• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过翻转课堂教学法进行赋能型领导力培训对长期护理机构中护理人员和居民幸福感的影响。

Impact of Empowering Leadership Training Through Flipped Learning Approach on the Well-Being of Nursing Staff and Residents in Long-Term Care Settings.

作者信息

Yeh Tzu-Pei, Lin Yen-Kuang, Lu Hsin-Yi, Bloomfield Jacqueline, Chen I-Hui

机构信息

School of Nursing, China Medical University, 100, Jingmao Rd., Sec. 1, Beitun District, Taichung 406040, Taiwan.

Department of Nursing, China Medical University Hospital, 2, Yude Rd., North District, Taichung 404327, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Nurs Manag. 2025 Jul 28;2025:5815383. doi: 10.1155/jonm/5815383. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1155/jonm/5815383
PMID:40761341
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12321434/
Abstract

The benefits of empowering leadership have been documented, but few studies have examined its impacts on nursing staff job well-being and resident outcomes in long-term care (LTC) settings. In this study, we evaluated the effects of an empowering leadership training program, delivered via a flipped learning approach for LTC leaders, on nursing staff and resident well-being. A quasiexperimental pre-post design with a control group was used. Participants were recruited from six residential facilities in central Taiwan, and included 80 staff (40 per group), 186 residents (intervention: 100; control: 86), and 21 leaders (10 in the intervention group and 11 in the control group). A 12-module intervention for LTC leaders comprised e-learning, face-to-face classes, and post-class assignments focused on empowering leadership. Each module lasted 2 h per week. The control group received an educational brochure covering the same topics. Postintervention data were collected 3 months after the intervention. Staff measures included the Leader Empowerment Behavior Scale, Occupational Burnout Inventory Scale, Spreitzer's Empowerment Scale, Minnesota Job Satisfaction Questionnaire, and a single-item about job stress. Resident measures were the SF-36 health survey, WHO Quality of Life Questionnaire, and Customer Satisfaction Scale. Linear mixed models were employed to assess intervention effects. This study complied with the TREND checklist. Compared to controls, the intervention group demonstrated significant improvements over time in staff perceptions of empowering leader behaviors ( < 0.001), psychological empowerment ( < 0.001), job satisfaction ( < 0.001), and reduced burnout ( < 0.001). For residents, significant improvements in psychological health ( < 0.05), quality of life ( < 0.05), and care quality ( < 0.001) were detected in the intervention group. The empowering leadership educational intervention for leaders using a flipped learning approach enhanced nursing staff job well-being and resident health outcomes in LTC settings. This intervention can provide a sustainable model for cultivating empowering leadership to optimize LTC workforce stability and resident care. Further research exploring mechanisms and long-term sustainability is warranted.

