Suppr超能文献

硬性输尿管镜激光碎石术联合N型圈套器治疗最大径≥1.5cm输尿管结石的疗效

[Efficacy of rigid ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy combined with N-trap in the treatment of ureteral stones with a maximum diameter equal to or greater than 1.5 cm].

作者信息

Ji J, Lin X, Pan D, Wu Z, Xue Z, Tian X, Zhang S, Wang B, Qiu M

机构信息

Department of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.

出版信息

Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2025 Aug 18;57(4):676-683. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2025.04.008.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy of rigid ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy combined with N-trap (RULL + N-trap), which is scoop-shaped, in the treatment of ureteral stones with a maximum diameter ≥ 1.5 cm.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included patients diagnosed with ureteral calculi who underwent rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy (RULL) combined with N-Trap stone entrapment system at the Department of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, by the same surgical team between June 2021 and September 2024. A total of 364 patients were initially enrolled. After excluding 21 patients due to missing critical outcome variables, two distinct cohorts were established: 38 patients with ureteral stones measuring ≥1.5 cm in maximum diameter, and 305 patients with stones < 1.5 cm in maximum diameter. To minimize selection bias and control for confounding variables, propensity score matching (PSM) was employed. This resulted in two well-balanced groups: 31 patients with stones ≥1.5 cm in maximum diameter and 31 patients with stones < 1.5 cm in maximum diameter, matched on baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. The primary outcomes assessed between the two groups included stone clearance. Secondary outcomes included changes in renal function indicators, specifically serum creatinine (SCr) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and other factors like postoperative hospital stay and operative time.

RESULTS

In the matched cohort, the patients with stones ≥1.5 cm in maximum diameter had significantly longer operative time compared with those with smaller stones: (85.8±28.8) min (62.4±24.6) min ( < 0.05). Postoperative length of hospital stay showed no significant difference: (2.26±1.79) d (2.03 ± 0.80) d (>0.05). The stone clearance on postoperative day one was 90.3% in the study group 100.0% in the control group (>0.05). One month postoperatively, the stone clearance was 93.5% 100.0%, respectively (>0.05). Changes in SCr were (-6.58±16.10) μmol/L . (-13.70±12.50) μmol/L, and changes in GFR were (5.92±14.90) mL/(min·1.73 m) . (7.47±11.20) mL/(min·1.73 m), with no statistically significant differences observed between the two groups for either renal function marker ( > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Ureteroscopic lithotripsy combined with N-trap is an optional method for treating ureteral stones with a maximum diameter ≥1.5 cm. The overall therapeutic efficacy is comparable, with the added benefit of significantly reducing the economic burden on patients.

摘要

目的

探讨刚性输尿管镜激光碎石术联合勺形N-trap(RULL+N-trap)治疗最大直径≥1.5 cm输尿管结石的疗效。

方法

这项回顾性队列研究纳入了2021年6月至2024年9月期间在北京大学第三医院泌尿外科由同一手术团队进行刚性输尿管镜碎石术(RULL)联合N-Trap结石圈套系统治疗的输尿管结石患者。最初共纳入364例患者。在排除21例因关键结局变量缺失的患者后,建立了两个不同的队列:38例最大直径≥1.5 cm的输尿管结石患者和305例最大直径<1.5 cm的结石患者。为尽量减少选择偏倚并控制混杂变量,采用了倾向评分匹配(PSM)。这产生了两个平衡良好的组:31例最大直径≥1.5 cm的结石患者和31例最大直径<1.5 cm的结石患者,根据基线人口统计学和临床特征进行匹配。两组间评估的主要结局包括结石清除率。次要结局包括肾功能指标的变化,具体为血清肌酐(SCr)和估计肾小球滤过率(GFR),以及其他因素,如术后住院时间和手术时间。

结果

在匹配队列中,最大直径≥1.5 cm的结石患者的手术时间明显长于结石较小的患者:(8

相似文献

4
Ureteroscopy vs Shockwave Lithotripsy to Remove Kidney Stones in Children and Adolescents: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Aug 1;8(8):e2525789. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.25789.
5
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus ureteroscopic management for ureteric calculi.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 May 16;2012(5):CD006029. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006029.pub4.
6
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus ureteroscopic management for ureteric calculi.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Dec 7(12):CD006029. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006029.pub3.
7
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment of renal stones in adults.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 13;11(11):CD013445. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013445.pub2.
8
Management of urinary stones by experts in stone disease (ESD 2025).
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2025 Jun 30;97(2):14085. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2025.14085.
9
Safety and efficacy of ureteroscopic lithotripsy for stone disease in obese patients: a systematic review of the literature.
BJU Int. 2012 Oct;110(8 Pt B):E374-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11086.x. Epub 2012 Apr 3.
10
Application of Catheter-Assisted Circulation System in Ureteroscopic Holmium Laser Lithotripsy.
J Endourol. 2025 Jun;39(6):518-524. doi: 10.1089/end.2024.0770. Epub 2025 Apr 29.

本文引用的文献

3
Predicting failed access in unstented ureteroscopy.
Urolithiasis. 2023 Feb 28;51(1):41. doi: 10.1007/s00240-023-01410-0.
5
Epidemiology of stone disease across the world.
World J Urol. 2017 Sep;35(9):1301-1320. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2008-6. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
6
Risk factors for sepsis after percutaneous renal stone surgery.
Nat Rev Urol. 2013 Oct;10(10):598-605. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2013.183. Epub 2013 Sep 3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验