Unilateral C1-C2 vertical distraction injuries: Can we treat conservatively?

INTRODUCTION

Traumatic atlantoaxial joint (AAJ) vertical distraction injuries lie on a spectrum of injury involving the craniocervical junction. Isolated injuries can be unstable, requiring surgical stabilization, a highly morbid procedure given C1-C2 joint's primary role in cervical spine rotation. Previous authors established normative C1-C2 lateral mass values to evaluate for vertical AAJ distraction injuries. However, these studies focus on bilateral AAJ injury, with no data on unilateral or incomplete AAJ injuries. Clinical decision-making regarding these partial injuries is fraught with uncertainty, especially given the possibility of delayed instability. As a result, this study seeks to characterize injury patterns and clinical courses of patients with incomplete or unilateral AAJ injuries.

METHODS

After receiving Institutional Review Board approval, all magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) radiology reads from January 1, 2006, to August 1, 2021, at our Level I Trauma Center were queried for the following terms: edema, disruption, avulsion, tear, distraction, or subluxation and transverse ligament, AAJ, or C1-C2 joint, resulting in 2779 patients. Inclusion criteria consisted of age greater than 18 years old, history of recent traumatic injury, and radiographic evidence of unilateral AAJ distraction on CT, defined by a unilateral lateral mass index (LMI) >2.6 mm. MRI scans were classified based on the extent of soft-tissue injury. Demographic data and clinical outcomes were obtained by chart review and summarized using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Five patients comprised this study: 3 males and 2 females with an average age of 51 years. Four patients were injured by motor vehicle accident and 1 due to fall from standing height. Three patients had concomitant orthopedic extremity fractures requiring operative fixation. The average LMI of the involved joint was 4.2 mm versus 2.0 in the contralateral joint. On MRI, 3 patients exhibited bilateral AAJ effusions. No patients demonstrated complete injury of associated ligaments. All patients were treated conservatively with a rigid cervical collar. No patients demonstrated late instability at an average radiographic follow-up of 876 days.

CONCLUSION

Unilateral or incomplete AAJ vertical distraction injuries lie on a spectrum of injury involving the craniocervical junction and more specifically the C1-C2 articulation. MRI is essential to evaluate the ligamentous stabilizers of the craniocervical junction prior to any treatment decisions, but in the absence of an unstable ligamentous injury, incomplete or unilateral vertical distraction injuries can be safely managed conservatively. This study is one of few to examine unilateral ligamentous injury between the atlas and axis of the spine. This study shows that in the absence of injury instability, these injuries can successfully be treated nonoperatively with successful patient outcomes.