El Khatib Omar, Hisham Mohamed, Al Shaqfa Salma, Ghalib Hussam H, Pai Shreya, Ghazal Iyad, Atallah Bassam
Department of Pharmacy Services, Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, Al Maryah Island, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Int J Artif Organs. 2025 Aug 3:3913988251359952. doi: 10.1177/03913988251359952.
The combination of VA-ECMO and Impella, known as "ECpella" offers an alternative to the method of left ventricle unloading with intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP). Limited information is available to inform anticoagulation management in cases of concomitant use of Mechanical Circulatory Support (MCS) devices.
This retrospective study included 34 patients receiving hemodynamic support through concomitant MCS for cardiogenic shock for a duration exceeding 24 h. Data collection included patients' demographics, comorbidities, transfusion requirements, anticoagulation protocol, time within therapeutic anticoagulation range, and incidence of bleeding or ischemic events.
Survival to discharge was 32.4% (11 out of 34). Of the 34 patients, 28 patients were treated with a combination of VA-ECMO and IABP (82.4%), while 6 patients (17.6%) were supported with the ECpella. Patients in the VA-ECMO with IABP group had a longer hospital stay (median = 30 days, IQR = 20-43.5) when compared to the ECpella group (median = 21.5 days, IQR = 6-63). Bleeding was documented in a similar proportion in both arms of the investigation (89% in the VA-ECMO with IABP group and 83% in the ECpella group). Thrombosis was more common in the VA-ECMO with IABP group (17.9%) as compared to the ECpella group (16.7%).
Cardiogenic shock requiring concomitant MCS which includes VA-ECMO presents a challenging clinical scenario where the risks of bleeding and thrombosis have to be balanced. Our experience, and review of the literature, highlight the need for further investigation via large retrospective registry analysis as well as randomized controlled trials.
VA-ECMO与Impella联合使用,即“ECpella”,为主动脉内球囊反搏(IABP)左心室卸载方法提供了一种替代方案。关于同时使用机械循环支持(MCS)设备时的抗凝管理,可用信息有限。
这项回顾性研究纳入了34例因心源性休克接受联合MCS血流动力学支持超过24小时的患者。数据收集包括患者的人口统计学资料、合并症、输血需求、抗凝方案、治疗性抗凝范围内的时间以及出血或缺血事件的发生率。
出院生存率为32.4%(34例中的11例)。34例患者中,28例接受了VA-ECMO与IABP联合治疗(82.4%),而6例患者(17.6%)接受了ECpella支持。与ECpella组(中位数=21.5天,四分位间距=6-63)相比,VA-ECMO与IABP组患者的住院时间更长(中位数=30天,四分位间距=20-43.5)。在研究的两组中,记录到的出血比例相似(VA-ECMO与IABP组为89%,ECpella组为83%)。与ECpella组(16.7%)相比,VA-ECMO与IABP组血栓形成更为常见(17.9%)。
需要联合包括VA-ECMO在内的MCS的心源性休克是一种具有挑战性的临床情况,必须平衡出血和血栓形成的风险。我们的经验以及文献回顾强调,需要通过大型回顾性登记分析以及随机对照试验进行进一步研究。