Lail Gary, Cornelio Vanessa C, Go Kimberly, Kaur Kiran, Slowik Piotr
Psychiatry, William Carey University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Hattiesburg, USA.
Psychiatry, St. John's Episcopal Hospital, Far Rockaway, USA.
Cureus. 2025 Jul 31;17(7):e89170. doi: 10.7759/cureus.89170. eCollection 2025 Jul.
Inhalant and volatile substance misuse present significant challenges to society, yet the treatment options have largely been overlooked. Currently, there are no FDA-approved pharmacotherapies for inhalant use disorders. Additionally, there are limited nonpharmacological studies focused on the treatment and management of the disorders. These limitations have made it difficult to establish a standardized approach when treating the disorder and have limited the treatment options available to individuals facing the addiction. This scoping review examines the proposed treatment options for inhalant and volatile substance misuse. It categorizes the proposed treatments and specifically outlines their effectiveness and limiting factors. The review utilized multiple databases such as PubMed, ScienceDirect, and PsycINFO to explore various case reports, public health reports, clinical trials, and community-based programs. There was a focus on studies and reports that specifically explored the pharmacological, psychosocial, supportive, and holistic approaches in treating and managing the disorder. The supportive approaches primarily focused on medical stabilization during the initial hospitalization. They emphasized the management of the airway, breathing, circulation, disability, and exposure (ABCDE) approach, along with patient decontamination. However, these methods offered limited insight into their long-term effectiveness in addressing inhalant and volatile substance misuse. In contrast, pharmacological approaches did explore long-term outcomes in managing inhalant use disorders. Clinical studies involving medications such as aripiprazole showed significant reductions in sustained inhalant use. Similarly, case reports examining the use of baclofen, naltrexone, and lamotrigine reported varying degrees of success in promoting abstinence from inhalants and volatile substances. Nevertheless, these findings were primarily based on small clinical trials and case reports, thus limiting conclusions about their broader effectiveness. Holistic and multifaceted programs, such as the Youth Solvent Addiction Program (YSAP) and the Mt Theo Program, demonstrated the highest success rates among the interventions reviewed. Many of these residential programs incorporated various culturally specific strategies. While effective in their respective contexts, they may pose challenges for broader replication. Psychosocial interventions, including cognitive behavior therapy (CBT)-based brief interventions and family therapy, also demonstrated a reduction of volatile substance use. Yet, they require larger, more comprehensive studies to better evaluate their efficacy. The treatment of inhalant and volatile substance misuse has been approached through various mechanisms. Multiple studies and reports involving the supportive, holistic, pharmacological, and psychosocial approaches have successfully demonstrated varying levels of success when managing inhalant and volatile substance misuse. Yet, no FDA-approved pharmacological treatment or standardized approaches have been developed for managing the disorder. The literature review found that many of the approaches have only demonstrated efficacy on smaller scales and were limited by a culturally specific context. Therefore, further research employing large-scale and multifaceted methodologies is necessary to establish the efficacy and replicability of these interventions.
吸入剂和挥发性物质滥用给社会带来了重大挑战,但治疗选择在很大程度上被忽视了。目前,美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)尚未批准用于治疗吸入剂使用障碍的药物疗法。此外,专注于这些障碍治疗和管理的非药物研究也很有限。这些限制使得在治疗该障碍时难以建立标准化方法,并限制了成瘾者可获得的治疗选择。本范围综述考察了针对吸入剂和挥发性物质滥用的拟议治疗选择。它对拟议的治疗方法进行了分类,并具体概述了其有效性和限制因素。该综述利用了多个数据库,如PubMed、ScienceDirect和PsycINFO,以探索各种病例报告、公共卫生报告、临床试验和社区项目。重点关注专门探讨治疗和管理该障碍的药理学、心理社会、支持性和整体方法的研究和报告。支持性方法主要侧重于初始住院期间的医疗稳定。它们强调气道、呼吸、循环、残疾和暴露(ABCDE)管理方法以及患者去污。然而,这些方法对其在解决吸入剂和挥发性物质滥用方面的长期有效性提供的见解有限。相比之下,药理学方法确实探讨了管理吸入剂使用障碍的长期结果。涉及阿立哌唑等药物的临床研究表明,持续使用吸入剂的情况显著减少。同样,研究巴氯芬、纳曲酮和拉莫三嗪使用情况的病例报告显示,在促进戒除吸入剂和挥发性物质方面取得了不同程度的成功。然而,这些发现主要基于小型临床试验和病例报告,因此限制了关于其更广泛有效性的结论。整体和多方面的项目,如青少年溶剂成瘾项目(YSAP)和Mt Theo项目,在所审查的干预措施中成功率最高。许多这类住院项目纳入了各种针对特定文化的策略。虽然在各自背景下有效,但它们可能在更广泛的推广方面面临挑战。心理社会干预,包括基于认知行为疗法(CBT)的简短干预和家庭治疗,也显示出挥发性物质使用的减少。然而,它们需要更大规模、更全面的研究来更好地评估其疗效。吸入剂和挥发性物质滥用的治疗已通过多种机制进行。涉及支持性、整体性、药理学和心理社会方法的多项研究和报告在管理吸入剂和挥发性物质滥用方面成功展示了不同程度的成效。然而,尚未开发出FDA批准的用于管理该障碍的药物治疗或标准化方法。文献综述发现,许多方法仅在较小规模上证明了疗效,并且受到特定文化背景的限制。因此,需要采用大规模和多方面方法进行进一步研究,以确定这些干预措施的有效性和可复制性。