• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日本监管要求的上市后数据库研究可用于评估重要的潜在风险以及已识别的风险。

Regulatory-required post-marketing database studies in Japan could be leveraged to assess important potential risks as well as identified risks.

作者信息

Yamazaki Hiroshi, Nakajo Ko, Hirose Naoki, Yan Li, Lee Sun Yeop, Zhang Yongjing, Qiu Hong, Ishiguro Chieko

机构信息

Global Epidemiology, Johnson & Johnson, Tokyo, Japan.

Global Epidemiology, Johnson & Johnson, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Front Pharmacol. 2025 Jul 21;16:1565314. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1565314. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fphar.2025.1565314
PMID:40761405
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12319243/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To investigate the characteristics of post-marketing database studies (PMDS) included in risk management plans (RMPs) across all therapeutic areas in Japan.

METHODS

Two researchers systematically and independently reviewed all RMPs listed on the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency website from April 2013 to December 2023. PMDS contained in RMPs were identified, reviewed, and summarized by study design, target objectives, and data source. Specific objectives were linked to the data source.

RESULTS

Among 648 RMPs retrieved/reviewed, 85 PMDS were identified from 63 RMPs targeting 138 safety and five effectiveness objectives. Among 85 PMDS, 57 (67.1%) PMDS targeted important identified risk and 29 (34.1%) targeted important potential risk. Cohort studies were the most prevalent study design (74/85, 87.1%), and 74.1% (63/85) included a comparator group. Common target safety objectives included "infections and infestations", "metabolism and nutrition disorders", "cardiac disorders" and "vascular disorders". The Medical Data Vision database was the most frequently used data source for PMDS (32/85, 37.5%) followed by the Medical Information Database Network (MID-NET) (18/85, 21.2%) and JMDC (9/85, 10.6%).

CONCLUSION

In Japan, PMDS are usually cohort studies with targeted safety objectives. Most studies currently target important identified risk rather than important potential risk and may not make full use of the advantages of PMDS that can include large populations, comparator groups, and that can assess the occurrence of rare adverse events. These results could be informative for pharmaceutical companies planning post-marketing studies as pharmacovigilance activities. Early public availability of PMDS protocols would promote improved study methodology and could potentially improve the scientific value of PMDS in Japan.

摘要

背景

调查日本所有治疗领域风险管理计划(RMP)中包含的上市后数据库研究(PMDS)的特征。

方法

两名研究人员系统地、独立地审查了2013年4月至2023年12月在药品和医疗器械局网站上列出的所有RMP。对RMP中包含的PMDS进行识别、审查,并按研究设计、目标和数据源进行总结。具体目标与数据源相关联。

结果

在检索/审查的648个RMP中,从针对138个安全性目标和5个有效性目标的63个RMP中识别出85个PMDS。在85个PMDS中,57个(67.1%)PMDS针对已识别的重要风险,29个(34.1%)针对重要潜在风险。队列研究是最常见的研究设计(74/85,87.1%),74.1%(63/85)包括一个对照组。常见的目标安全性目标包括“感染和寄生虫感染”、“代谢和营养紊乱”、“心脏疾病”和“血管疾病”。医学数据视觉数据库是PMDS最常用的数据源(32/85,37.5%),其次是医学信息数据库网络(MID-NET)(18/85,21.2%)和JMDC(9/85,10.6%)。

