Tounsi Haifa, Aouni Jaafer, Kharrat Ghada, Skouri Wafa, Ferchichi Sana, Garbouj Wafa, Bachrouch Sabrine, Lajmi Manel, Dghaies Selma, Chaabene Abir, Kaabar Yassine, Bouzaidi Khaled, Amri Raja, Alaya Zeineb
Department of Internal Medicine, Mohamed Tahar Maamouri University Hospital, Nabeul 8000, Tunisia.
Department of Ophthalmology, Mohamed Tahar Maamouri University Hospital, Nabeul 8000, Tunisia.
Vasc Dis (Paris). 2025 Apr;50(2):75-79. doi: 10.1016/j.vasdi.2025.02.003. Epub 2025 Apr 15.
To describe diagnostic and therapeutic difficulties encountered in the management of giant cell arteritis (GCA).
We retrospectively included patients with GCA based on the 1990 ACR criteria, who were followed in the Internal Medicine Department of Mohamed Tahar Maamouri Hospital in Nabeul, Tunisia, over a 5-year period, from 1st January 2014 to 1st January 2019.
Twenty-one patients (16 women and 5 men) were included. The average age at diagnosis was 70 years. Predominant revealing symptoms were headache reported in 13 cases and ocular manifestations in 11 cases. Jaw claudication, scalp hyperesthesia and polymyalgia rheumatica were noted in 8 cases each. Ocular manifestations included acute anterior ischemic optic neuropathy in 8 cases, retrobulbar optic neuritis in 3 cases and central retinal artery occlusion in a single case. Inflammatory syndrome was consistently noted. Doppler ultrasound showed temporal artery 'halo sign' in one case and stenosis of the external carotid in another. In computed tomography (CT) scan, we found a thoracic aortitis in one case and an aortic ectasia in another. Temporal artery biopsy contributed to the diagnosis in 9 cases. Corticosteroid therapy was prescribed for all patients, preceded by three methylprednisolone pulses in 5 cases. Osteoporosis, steroid-induced diabetes and infections were the main adverse effects noted respectively in 14, 8 and 4 cases. Improvement was noted in 19 cases. Blindness was noted in two cases due to delayed consultation. Methotrexate was introduced in four patients for disease relapse.
Although rare in Tunisia, GCA remains a medical emergency because of the risk of sudden irreversible sight loss and stroke.
描述巨细胞动脉炎(GCA)管理中遇到的诊断和治疗困难。
我们回顾性纳入了根据1990年美国风湿病学会(ACR)标准诊断为GCA的患者,这些患者于2014年1月1日至2019年1月1日期间在突尼斯纳布尔的穆罕默德·塔哈尔·马穆里医院内科接受了为期5年的随访。
共纳入21例患者(16例女性和5例男性)。诊断时的平均年龄为70岁。主要的首发症状为13例头痛和11例眼部表现。8例患者出现颌部间歇性运动障碍、头皮感觉过敏和风湿性多肌痛。眼部表现包括8例急性前部缺血性视神经病变、3例球后视神经炎和1例视网膜中央动脉阻塞。始终存在炎症综合征。多普勒超声检查发现1例颞动脉“晕征”,另1例颈外动脉狭窄。计算机断层扫描(CT)显示1例胸主动脉炎和另1例主动脉扩张。颞动脉活检确诊9例。所有患者均接受了皮质类固醇治疗,其中5例在治疗前接受了三次甲泼尼龙冲击治疗。分别在14例、8例和4例患者中观察到骨质疏松、类固醇诱导的糖尿病和感染等主要不良反应。19例患者病情有所改善。2例患者因就诊延迟而失明。4例疾病复发患者加用了甲氨蝶呤。
尽管在突尼斯GCA较为罕见,但由于存在突然不可逆视力丧失和中风的风险,它仍然是一种医疗急症。