摘要

赋能型领导的益处已有文献记载,但很少有研究考察其对长期护理(LTC)机构中护理人员工作幸福感和居民结局的影响。在本研究中,我们评估了通过翻转学习方法为LTC领导者提供的赋能型领导培训项目对护理人员和居民幸福感的影响。采用了带有对照组的准实验前后设计。参与者从台湾中部的六个居住设施中招募,包括80名工作人员(每组40名)、186名居民(干预组:100名;对照组:86名)和21名领导者(干预组10名,对照组11名)。针对LTC领导者的一个12模块干预包括电子学习、面对面课程以及侧重于赋能型领导的课后作业。每个模块每周持续2小时。对照组收到一份涵盖相同主题的教育手册。干预后3个月收集数据。工作人员的测量指标包括领导者赋能行为量表、职业倦怠量表、斯普雷itzer赋能量表、明尼苏达工作满意度问卷以及一项关于工作压力的单项指标。居民的测量指标为SF - 36健康调查、世界卫生组织生活质量问卷和客户满意度量表。采用线性混合模型评估干预效果。本研究符合TREND清单。与对照组相比,干预组随着时间推移在工作人员对赋能型领导行为的认知(<0.001)、心理赋能(<0.001)、工作满意度(<0.001)以及倦怠减轻(<0.001)方面有显著改善。对于居民,干预组在心理健康(<0.05)、生活质量(<0.05)和护理质量(<0.001)方面有显著改善。采用翻转学习方法对领导者进行的赋能型领导教育干预提高了LTC机构中护理人员的工作幸福感和居民的健康结局。这种干预可为培养赋能型领导以优化LTC劳动力稳定性和居民护理提供一个可持续的模式。有必要进一步研究探索其机制和长期可持续性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fcf/12321434/0c94c46dfc5c/JONM2025-5815383.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fcf/12321434/0c94c46dfc5c/JONM2025-5815383.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fcf/12321434/0c94c46dfc5c/JONM2025-5815383.001.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of Empowering Leadership Training Through Flipped Learning Approach on the Well-Being of Nursing Staff and Residents in Long-Term Care Settings.通过翻转课堂教学法进行赋能型领导力培训对长期护理机构中护理人员和居民幸福感的影响。
J Nurs Manag. 2025 Jul 28;2025:5815383. doi: 10.1155/jonm/5815383. eCollection 2025.
2
A model of occupational stress to assess impact of COVID-19 on critical care and redeployed nurses: a mixed-methods study.一种评估 COVID-19 对重症护理和重新调配护士影响的职业压力模型:一项混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Dec 18:1-32. doi: 10.3310/PWRT8714.
3
Effectiveness of team nursing compared with total patient care on staff wellbeing when organizing nursing work in acute care wards: a systematic review.在急性护理病房组织护理工作时,团队护理与全病人护理相比对员工幸福感的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Nov;13(11):128-68. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2428.
4
Does Structural Empowerment of Nurse Leaders Moderate the Relationship Between Destructive Leadership and Nursing Outcomes?-A Cross-Sectional Study.护士领导者的结构赋权是否会调节破坏性领导与护理结果之间的关系?——一项横断面研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2025 Aug;81(8):4768-4780. doi: 10.1111/jan.16684. Epub 2024 Dec 18.
5
Effects of person-centered care on residents and staff in aged-care facilities: a systematic review.以人本主义为中心的护理对养老院居民和工作人员的影响:系统评价。
Clin Interv Aging. 2013;8:1-10. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S38589. Epub 2013 Jan 3.
6
Interventions for preventing and reducing the use of physical restraints for older people in all long-term care settings.预防和减少所有长期护理环境中老年人使用身体约束的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 28;7(7):CD007546. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007546.pub3.
7
Experiences of registered nurses as managers and leaders in residential aged care facilities: a systematic review.注册护士在养老院的管理和领导经验:系统评价。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2011 Dec;9(4):388-402. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2011.00239.x.
8
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
9
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
10
Do Women and Minority Orthopaedic Residents Report Experiencing Worse Well-being and More Mistreatment Than Their Peers?女性和少数族裔骨科住院医师报告的幸福感是否比同龄人更差,遭受的不当对待是否更多?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Aug 1;482(8):1325-1337. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003015. Epub 2024 Feb 27.

本文引用的文献

1
The Importance of Autonomy and Performance Goals in Perceived Workload Among Behavioral Health Providers.行为健康服务提供者中自主性和绩效目标在感知工作量方面的重要性。
Psychiatr Serv. 2024 Aug 1;75(8):748-755. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.20230406. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
2
Person-centered care as a tool to reduce behavioral and psychological symptoms in older adults with dementia living in residential care facilities.以患者为中心的护理作为减少居住在养老院的老年痴呆症患者行为和心理症状的工具。
Geriatr Nurs. 2024 May-Jun;57:51-57. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2024.03.003. Epub 2024 Mar 23.
3
Relationship between transformational leadership, adverse patient events, and nurse-assessed quality of care in emergency units: The mediating role of work satisfaction.
变革型领导与不良患者事件和急诊病房护士评估的护理质量之间的关系:工作满意度的中介作用。
Australas Emerg Care. 2024 Mar;27(1):49-56. doi: 10.1016/j.auec.2023.08.001. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
4
Retention and Resilience of Nursing Home Staff During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Voices from the Frontline.新冠疫情期间养老院工作人员的留用与适应力:来自一线的声音
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2023 Oct;24(10):1606-1608. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2023.07.011. Epub 2023 Aug 12.
5
Why do workers leave geriatric care, and do they come back? A timing of events study.为什么工人离开老年护理,他们会回来吗?一项事件时间研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2023 Sep;145:104556. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104556. Epub 2023 Jun 24.
6
Can Better Leadership Reduce Nursing Home Staff Turnover?更好的领导力能否降低养老院员工离职率?
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2024 Mar;25(3):403-407.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2023.05.021. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
7
Nursing home staff perceptions of well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study.养老机构工作人员在 COVID-19 大流行期间的幸福感认知:一项定性研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2023 Oct;79(10):3866-3875. doi: 10.1111/jan.15730. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
8
More of a Good Thing: A Framework to Grow and Strengthen the PALTC Careforce.多多益善:构建 PALTC 关怀团队的壮大与强化框架。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2023 Nov;24(11):1779-1782. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2023.05.004. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
9
Building a Program Theory of Implementation Using Process Evaluation of a Complex Quality Improvement Trial in Nursing Homes.利用养老院复杂质量改进试验的过程评估构建实施项目理论
Gerontologist. 2024 Feb 1;64(2). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnad064.
10
Care Delivery, Quality Measurement, and Quality Improvement in Nursing Homes: Issues and Recommendations from the National Academies' Report on the Quality of Care in Nursing Homes.养老院的护理服务、质量衡量与质量改进:美国国家科学院关于养老院护理质量报告中的问题与建议
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Feb;71(2):329-334. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18275.