Wang Chengjing, Li Changqing
Department of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Aug 2;20(1):726. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-06061-y.
Olecranon fractures represent a significant challenge in orthopedic trauma, and multiple surgical fixation techniques are available. While tension band wiring (TBW) has been the traditional standard, modern techniques have emerged, including Cable-pin Systems, plate fixation, and novel approaches. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the comparative effectiveness of these fixation methods in terms of functional outcomes, healing time, and complications.
A comprehensive systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases from January 2013 to February 2025. We included randomized controlled trials and comparative cohort studies evaluating surgical fixation techniques for adult olecranon fractures. Primary outcomes included the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score, range of motion, fracture healing time, and complications. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models, with pre-specified subgroup analyses based on fixation techniques and patient characteristics.
Nine studies involving 472 patients met the inclusion criteria. Modern fixation techniques demonstrated superior functional outcomes compared to traditional TBW, with the Cable-pin System showing significantly higher MEPS scores (mean difference = 13.03 points; 95% CI [10.89, 15.17]; p < 0.001). The Cable-pin System appeared to achieve the fastest healing time (8.90 weeks; 95% CI [7.53, 10.27]), significantly shorter than traditional TBW (12.60 weeks; 95% CI [12.08, 13.12]). Modern techniques appeared to show substantially lower complication rates (RR = 0.11; 95% CI [0.00, 0.34]; p < 0.001), particularly in hardware-related complications. Temporal analysis indicated that risk reduction with modern techniques increases progressively during follow-up, with 24-month hardware-related complication-free survival of 94.2% for the Cable-pin System versus 58.4% for traditional TBW. Patient age emerged as a significant predictor of postoperative complications, with each additional year increasing complication risk by 1.19%.
Modern fixation techniques may offer superior functional outcomes, faster healing, and fewer complications than traditional tension band wiring for olecranon fractures. Cable-pin System appears optimal for simple fractures, while Eyelet K-wire System shows advantages for comminuted fractures. However, substantial heterogeneity (I > 70%) limits the certainty of findings. Treatment selection should consider patient age, bone quality, and fracture complexity. Larger standardized trials are needed to confirm these preliminary conclusions and refine evidence-based treatment algorithms.
鹰嘴骨折是骨科创伤中的一项重大挑战,有多种手术固定技术可供选择。虽然张力带钢丝固定术(TBW)一直是传统的标准方法,但现代技术已经出现,包括缆钉系统、钢板固定和新颖的方法。本系统评价和荟萃分析评估了这些固定方法在功能结局、愈合时间和并发症方面的比较效果。
于2013年1月至2025年2月在PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆和Web of Science数据库中进行了全面的系统检索。我们纳入了评估成人鹰嘴骨折手术固定技术的随机对照试验和比较队列研究。主要结局包括梅奥肘关节功能评分(MEPS)、上肢、肩部和手部功能障碍(DASH)评分、活动范围、骨折愈合时间和并发症。使用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析,并根据固定技术和患者特征进行预先指定的亚组分析。
9项涉及472例患者的研究符合纳入标准。与传统的张力带钢丝固定术相比,现代固定技术显示出更好的功能结局,缆钉系统的MEPS评分显著更高(平均差=13.03分;95%CI[10.89,15.17];p<0.001)。缆钉系统似乎实现了最快的愈合时间(8.90周;95%CI[7.53,10.27]),明显短于传统的张力带钢丝固定术(12.60周;95%CI[12.08,13.12])。现代技术似乎显示出显著更低的并发症发生率(RR=0.11;95%CI[0.00,0.34];p<0.001),尤其是在与内固定相关的并发症方面。时间分析表明,现代技术在随访期间降低风险的作用逐渐增加,缆钉系统24个月无内固定相关并发症的生存率为94.2%,而传统张力带钢丝固定术为58.4%。患者年龄是术后并发症的一个重要预测因素,每增加一岁并发症风险增加1.19%。
对于鹰嘴骨折,现代固定技术可能比传统的张力带钢丝固定术提供更好的功能结局、更快的愈合和更少的并发症。缆钉系统似乎对简单骨折最为理想,而带孔克氏针系统在粉碎性骨折方面显示出优势。然而,显著的异质性(I>70%)限制了研究结果的确定性。治疗选择应考虑患者年龄、骨质和骨折复杂性。需要更大规模的标准化试验来证实这些初步结论并完善基于证据的治疗算法。