• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重症监护病房共同决策期间家庭成员与医生之间的对话:一项定性观察研究。

Conversations Between Family Members and Physicians in Intensive Care Unit During Shared Decision-Making: A Qualitative Observational Study.

作者信息

Lu Qing, Ji Juan, Lu Xiao-Yan, Yin Qiong-Hua, Yang Yi-Qun

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, People's Republic of China.

Department of Outpatient, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025 Jul 31;18:4535-4550. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S525581. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.2147/JMDH.S525581
PMID:40765734
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12323792/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

It is necessary to understand the decision-making dynamics between physicians and families so as to help families better participate in shared decision-making.

METHODS

A qualitative observational research was conducted. Conversations between physicians and families at a tertiary care hospital from July to December 2022 were audio-recorded. The families were those with critically ill patients lacking decision-making capacity in the intensive care unit. Data were analyzed using an inductive content analysis method.

RESULTS

A total of 40 conversations were analyzed. There were 12, 15, and 13 decisions made on the day of hospital admission, when the patient's condition changed, and during the end-of-life situation, respectively. In all decision-making stages, some sharing of information occurred between physicians and families. The degree of sharing differed depending on the decision-making context. In end-of-life situations, decision-making mostly involved families, which might only represent the values and preferences from family members but not patients.

CONCLUSION

Evidence of shared decision-making between physicians and family members was low. The levels of shared decision-making varied according to the context in which decisions were made. The shared decision-making between physicians and families might only represent the values and preferences from family members but not patients. Family members often faced decision-making difficulties and regrets.

摘要

引言

有必要了解医生与家属之间的决策动态,以帮助家属更好地参与共同决策。

方法

进行了一项定性观察研究。对一家三级护理医院2022年7月至12月期间医生与家属之间的对话进行了录音。这些家属是在重症监护病房中患有缺乏决策能力的重症患者的家属。采用归纳性内容分析法对数据进行分析。

结果

共分析了40次对话。分别在入院当天、患者病情变化时以及临终阶段做出了12次、15次和13次决策。在所有决策阶段,医生与家属之间都有一定程度的信息共享。共享程度因决策背景而异。在临终阶段,决策大多由家属做出,这可能仅代表家庭成员而非患者的价值观和偏好。

结论

医生与家属之间共同决策的证据较少。共同决策的水平因决策背景而异。医生与家属之间的共同决策可能仅代表家庭成员而非患者的价值观和偏好。家属经常面临决策困难和遗憾。

相似文献

1
Conversations Between Family Members and Physicians in Intensive Care Unit During Shared Decision-Making: A Qualitative Observational Study.重症监护病房共同决策期间家庭成员与医生之间的对话:一项定性观察研究。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025 Jul 31;18:4535-4550. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S525581. eCollection 2025.
2
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.干预健康从业者与受影响者之间关于临终关怀的人际沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.
3
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
4
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
5
Shared decision-making for people with asthma.哮喘患者的共同决策
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 3;10(10):CD012330. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012330.pub2.
6
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
7
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临健康治疗或筛查决策的人群提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 28(1):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub4.
8
Family experiences and perceptions of intensive care unit care and communication during the COVID-19 pandemic.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,家庭对重症监护病房护理和沟通的体验和看法。
Aust Crit Care. 2023 May;36(3):350-360. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2022.03.003. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
9
Contraceptive Decision-Making Among Young College Men and Women in Ethiopia: Results of the Qualitative Study.埃塞俄比亚青年男女的避孕决策:定性研究结果。
Inquiry. 2023 Jan-Dec;60:469580231177848. doi: 10.1177/00469580231177848.
10
Can We Enhance Shared Decision-making for Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery? A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences.我们能否加强髋臼周围截骨术的共同决策?一项关于患者体验的定性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):120-136. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003198. Epub 2024 Jul 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Tough choices: the experience of family members of critically ill patients participating in ECMO treatment decision-making: a descriptive qualitative study.艰难的抉择:参与体外膜肺氧合治疗决策的重症患者家庭成员的经历:一项描述性定性研究
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Feb 7;25(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-02876-1.
2
When western concept meets eastern culture: Exploring the impact of Confucianism on shared decision-making in China.当西方观念遇上东方文化:探究儒家思想对中国共同决策的影响。
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2024 Sep 2;11(11):100586. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2024.100586. eCollection 2024 Nov.
3
Prevalence and predictors of shared decision-making in goals-of-care clinician-family meetings for critically ill neurologic patients: a multi-center mixed-methods study.重症神经疾病患者的临床医生-家庭治疗目标会议中共享决策的流行率及其预测因素:一项多中心混合方法研究。
Crit Care. 2023 Oct 21;27(1):403. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04693-2.
4
Prevalence of long-term decision regret and associated risk factors in a large cohort of ICU surrogate decision makers.在一个大型 ICU 替代决策制定者队列中,长期决策后悔的流行率及其相关危险因素。
Crit Care. 2023 Feb 16;27(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04332-w.
5
Shared decision-making as a method of care.共同决策作为一种护理方法。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2023 Aug;28(4):213-217. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112068. Epub 2022 Dec 2.
6
Family involvement in medical decision making in Europe and the United States: A replication and extension in five Countries.家庭在欧洲和美国医疗决策中的参与:五个国家的复制与扩展。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 May;301:114932. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114932. Epub 2022 Mar 26.
7
Factors influencing family involvement in treatment decision-making for older patients with cancer: A scoping review.影响老年癌症患者家庭参与治疗决策的因素:一项范围综述
J Geriatr Oncol. 2022 May;13(4):391-397. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2021.11.003. Epub 2021 Nov 12.
8
NICE shared decision making guidelines and mental health: challenges for research, practice and implementation.英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)的共同决策指南与心理健康:研究、实践与实施面临的挑战
BJPsych Open. 2021 Sep 2;7(5):e154. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2021.987.
9
SRQR and COREQ Reporting Guidelines for Qualitative Studies.定性研究的SRQR和COREQ报告指南。
JAMA Surg. 2021 Sep 1;156(9):875-876. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.0525.
10
Negotiating the 'buffet' of choice: advances in technology and end-of-life decision-making in the intensive care unit setting.协商选择“自助餐”:重症监护病房技术进步与临终决策。
Sociol Health Illn. 2020 May;42(4):877-891. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13068. Epub 2020 Mar 5.