Ning J, Wang H, Luo S, Jing J, Wang J, Hou H, Liu M
Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Beijing 100005, China.
Peking Union Medical College & Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China.
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2025 Aug 18;57(4):633-643. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2025.04.002.
To investigate the relationship between oxidative stress-related genes and prostate cancer (PCa) from a multi-omics perspective using summary-data-based Mendelian randomization (SMR), colocalization analysis, and cellular experiments.
Summary-level data on DNA methylation, gene expression, and circulating proteins were obtained and filtered. The PRACTICAL consortium was used as the discovery cohort, with the deCODE database serving as the validation cohort. SMR analysis and heterogeneity in dependent instruments (HEIDI) tests were conducted to assess the association and heterogeneity between oxidative stress-related genes and PCa. Colocalization analysis was performed to determine whether oxidative stress-related genes and PCa shared common causal variants. Finally, CCK-8 assays, wound healing assays, and Transwell invasion assays and Western blotting, were conducted to examine the effects of oxidative stress-related genes on the biological behavior of the PCa cell line C4-2.
Multi-omics analysis identified as significantly associated with increased PCa risk across gene methylation, gene expression, and circulating protein levels. showed significant associations at the methylation and protein levels, while was associated at the protein level. At the methylation level, sites cg00581603 (=1.11, 95%: 1.05-1.17) and cg13078931 (=1.12, 95%: 1.05-1.18) were identified as pathogenic. Among the four methylation sites in , only cg05244766 (=0.89, 95%: 0.84-0.95) was considered protective. At the gene expression level, (=1.05, 95%: 1.02-1.07) was also found to be a pathogenic factor. At the circulating protein level, (=2.10, 95%: 1.34-3.29) showed a consistent pathogenic trend. In addition, (=1.16, 95%: 1.07-1.25) and (=1.12, 95%: 1.05-1.19) were significantly associated with increased PCa risk. Further functional assays demonstrated that knockdown of significantly reduced the oncogenic phenotype of prostate cancer cells.
Through integrated multi-omics analysis and experimental validation, this study confirmed a significant association between and increased PCa risk. These findings enhance our understanding of PCa pathogenesis and provide new potential targets and therapeutic directions for PCa treatment.
采用基于汇总数据的孟德尔随机化(SMR)、共定位分析和细胞实验,从多组学角度研究氧化应激相关基因与前列腺癌(PCa)之间的关系。
获取并筛选DNA甲基化、基因表达和循环蛋白的汇总水平数据。PRACTICAL联盟用作发现队列,deCODE数据库用作验证队列。进行SMR分析和依赖工具中的异质性(HEIDI)检验,以评估氧化应激相关基因与PCa之间的关联和异质性。进行共定位分析,以确定氧化应激相关基因与PCa是否共享共同的因果变异。最后,进行CCK-8测定、伤口愈合测定、Transwell侵袭测定和蛋白质印迹,以检测氧化应激相关基因对PCa细胞系C4-2生物学行为的影响。
多组学分析确定在基因甲基化、基因表达和循环蛋白水平上与PCa风险增加显著相关。在甲基化和蛋白水平上显示出显著关联,而在蛋白水平上相关。在甲基化水平上,位点cg00581603(=1.11,95%置信区间:1.05-1.17)和cg13078931(=1.12,95%置信区间:1.05-1.18)被确定为致病性位点。在中的四个甲基化位点中,只有cg05244766(=0.89,95%置信区间:0.84-0.95)被认为具有保护作用。在基因表达水平上,(=1.05,95%置信区间:1.02-1.07)也被发现是一个致病因素。在循环蛋白水平上,(=2.10,95%置信区间:1.34-3.29)显示出一致的致病趋势。此外,(=1.16,95%置信区间:1.07-1.25)和(=1.12,95%置信区间:1.05-1.19)与PCa风险增加显著相关。进一步的功能测定表明,敲低显著降低了前列腺癌细胞的致癌表型。
通过综合多组学分析和实验验证,本研究证实了与PCa风险增加之间存在显著关联。这些发现加深了我们对PCa发病机制的理解,并为PCa治疗提供了新的潜在靶点和治疗方向。