Ahmed Ashraf, Elkatatny Salaheldin, Onaizi Sagheer
College of Petroleum Engineering and Geosciences, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, 31261 Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.
Department of Chemical Engineering, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, 31261 Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.
ACS Omega. 2025 Jul 15;10(29):31492-31500. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.5c01472. eCollection 2025 Jul 29.
Hydrogen sulfide (HS) poses significant hazards in oil and gas drilling, including corrosion of drilling equipment, environmental risks, and threats to personnel safety. Therefore, effective and prompt removal of this gas is crucial. While various scavengers are employed in the drilling operation, each has limitations related to reactivity, cost, conditions, and health and environmental concerns. Ongoing research endeavors, we seek to develop a more feasible HS scavenger compatible with muds. This research aimed to examine the potential of using diethylamine (DEA) and triethylamine (TEA) as scavengers for HS in aqueous drilling fluids. The HS scavenging performance was addressed by identifying the breakthrough and saturation times and capacities for each material at room temperature. The study also addressed the influences of these materials on mud rheology, alkalinity, filtration performance, and corrosion affinity, comparing them with a commercialized triazine-based scavenger. These evaluations were carried out at 120 °F. This study demonstrates that DEA and TEA are highly effective scavengers for aqueous drilling fluids. Both amines provide significant scavenging capacity and surpass commercial scavengers. They delayed the release and breakthrough of HS gas and improved the capacity of the mud to remove the gas by 247 and 215%, respectively, compared to 179% with the commercial scavenger. The optimal conditions for this scavenging performance typically require a basic pH range and temperatures below the normal boiling points of DEA and TEA, as they become unstable beyond these limits. This makes them effective for use in shallow formations, where HS is present. The examined materials did not compromise the mud's rheology and filtering performance, meeting the required practical criteria. Furthermore, they exhibited a noncorrosive nature, with corrosion rates nearing zero. When amine-based chemicals were added, the drilling fluid's pH readings remained over the 10-pH cutoff point for sour situations. This study provides insights into enhancing HS scavenging mechanisms in aqueous muds, demonstrating competent mud performance, and encouraging safe and effective drilling operationsparticularly with the presence of HS at shallow formations.
硫化氢(HS)在石油和天然气钻探中构成重大危害,包括对钻井设备的腐蚀、环境风险以及对人员安全的威胁。因此,有效且迅速地去除这种气体至关重要。虽然在钻井作业中使用了各种清除剂,但每种清除剂在反应性、成本、条件以及健康和环境问题方面都存在局限性。在持续的研究工作中,我们致力于开发一种与泥浆兼容的更可行的HS清除剂。本研究旨在考察使用二乙胺(DEA)和三乙胺(TEA)作为水基钻井液中HS清除剂的潜力。通过确定每种材料在室温下的穿透时间、饱和时间和容量来研究HS清除性能。该研究还探讨了这些材料对泥浆流变学、碱度、过滤性能和腐蚀亲和性的影响,并与一种商业化的三嗪基清除剂进行了比较。这些评估是在120°F下进行的。本研究表明,DEA和TEA是水基钻井液的高效清除剂。两种胺都具有显著的清除能力,超过了商业清除剂。与商业清除剂使泥浆去除气体的能力提高179%相比,它们分别将HS气体的释放和穿透延迟,并使泥浆去除气体的能力提高了247%和215%。这种清除性能的最佳条件通常需要碱性pH范围以及低于DEA和TEA正常沸点的温度,因为超过这些限度它们会变得不稳定。这使得它们在存在HS的浅层地层中使用时很有效。所研究的材料没有损害泥浆的流变学和过滤性能,符合所需的实际标准。此外,它们表现出非腐蚀性,腐蚀速率接近零。当添加胺基化学品时,钻井液的pH读数在酸性情况下仍保持在10的pH临界值以上。本研究为增强水基泥浆中HS清除机制提供了见解,展示了良好的泥浆性能,并促进了安全有效的钻井作业,特别是在浅层地层存在HS的情况下。