• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

功能性/分离性癫痫发作期间脑网络动力学的变化:一项关于脑电图微状态的探索性初步研究。

Changes in brain network dynamics during functional/dissociative seizures: An exploratory pilot study on EEG microstates.

作者信息

Kučikienė Domantė, Jungilligens Johannes, Wolking Stefan, Weber Yvonne, Wellmer Jörg, Popkirov Stoyan

机构信息

Department of Epileptology and Neurology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.

Department of Neurology, University Hospital Knappschaft Kliniken Bochum, Bochum, Germany.

出版信息

Epilepsy Behav Rep. 2025 Jul 23;31:100809. doi: 10.1016/j.ebr.2025.100809. eCollection 2025 Sep.

DOI:10.1016/j.ebr.2025.100809
PMID:40757263
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12318286/
Abstract

The pathophysiology of functional/dissociative seizures (FDS), also known as psychogenic nonepileptic seizures, remains incompletely understood. Current theories suggest that ictal changes in self-awareness and behavioural control are likely related to arousal-mediated disruptions of brain network dynamics, but direct electrophysiological evidence is scarce. In a proof-of-concept, the second of its kind pilot study, we explored ictal changes in EEG microstates - quasi-stable patterns of electrical activity of 50-70 ms duration that represent fundamental building blocks of large-scale brain network dynamics. Across a sample of 13 FDS patients, four microstates yielded a high mean global explained variance of 76.2 % and qualitatively resembled the well-established "canonical" microstate map topographies A-D. Repeated measure analysis of variance did not reveal any significant differences in contribution, occurrence or global field power of microstates between baseline and ictal recordings. Microstate duration, however, was significantly different between baseline and seizure recordings with shorter durations of microstates in FDS (p = 0.007). This was most pronounced for microstate D (Cohen's  = 0.75) with the change being significant in an exploratory post hoc paired -test (p = 0.044). Since microstate D is thought to reflect frontoparietal network activity, the findings of this pilot study can be interpreted as supportive of current theories of arousal-mediated disruptions of network activity that reduce cognitive and behavioural control during FDS.

摘要

功能性/分离性癫痫发作(FDS),也称为精神性非癫痫性发作,其病理生理学仍未完全明晰。当前理论表明,自我意识和行为控制的发作期变化可能与觉醒介导的脑网络动力学破坏有关,但直接的电生理证据却很匮乏。在一项同类概念验证性初步研究中,我们探究了脑电图微状态的发作期变化——持续时间为50 - 70毫秒的电活动准稳定模式,它代表了大规模脑网络动力学的基本组成部分。在13名FDS患者的样本中,四种微状态产生了76.2%的高平均全局解释方差,并且在质量上类似于已确立的“A - D”“典型”微状态图谱地形。重复测量方差分析未发现基线和发作期记录之间微状态在贡献、出现或全局场功率方面存在任何显著差异。然而,基线和癫痫发作记录之间的微状态持续时间存在显著差异,FDS中微状态持续时间较短(p = 0.007)。这在微状态D中最为明显(科恩效应量 = 0.75),在探索性事后配对检验中变化显著(p = 0.044)。由于微状态D被认为反映额顶叶网络活动,这项初步研究的结果可以解释为支持当前关于觉醒介导的网络活动破坏的理论,这种破坏会在FDS期间降低认知和行为控制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e02/12318286/295765873e65/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e02/12318286/8cfc75de36bf/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e02/12318286/295765873e65/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e02/12318286/8cfc75de36bf/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e02/12318286/295765873e65/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Changes in brain network dynamics during functional/dissociative seizures: An exploratory pilot study on EEG microstates.功能性/分离性癫痫发作期间脑网络动力学的变化:一项关于脑电图微状态的探索性初步研究。
Epilepsy Behav Rep. 2025 Jul 23;31:100809. doi: 10.1016/j.ebr.2025.100809. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Idiopathic (Genetic) Generalized Epilepsy特发性(遗传性)全身性癫痫
3
EEG microstates: Functional significance and short-term test-retest reliability.脑电图微状态:功能意义与短期重测信度。
Neuroimage Rep. 2022 Mar 12;2(2):100089. doi: 10.1016/j.ynirp.2022.100089. eCollection 2022 Jun.
4
Antiepileptic drug monotherapy for epilepsy: a network meta-analysis of individual participant data.抗癫痫药物单药治疗癫痫:一项个体参与者数据的网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 1;4(4):CD011412. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011412.pub4.
5
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
6
Short-Term Memory Impairment短期记忆障碍
7
Levetiracetam add-on for drug-resistant focal epilepsy: an updated Cochrane Review.左乙拉西坦添加治疗耐药性局灶性癫痫:Cochrane系统评价的更新版
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12;2012(9):CD001901. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001901.pub2.
8
Apathy in Parkinson's Disease: EEG Microstate Characteristics.帕金森病中的淡漠:脑电图微状态特征
Brain Topogr. 2025 Jun 5;38(4):49. doi: 10.1007/s10548-025-01124-z.
9
The Functional Aspects of Resting EEG Microstates: A Systematic Review.静息态 EEG 微状态的功能方面:系统评价。
Brain Topogr. 2024 Mar;37(2):181-217. doi: 10.1007/s10548-023-00958-9. Epub 2023 May 10.
10
Exploring the alterations in microstate dynamics during the migraine cycle and detecting pre-ictal phases.探索偏头痛发作周期中微状态动力学的变化并检测发作前期。
Headache. 2025 Jul 31. doi: 10.1111/head.15031.

