Kang Xing-Yu, Gao Cheng-Fei, Guo Leng-Qiu, Kong Qing, Zhou Tao, Zhang Hong, Wu Yi-Ling, Guo Zhuang-Li
Department of Rehabilitation, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
College of Pharmacy, Suzhou Vocational Health College, Suzhou, China.
Acupunct Med. 2025 Aug;43(4):187-197. doi: 10.1177/09645284251365647. Epub 2025 Aug 4.
Dysphagia is a common complication after stroke and can negatively affect patients' quality of life. Despite electroacupuncture (EA) being widely used to treat dysphagia, its effectiveness and underlying mechanism of action have not been thoroughly examined. The aim of this study was to gather preliminary data on the efficacy of EA when used as an adjunct to a standardized but individually adjusted rehabilitation program for patients with post-stroke oropharyngeal dysphagia (PSOD) and to compare EA with adjunctive neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES).
Forty-five patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned to EA, NMES or control groups. All groups received traditional rehabilitation training for dysphagia. The EA and NMES group additionally received EA at bilateral and NMES of the suprahyoid muscle group, respectively. Before and 3 weeks after treatment, the swallowing function of the patients was assessed by surface electromyography (sEMG), videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS), standardized swallowing assessment (SSA) and water swallow test (primary outcomes). Post hoc secondary outcome measures included the functional oral intake scale (FOIS), penetration-aspiration scale (PAS) and deglutition duration.
All outcome measures improved within each group. When compared to the control group, greater improvements were seen in the EA group for SSA, FOIS, modified barium swallow impairment profile (MBSImp) and PAS scores, as well as several different sEMG parameters (average EMG (AEMG), peak amplitude and deglutition duration for both saliva and water) in PSOD patients. Only deglutition duration for water and saliva was significantly improved in NMES versus control groups. EA was superior to NMES only with respect to the AEMG for water and saliva.
This study provides preliminary evidence demonstrating that PSOD patients may benefit from EA at bilateral . Relative to a control group receiving traditional rehabilitation alone, the addition of EA was associated with improvements in a range of different outcome measures in PSOD patients, with medium to large effect sizes. ChiCTR2200058198 (Chinese Clinical Trial Registry).
吞咽困难是中风后的常见并发症,会对患者的生活质量产生负面影响。尽管电针(EA)被广泛用于治疗吞咽困难,但其有效性及潜在作用机制尚未得到充分研究。本研究的目的是收集电针作为标准化但个体化调整的康复计划辅助手段用于中风后口咽吞咽困难(PSOD)患者时的疗效初步数据,并将电针与辅助神经肌肉电刺激(NMES)进行比较。
45名符合纳入标准的患者被随机分配到电针组、神经肌肉电刺激组或对照组。所有组均接受吞咽困难的传统康复训练。电针组和神经肌肉电刺激组分别额外接受双侧颏舌骨肌组的电针治疗和神经肌肉电刺激。治疗前及治疗3周后,通过表面肌电图(sEMG)、视频荧光吞咽造影检查(VFSS)、标准化吞咽评估(SSA)和水吞咽试验(主要结局指标)对患者的吞咽功能进行评估。事后次要结局指标包括功能性经口进食量表(FOIS)、渗透-误吸量表(PAS)和吞咽持续时间。
每组内所有结局指标均有改善。与对照组相比,电针组在PSOD患者的SSA、FOIS、改良钡剂吞咽障碍轮廓(MBSImp)和PAS评分以及几个不同的sEMG参数(平均肌电图(AEMG)、峰值幅度以及唾液和水的吞咽持续时间)方面有更大改善。与对照组相比,神经肌肉电刺激组仅水和唾液的吞咽持续时间有显著改善。电针仅在水和唾液的AEMG方面优于神经肌肉电刺激。
本研究提供了初步证据表明,PSOD患者可能从双侧电针治疗中获益。相对于仅接受传统康复的对照组,添加电针与PSOD患者一系列不同结局指标的改善相关,效应大小为中到大型。ChiCTR2200058198(中国临床试验注册)