Comparison of real-world outcomes between nivolumab plus ipilimumab and lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab or nivolumab plus cabozantinib combination therapies for previously untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND

Data regarding a direct comparison of outcomes between nivolumab plus ipilimumab (N-I) and lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab (L-P) or nivolumab plus cabozantinib (NC) combination therapies for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are limited. We compared treatment outcomes between N-I and L-P/NC in previously untreated advanced RCC.

METHODS

The clinical data of 194 patients receiving N-I (n = 109) and L-P/NC (n = 85) as first-line therapies for advanced RCC were retrospectively assessed.

RESULTS

According to the inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis, progression-free survival (PFS) was longer (median: 26.0 vs. 9.0 months, P = 0.0024) and the objective response rate (ORR) was higher (61.4% vs. 45.6%, P = 0.031) in the L-P/NC group than in the N-I group, whereas no significant difference was observed in overall survival between the groups (median: not reached vs. 56.0 months, P = 0.193). The rates of adverse events (AEs) (97.4% vs. 78.8%, P < 0.0001) and treatment interruption (70.5% vs. 51.1%, P = 0.007) were higher in the L-P/NC group than in the N-I group. The rate of glucocorticoid requirement was higher in the N-I group than in the L-P/NC group (43.8% vs. 27.5%, P = 0.023).

CONCLUSION

L-P/NC exhibited superior PFS and ORR compared with N-I in patients with advanced RCC. The L-P/NC group harbored a higher risk of AEs and treatment withdrawal, whereas the rate of glucocorticoid requirement was higher in the N-I group. Understanding the outcome characteristics of each immuno-oncology combination therapy will help to provide optimal and individualized treatment strategies.