Li Wenwei, Feng Huiyan, Ye Qingjian
Department of Gynaecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jul 22;12:1576490. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1576490. eCollection 2025.
Endometriosis is a prevalent gynecological disorder that is estimated to affect approximately 10% of women of childbearing age globally. However, the condition remains significantly under-or misrecognized, and the mean time to diagnosis is several years. These delays result in increased symptom severity, diminished quality of life, and adverse long-term reproductive outcomes. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to estimate the sources of diagnostic delay and their effects.
The articles were retrieved from PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases after performing a rigorous literature search. The initial search yielded 2,348 records, and 10 articles were included in the final analysis. Causes of diagnostic delay were classified under patient, physician, and systems attributes. Random-effects analysis was used to estimate the overall SMDs with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). For the primary analysis, subgroup analyses and evaluation of heterogeneity ( statistic) were conducted. