Patel Virjen, Thomson Benedict, Ghazal-Aswad Bisher, Makris Gregory C, Diamantopoulos Athanasios
Department of Interventional Radiology, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Trust, St Thomas' Hospital, 1st Floor Lambeth Wing, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, Kings College London., London, UK.
Radiol Case Rep. 2025 Jul 28;20(10):5205-5209. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2025.06.107. eCollection 2025 Oct.
A 44-year-old gentleman was referred to IR for varicocele embolization (VE) by the fertility clinic following investigation for oligospermia. A testicular ultrasound identified a left grade II varicocele. The patient had known anaphylaxis to water-soluble iodinated contrast. We planned to perform VE with a combination of alternative contrast agents. The procedure was performed under general anesthetic to mitigate the pain related to carbon dioxide angiography. Following standard venous access techniques of the right internal jugular vein, carbon dioxide was used as the main contrast agent with digital subtraction venogram, to confirm catheter selection of left testicular vein. This demonstrated a large varicocele. After coil deployment the gadolinium-based contrast agent Dotarem, was injected and venography used to confirm occlusion of the left testicular vein. Then a combination of 4 mL of 3% Fibro vein and 2 mL of Lipiodol was injected to achieve embolization of the testicular vein collaterals. The patient made an uneventful recovery. This is the first reported case of both carbon dioxide angiography and gadolinium being used in VE. It appears safe and effective. The use of alternative contrast media appears safe and effective in VE in those patients with contraindications to ionic agents. Due to their different properties, a combination of alternative contrast agents can be more effective than a single agent. We provide a pictorial review of the case and an educational summary on the indications and practical uses of various alternative contrast agents in IR procedures in a patient with a water-soluble iodinated contrast allergy.
一名44岁男性因少精子症接受检查后,被生育诊所转诊至介入放射科进行精索静脉曲张栓塞术(VE)。睾丸超声检查发现左侧II级精索静脉曲张。该患者已知对水溶性碘化造影剂过敏。我们计划联合使用替代造影剂进行VE。手术在全身麻醉下进行,以减轻与二氧化碳血管造影相关的疼痛。采用标准的右颈内静脉静脉穿刺技术,以二氧化碳作为主要造影剂进行数字减影静脉造影,以确认左睾丸静脉的导管选择。结果显示有一个大的精索静脉曲张。在植入弹簧圈后,注射钆基造影剂多他胺葡胺,并通过静脉造影确认左睾丸静脉闭塞。然后注射4 mL 3%的纤维蛋白胶和2 mL碘油的混合液,以实现睾丸静脉侧支的栓塞。患者术后恢复顺利。这是首例在VE中同时使用二氧化碳血管造影和钆剂的报道病例。该方法似乎安全有效。在对离子型造影剂有禁忌证的患者中,使用替代造影剂进行VE似乎安全有效。由于它们的性质不同,联合使用替代造影剂可能比单一造影剂更有效。我们提供了该病例的图片回顾以及关于各种替代造影剂在一名对水溶性碘化造影剂过敏患者的介入放射学程序中的适应证和实际应用的教学总结。