结论

在日本,PMDS通常是针对安全性目标的队列研究。目前大多数研究针对已识别的重要风险而非重要潜在风险,可能未充分利用PMDS可纳入大量人群、对照组并可评估罕见不良事件发生情况的优势。这些结果可能为计划开展上市后研究作为药物警戒活动的制药公司提供信息。PMDS方案的早期公开可用性将促进研究方法的改进,并有可能提高日本PMDS 的科学价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f04c/12319243/4c62d6eec704/fphar-16-1565314-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f04c/12319243/1e5b022bde1d/fphar-16-1565314-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f04c/12319243/4c62d6eec704/fphar-16-1565314-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f04c/12319243/1e5b022bde1d/fphar-16-1565314-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f04c/12319243/4c62d6eec704/fphar-16-1565314-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Regulatory-required post-marketing database studies in Japan could be leveraged to assess important potential risks as well as identified risks.日本监管要求的上市后数据库研究可用于评估重要的潜在风险以及已识别的风险。
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Jul 21;16:1565314. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1565314. eCollection 2025.
2
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
3
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
4
Sertindole for schizophrenia.用于治疗精神分裂症的舍吲哚。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD001715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001715.pub2.
5
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
6
Interventions to improve safe and effective medicines use by consumers: an overview of systematic reviews.改善消费者安全有效用药的干预措施:系统评价概述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 29;2014(4):CD007768. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007768.pub3.
7
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
8
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
9
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
10
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
A Sponsor's Perspective on the Contribution of Regulatory-Required Observational Post-Marketing Studies to Understanding Human Drug Product Benefit/Risk in Japan.监管要求的观察性上市后研究对理解日本药品的获益/风险的贡献:赞助商视角
Pharmaceut Med. 2024 May;38(3):217-224. doi: 10.1007/s40290-024-00521-2. Epub 2024 Mar 31.
2
Validation Study of Algorithms to Identify Malignant Tumors and Serious Infections in a Japanese Administrative Healthcare Database.日本行政医疗数据库中识别恶性肿瘤和严重感染算法的验证研究
Ann Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Jan 7;4(1):20-31. doi: 10.37737/ace.22004. eCollection 2022.
3
Process guide for inferential studies using healthcare data from routine clinical practice to evaluate causal effects of drugs (PRINCIPLED): considerations from the FDA Sentinel Innovation Center.
利用常规临床实践中的医疗数据评估药物因果效应的推断性研究流程指南(PRINCIPLED):来自美国食品药品监督管理局哨兵创新中心的考量
BMJ. 2024 Feb 12;384:e076460. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-076460.
4
Literature Review of Studies Using the National Database of the Health Insurance Claims of Japan (NDB): Limitations and Strategies in Using the NDB for Research.使用日本医疗保险索赔国家数据库(NDB)的研究文献综述:在研究中使用NDB的局限性与策略
JMA J. 2024 Jan 15;7(1):10-20. doi: 10.31662/jmaj.2023-0078. Epub 2023 Dec 27.
5
Real-world data: a brief review of the methods, applications, challenges and opportunities.真实世界数据:方法、应用、挑战和机遇的简要回顾。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Nov 5;22(1):287. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01768-6.
6
Descriptive Analysis for the Trend of Pharmacovigilance Planning in Risk Management Plans on New Drugs Approved During 2016-2019.描述性分析 2016-2019 年新药批准的风险管理计划中药物警戒计划的趋势。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2023 Jan;57(1):37-47. doi: 10.1007/s43441-022-00437-6. Epub 2022 Aug 13.
7
Context and Considerations for Use of Two Japanese Real-World Databases in Japan: Medical Data Vision and Japanese Medical Data Center.日本两个真实世界数据库(医学数据视野和日本医学数据中心)在日本的使用背景及考量因素
Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2022 Jun;9(2):175-187. doi: 10.1007/s40801-022-00296-5. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
8
Overview of the European post-authorisation study register post-authorization studies performed in Europe from September 2010 to December 2018.概述:2010 年 9 月至 2018 年 12 月期间在欧洲进行的上市后研究注册的欧洲上市后研究概述。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2022 Jun;31(6):689-705. doi: 10.1002/pds.5413. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
9
Real-World Data in the Postapproval Setting as Applied by the EMA and the US FDA.欧洲药品管理局(EMA)和美国食品药品监督管理局(US FDA)在批准后环境中应用的真实世界数据。
Clin Ther. 2022 Feb;44(2):306-322. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2021.12.010. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
10
Data resource profile: JMDC claims database sourced from health insurance societies.数据资源简介:源自健康保险协会的JMDC理赔数据库。
J Gen Fam Med. 2021 Feb 14;22(3):118-127. doi: 10.1002/jgf2.422. eCollection 2021 May.