本文引用的文献

1
EEG microstates during resting-state and dissociative events in patients with psychogenic non-epileptic seizures.心理性非癫痫发作患者静息状态和解离事件期间的脑电图微状态
Clin Neurophysiol. 2025 May;173:124-131. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2025.03.002. Epub 2025 Mar 8.
2
EEG microstate as a biomarker of personalized transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment on anhedonia in depression.脑电图微状态作为抑郁症快感缺失个性化经颅磁刺激治疗的生物标志物。
Behav Brain Res. 2025 Apr 12;483:115463. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2025.115463. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
3
Locus coeruleus co-activation patterns at rest show higher state persistence in patients with dissociative seizures: A Pilot Study.
解离性癫痫患者静息时蓝斑核共激活模式显示出更高的状态持续性:一项初步研究。
Epilepsia Open. 2024 Dec;9(6):2331-2341. doi: 10.1002/epi4.13050. Epub 2024 Oct 7.
4
Common and differential EEG microstate of major depressive disorder patients with and without response to rTMS treatment.伴或不伴 rTMS 治疗反应的重性抑郁障碍患者的 EEG 微状态的共同和差异。
J Affect Disord. 2024 Dec 15;367:777-787. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.09.040. Epub 2024 Sep 10.
5
The imprint of dissociative seizures on the brain.分离性癫痫发作在大脑上的印记。
Neuroimage Clin. 2024;43:103664. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2024.103664. Epub 2024 Aug 29.
6
EEG microstates are associated with the improvement of obsessive-compulsive symptoms after transcranial direct current stimulation.脑电微状态与经颅直流电刺激后强迫症症状的改善有关。
J Psychiatr Res. 2024 Aug;176:360-367. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.06.034. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
7
Heartbeat evoked potentials and autonomic arousal during dissociative seizures: insights from electrophysiology and neuroimaging.分离性癫痫发作期间的心跳诱发电位与自主神经唤醒:来自电生理学和神经影像学的见解
BMJ Neurol Open. 2024 Jun 5;6(1):e000665. doi: 10.1136/bmjno-2024-000665. eCollection 2024.
8
A meta-analytic evaluation of the effectiveness and durability of psychotherapy for adults presenting with functional dissociative seizures.成人功能性分离性癫痫患者的心理治疗效果和持久性的荟萃分析评估。
Seizure. 2024 Jul;119:98-109. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2024.05.016. Epub 2024 May 25.
9
EEG microstates show different features in focal epilepsy and psychogenic nonepileptic seizures.脑电图微状态在局灶性癫痫和精神性非癫痫发作中表现出不同特征。
Epilepsia. 2024 Apr;65(4):974-983. doi: 10.1111/epi.17897. Epub 2024 Jan 30.
10
The Functional Aspects of Resting EEG Microstates: A Systematic Review.静息态 EEG 微状态的功能方面:系统评价。
Brain Topogr. 2024 Mar;37(2):181-217. doi: 10.1007/s10548-023-00958-9. Epub 2023 May 10.