科克森检验、皮尔逊和斯皮尔曼相关系数来评估数据。
在基线时,干预组和对照组在任何量表得分上均无统计学显著差异,包括儿童的焦虑、应对技能和生活质量,以及主要照顾者的焦虑水平(所有比较均>0.05)。在计划结束时,干预组儿童的状态焦虑得分(29.27±8.13)显著低于对照组(37.18±9.01)(<0.05)。此外,发现干预组儿童的应对得分(80.20±9.62)显著高于对照组(67.56±17.44)(<0.05)。在计划结束时,干预组主要照顾者的平均状态焦虑得分(33.73±12.30)也显著低于对照组(53.31±15.14)(<0.05)。同样,干预组主要照顾者的特质焦虑得分(39.80±9.43)显著低于对照组(52.50±16.57)(<0.05)。
对癌症确诊后的儿童及其主要照顾者实施的基于技术的激励计划在减轻焦虑、提高生活质量和增强应对能力方面是有效的。
Trials.gov注册号:(NCT05982379||https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/)。注册日期:2023年8月1日。
在线版本包含可在10.1186/s40359-025-03163-4获取的补充材料。