Suppr超能文献

大学是一个专制机构吗?与拉康、弗洛姆和朗西埃的理论探讨。

Is the university an authoritarian institution? A theoretical exploration with Lacan, Fromm, and Rancière.

作者信息

Ronge Bastian

机构信息

Institut für Philosophie, Bergische Universität Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany.

出版信息

Front Res Metr Anal. 2025 Jul 18;10:1579627. doi: 10.3389/frma.2025.1579627. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

This article examines the ambivalent role of the contemporary university in the face of rising authoritarianism. While universities are commonly perceived as bastions of humanism, committed to ideals such as freedom, critical inquiry, and Bildung, this optimistic view may obscure the fact that authoritarian dynamics can persist within the institution itself. Rather than labeling the university as an inherently authoritarian institution, the article argues that it constitutes a social field in which authoritarian tendencies may emerge and take effect-often in subtle and structurally embedded forms. The first part of the article reconstructs Jacques Lacan's psychoanalytic account of the university's authoritative structure and its transformation after 1968, focusing on how authority functions discursively within academic contexts. The second part draws on Erich Fromm's theory of the authoritarian character and combines his perspective with Lacan's framework to propose a heuristic model for identifying and analyzing authoritarian dynamics within present-day academic life. In the third part, the article turns to Jacques Rancière's concept of the ignorant schoolmaster as a means of outlining an anti-authoritarian pedagogy. Rancière's approach is presented as a practical and conceptual tool to carve out spaces of resistance and autonomy within the university. Finally, the article reflects on the limitations of its approach and suggests directions for future research.

摘要

本文探讨了当代大学在面对日益增长的威权主义时所扮演的矛盾角色。虽然大学通常被视为人文主义的堡垒,致力于自由、批判性探究和自我修养等理想,但这种乐观的观点可能掩盖了一个事实,即威权动态可能在大学机构内部持续存在。本文并非将大学贴上本质上是威权机构的标签,而是认为它构成了一个社会领域,在其中威权倾向可能出现并发挥作用——通常以微妙且在结构上根深蒂固的形式。文章的第一部分重构了雅克·拉康对大学权威结构及其1968年后转变的精神分析解释,重点关注权威在学术背景中如何通过话语发挥作用。第二部分借鉴了埃里希·弗洛姆的威权性格理论,并将他的观点与拉康的框架相结合,提出了一个用于识别和分析当今学术生活中威权动态的启发式模型。在第三部分,文章转向雅克·朗西埃的“无知的教师”概念,以此勾勒一种反权威教学法。朗西埃的方法被视为一种实用的概念工具,用于在大学内部开辟抵抗和自主的空间。最后,文章反思了其方法的局限性,并提出了未来研究的方向。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

1
Race matters: the relation between race and general campus climate.种族问题:种族与校园整体氛围的关系。
Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2003 Aug;9(3):263-75. doi: 10.1037/1099-9809.9.3.263.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验