Suppr超能文献

免疫检查点抑制剂联合化疗与贝伐单抗联合化疗治疗晚期驱动基因阴性非鳞状非小细胞肺癌的疗效比较:一项回顾性研究

Comparison of the Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Combined with Chemotherapy Versus Bevacizumab Combined with Chemotherapy in Advanced Driver Gene-Negative Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Study.

作者信息

Chen Wanwan, Dai Qiang, Ye Zhe, Huang Yiwei

机构信息

Department of Pathology, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, 325000, People's Republic of China.

Department of Oncology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University (Ruian People's Hospital), Wenzhou, Zhejiang, 325200, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025 Jul 29;18:4279-4289. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S535853. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus chemotherapy versus bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in advanced driver gene-negative non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NS-NSCLC).

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 199 patients treated from October 2015 to January 2022. Group A (n=103) received ICIs plus chemotherapy (pemetrexed + cisplatin), while Group B (n=96) received bevacizumab plus the same chemotherapy. Outcomes included treatment response, serum tumor markers (CEA, CA-125, CA-199), immunoglobulins (IgA, IgG, IgM), adverse reactions, and survival [progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS)].

RESULTS

Group A had a significantly higher objective response rate (59.22% vs 36.46%, P=0.001). Tumor marker levels decreased more in Group A (P<0.05), while declines in immunoglobulin levels were less pronounced (P<0.05). Adverse events were similar between groups (P>0.05). Group A had a longer median PFS (11.13 vs 7.37 months, P<0.05), and a non-significant trend toward longer OS (20.87 vs 18.4 months, P=0.159).

CONCLUSION

ICIs combined with chemotherapy improved treatment efficacy and PFS compared to bevacizumab-based therapy in advanced driver gene-negative NS-NSCLC, with manageable safety and less impact on immune function.

摘要

目的

比较免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)联合化疗与贝伐单抗联合化疗在晚期驱动基因阴性非鳞状非小细胞肺癌(NS-NSCLC)中的疗效和安全性。

方法

这项回顾性队列研究纳入了2015年10月至2022年1月期间接受治疗的199例患者。A组(n=103)接受ICIs联合化疗(培美曲塞+顺铂),而B组(n=96)接受贝伐单抗联合相同化疗。观察指标包括治疗反应、血清肿瘤标志物(CEA、CA-125、CA-199)、免疫球蛋白(IgA、IgG、IgM)、不良反应以及生存率[无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)]。

结果

A组的客观缓解率显著更高(59.22%对36.46%,P=0.001)。A组肿瘤标志物水平下降更多(P<0.05),而免疫球蛋白水平下降不太明显(P<0.05)。两组间不良事件相似(P>0.05)。A组的中位PFS更长(11.13对7.37个月,P<0.05),OS有延长的趋势但无统计学意义(20.87对18.4个月,P=0.159)。

结论

在晚期驱动基因阴性的NS-NSCLC中,与基于贝伐单抗的治疗相比,ICIs联合化疗提高了治疗疗效和PFS,安全性可控,对免疫功能影响较小。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/302e/12318848/beb5811e0a11/JMDH-18-4279-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验