Suppr超能文献

20个国家内群体偏袒的认知过程:一项关于文化、行为和认知的眼动追踪调查。

Cognitive processes of ingroup favoritism across 20 countries: An eye-tracking investigation of culture, behavior, and cognition.

作者信息

Rahal Rima-Maria, Schulze Spüntrup Frederik

机构信息

Behavioral Law and Economics, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Bonn 53133, Germany.

Institute for Cognition and Behavior, Vienna University of Economics and Business, Wien 1020, Austria.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Aug 12;122(32):e2417456122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2417456122. Epub 2025 Aug 5.

Abstract

Whether and to what degree culture modifies cognition has been an area of research often limited by possibilities to gather relevant data across societies. In this project, we leverage webcam-based eye-tracking to study cultural variations of cognitive processes underlying in-group favoritism. Participants (n = 1850, k = 20) are assigned to an in-group based on a color perception task, complete a group reinforcement stage, and then make decisions to allocate points between themselves and random matched players in a repeated decomposed dictator game, facing either an in- or an out-group member. During this task, we recorded eye-gaze with participants' webcams. Results show substantial variation in behavioral in-group favoritism across cultures, linking discrimination based on group membership to higher societal uncertainty. Individual preferences for prosociality conditioned differences in visual search effort, but the directionality of the effect differs between countries. Individual-level predictors explained participants remaining colorblind toward others' group membership, where society-level predictors did not. Overall, we demonstrate the importance of taking culture into account when assessing cognitive processes underlying behavior. Implications for globally oriented policymaking to reduce discrimination are discussed.

摘要

文化是否以及在何种程度上会改变认知,一直是一个研究领域,常常受到跨社会收集相关数据可能性的限制。在这个项目中,我们利用基于网络摄像头的眼动追踪技术来研究内群体偏袒背后认知过程的文化差异。参与者(n = 1850,k = 20)根据颜色感知任务被分配到一个内群体,完成一个群体强化阶段,然后在一个重复的分解独裁者博弈中,面对内群体或外群体成员,做出在自己和随机匹配玩家之间分配点数的决策。在这个任务过程中,我们用参与者的网络摄像头记录他们的目光注视。结果显示,跨文化的行为内群体偏袒存在显著差异,将基于群体成员身份的歧视与更高的社会不确定性联系起来。个体对亲社会行为的偏好调节了视觉搜索努力的差异,但这种影响的方向性在不同国家有所不同。个体层面的预测因素解释了参与者对他人群体成员身份保持无视,而社会层面的预测因素则不然。总体而言,我们证明了在评估行为背后的认知过程时考虑文化的重要性。讨论了对旨在减少歧视的全球导向型政策制定的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b93/12358900/9400995a74ed/pnas.2417456122fig01.jpg

相似文献

1
Cognitive processes of ingroup favoritism across 20 countries: An eye-tracking investigation of culture, behavior, and cognition.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Aug 12;122(32):e2417456122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2417456122. Epub 2025 Aug 5.
4
Hunger shifts attention and attribute weighting in dietary choice.
Elife. 2025 Jul 2;13:RP103736. doi: 10.7554/eLife.103736.
5
The Effect of Labeling During Simulated Contact on Attitudes Toward Autistic Adults.
Autism Adulthood. 2025 Feb 5;7(1):93-99. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0081. eCollection 2025 Feb.
6
Reminiscence therapy for dementia.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 1;3(3):CD001120. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001120.pub3.
7
Stigma Management Strategies of Autistic Social Media Users.
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):273-282. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0095. eCollection 2025 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Global Consciousness Predicts Behavioral Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic: Empirical Evidence From 35 Cultures.
Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2023 Jun;14(5):662-671. doi: 10.1177/19485506221124392. Epub 2022 Sep 16.
2
Cross-cultural variation in cooperation: A meta-analysis.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2022 Nov;123(5):1024-1088. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000389. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
3
National parochialism is ubiquitous across 42 nations around the world.
Nat Commun. 2021 Jul 22;12(1):4456. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24787-1.
4
It's time to reimagine sample diversity and retire the WEIRD dichotomy.
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Aug;5(8):971-972. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01175-9.
5
The foreign language effect on decision-making: A meta-analysis.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Aug;28(4):1131-1141. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01871-z. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
6
The Origins and Psychology of Human Cooperation.
Annu Rev Psychol. 2021 Jan 4;72:207-240. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-081920-042106. Epub 2020 Oct 2.
7
Attentional priorities drive effects of time pressure on altruistic choice.
Nat Commun. 2020 Jul 15;11(1):3534. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17326-x.
8
Health equity and COVID-19: global perspectives.
Int J Equity Health. 2020 Jun 26;19(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01218-z.
10
Towards a Cognitive Science of the Human: Cross-Cultural Approaches and Their Urgency.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 Aug;24(8):620-638. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.05.007. Epub 2020 Jun 10.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验