• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Cement Mantle Screws in Periprosthetic Hip Fracture Fixation Near Well-Fixed Femoral Stems May Not Impact Short-Term Femoral Stem Survivorship.

作者信息

Shaw James, Patel Ruby G, Sculco Peter K, Wright-Chisem Joshua, Gadinsky Naomi E, Klinger Craig E, Helfet David L, Lorich Dean G, Wellman David S

机构信息

Hospital for Special Surgery, New York Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY.

Westchester Medical Center, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York.

出版信息

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2025 Sep 17;107(18):2049-2059. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.24.00920. Epub 2025 Aug 5.

DOI:10.2106/JBJS.24.00920
PMID:40763211
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Vancouver Type-B1 and C periprosthetic hip fractures have traditionally been treated using single- or double-plate fixation constructs. Concern exists regarding screws within the cement mantle due to the theoretical risk of cement fracture and eventual prosthetic loosening. The aim of this study was to assess femoral stem survivorship in patients with Vancouver Type-B1 or C fractures around a well-fixed cemented femoral component who were treated with a plate construct and screws into the cement mantle. The hypothesis was that screw fixation into the cement mantle would not compromise stem fixation.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of patients who were consecutively, surgically treated for a periprosthetic fracture around a femoral stem by 3 surgeons, as identified through a search of records from January 1, 2007, to January 1, 2023. A total of 112 consecutive patients with Vancouver Type-B1 or C periprosthetic femoral fractures treated at our institutions were reviewed. Patients who underwent fixation using plate constructs with ≥1 screw within the cement mantle around the stem were included. Patients were followed until union, revision due to plate construct failure, or stem revision. Other complications, including alignment loss, cemented stem subsidence, radiographic stem loosening, and new cement-mantle fractures, were assessed.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients (19 female; 27 White or Caucasian; 3 Hispanic or Latino; mean age, 81.4 ± 8.7 years) met the inclusion criteria. Radiographic union was achieved in 26 patients (92.9%). The study included 8 (28.6%) interprosthetic fractures between a total hip arthroplasty prosthesis and a total knee arthroplasty prosthesis. The mean union time was 8.0 ± 4.6 months (range, 2.2 to 25.6 weeks). The mean follow-up duration following the index procedure was 33.3 ± 24.0 months (range, 6.1 to 86.2 months). Two nonunions occurred (7.1%), both involving plate failure. Both patients required revision of the femoral prosthesis, which was not loose at the time of reoperation. No stem subsidence or cement mantle fractures occurred during follow-up, and no revisions were performed for stem loosening.

CONCLUSIONS

Screw fixation into cement around a well-fixed stem did not contribute to stem loosening at short-term follow-up. There were no isolated femoral component revisions for cement mantle issues.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

摘要

相似文献

1
Cement Mantle Screws in Periprosthetic Hip Fracture Fixation Near Well-Fixed Femoral Stems May Not Impact Short-Term Femoral Stem Survivorship.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2025 Sep 17;107(18):2049-2059. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.24.00920. Epub 2025 Aug 5.
2
What Is the Cumulative Incidence of Femoral Stem Revision and Stem Complication in Cemented and Uncemented Hip Arthroplasty for Proximal Femoral Metastatic Bone Disease?对于股骨近端转移性骨病,骨水泥型和非骨水泥型髋关节置换术中股骨柄翻修及柄并发症的累积发生率是多少?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jun 10. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003541.
3
What Are the Functional, Radiographic, and Survivorship Outcomes of a Modified Cup-cage Technique for Pelvic Discontinuity?改良杯笼技术治疗骨盆不连续性的功能、影像学和生存结果如何?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2149-2160. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003186. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
4
Are There Differences in Performance Among Femoral Stem Brands Utilized in Cementless Hemiarthroplasty for Treatment of Geriatric Femoral Neck Fractures?在用于治疗老年股骨颈骨折的非骨水泥半髋关节置换术中,不同品牌的股骨柄在性能上是否存在差异?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Feb 1;483(2):253-264. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003222. Epub 2024 Aug 15.
5
Outcomes of cemented and uncemented stem fixation in Vancouver B1 periprosthetic femur fractures treated with locking plates.使用锁定钢板治疗温哥华B1型股骨假体周围骨折时骨水泥型和非骨水泥型股骨柄固定的疗效
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Jul 11;20(1):641. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05979-7.
6
Periprosthetic fractures around cemented hip hemiarthroplasty: Are SOFCOT-Vancouver recommendations mandatory? A comparative study with propensity score matching.骨水泥型髋关节半关节置换术周围的假体周围骨折:SOFCOT-温哥华建议是强制性的吗?一项倾向评分匹配的比较研究。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2025 Sep;111(5):104189. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104189. Epub 2025 Feb 17.
7
Outcomes of Primary Cementless Femoral Stems Used in Revision Hip Arthroplasty.翻修髋关节置换术中使用的初次非骨水泥型股骨柄的疗效
J Arthroplasty. 2025 Sep;40(9S1):S436-S441. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2025.05.023. Epub 2025 May 13.
8
Is 18 F-fluoride PET/CT an Accurate Tool to Diagnose Loosening After Total Joint Arthroplasty?18F-氟化物PET/CT是诊断全关节置换术后假体松动的准确工具吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Mar 1;483(3):415-428. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003228. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
9
What Factors Are Associated With Implant Revision in the Treatment of Pathologic Subtrochanteric Femur Fractures?在病理性股骨转子下骨折的治疗中,哪些因素与植入物翻修相关?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Mar 1;483(3):473-484. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003291. Epub 2024 Oct 22.
10
Surgical interventions for treating intracapsular hip fractures in older adults: a network meta-analysis.老年人囊内型髋部骨折的手术治疗:网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 14;2(2):CD013404. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013404.pub2.