Suppr超能文献

在急性护理病房组织护理工作时,团队护理与全病人护理相比对员工幸福感的有效性:一项系统评价。

Effectiveness of team nursing compared with total patient care on staff wellbeing when organizing nursing work in acute care wards: a systematic review.

作者信息

King Allana, Long Lesley, Lisy Karolina

机构信息

1 Ward Q5, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia2 The Joanna Briggs Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Adelaide, Australia.

出版信息

JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Nov;13(11):128-68. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2428.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The organization of the work of nurses, according to recognized models of care, can have a significant impact on the wellbeing and performance of nurses and nursing teams. This review focuses on two models of nursing care delivery, namely, team and total patient care, and their effect on nurses' wellbeing.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the effectiveness of team nursing compared to total patient care on staff wellbeing when organizing nursing work in acute care wards.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

Participants were nurses working on wards in acute care hospitals.The intervention was the use of a team nursing model when organizing nursing work. The comparator was the use of a total patient care model.This review considered quantitative study designs for inclusion in the review.The outcome of interest was staff wellbeing which was measured by staff outcomes in relation to job satisfaction, turnover, absenteeism, stress levels and burnout.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The search strategy aimed to find both published and unpublished studies from 1995 to April 21, 2014.

METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY

Quantitative papers selected for retrieval were assessed by two independent reviewers for methodological validity prior to inclusion in the review using standardized critical appraisal instruments from the Joanna Briggs Institute.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data was extracted from papers included in the review using the standardized data extraction tool from the Joanna Briggs Institute. The data extracted included specific details about the interventions, populations, study methods and outcomes of significance to the review question and its specific objectives.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Due to the heterogeneity of the included quantitative studies, meta-analysis was not possible. Results have been presented in a narrative form.

RESULTS

The database search returned 10,067 records. Forty-three full text titles were assessed, and of these 40 were excluded, resulting in three studies being included in the review. Two of the studies were quasi experimental designs and the other was considered an uncontrolled before and after experimental study. There were no statistically significant differences observed in any study in the overall job satisfaction of nurses using a team nursing model compared with a total patient care model. Some differences in job satisfaction were however observed within different subgroups of nurses. There were no statistically significant differences in either stress or job tension. Within the selected studies, the specific outcomes of absenteeism and burnout were not addressed.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to the limited number of quantitative studies identified for inclusion in this systematic review it is not possible to determine whether organizing nursing work in a team nursing or total patient care model is more effective in terms of staff wellbeing in acute care settings. Neither a team nursing or total patient care model had a significant influence on nurses' overall job satisfaction, stress levels or staff turnover. This review could not ascertain if the type of model of care affects absenteeism or burnout as these were not addressed in any of the identified studies.Caution should be taken when evaluating which model of care is appropriate and the decision needs to incorporate staff experience levels and staff skill mix. There needs to be clear definition of nursing roles.This review demonstrates the need for further quantitative studies of these models of care that are well designed with sufficient sample sizes to allow for attrition of participants, and that explore the impact each model has on nurse's wellbeing, in particular, studies that address burnout and absenteeism. There is a need for consistent terminology to allow for future comparison and research to occur at an international level. Future studies on models of care should include economic analysis to fully inform policy and practice.

摘要

背景

根据公认的护理模式来组织护士工作,可能会对护士及护理团队的健康和绩效产生重大影响。本综述聚焦于两种护理服务模式,即团队护理和全病人护理,以及它们对护士健康的影响。

目的

在急症护理病房组织护理工作时,研究团队护理与全病人护理相比对员工健康的有效性。

纳入标准

参与者为急症护理医院病房的护士。干预措施是在组织护理工作时采用团队护理模式。对照措施是采用全病人护理模式。本综述纳入定量研究设计。感兴趣的结果是员工健康,通过与工作满意度、人员流动率、缺勤率、压力水平和职业倦怠相关的员工结果来衡量。

检索策略

检索策略旨在查找1995年至2014年4月21日期间已发表和未发表的研究。

方法学质量

入选检索的定量论文在纳入综述之前,由两名独立评审员使用乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的标准化批判性评价工具评估其方法学有效性。

数据提取

使用乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的标准化数据提取工具从纳入综述的论文中提取数据。提取的数据包括与干预措施、研究对象、研究方法以及对综述问题及其特定目标具有重要意义的结果相关的具体细节。

数据综合

由于纳入的定量研究存在异质性,无法进行荟萃分析。结果以叙述形式呈现。

结果

数据库检索返回10,067条记录。评估了43篇全文标题,其中40篇被排除,最终3项研究纳入综述。两项研究为准实验设计,另一项被视为非对照前后实验研究。在任何研究中,使用团队护理模式的护士与使用全病人护理模式的护士在总体工作满意度上均未观察到统计学上的显著差异。然而,在不同护士亚组中观察到了工作满意度的一些差异。压力或工作紧张程度方面均未观察到统计学上的显著差异。在所选研究中,未涉及缺勤率和职业倦怠的具体结果。

结论

由于本系统综述中确定纳入的定量研究数量有限,无法确定在急症护理环境中,采用团队护理模式还是全病人护理模式组织护理工作对员工健康更有效。团队护理模式和全病人护理模式对护士的总体工作满意度、压力水平或人员流动率均无显著影响。本综述无法确定护理模式类型是否会影响缺勤率或职业倦怠,因为在任何已确定的研究中均未涉及这些内容。在评估哪种护理模式合适时应谨慎,决策需要考虑员工经验水平和员工技能组合。需要明确护理角色的定义。本综述表明,需要对这些护理模式进行进一步的定量研究,研究设计要合理,样本量要足够以应对参与者流失的情况,并探索每种模式对护士健康的影响,特别是针对职业倦怠和缺勤率的研究。需要统一术语,以便未来在国际层面进行比较和研究。未来关于护理模式的研究应包括经济分析,以为政策和实践提供全面信息。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验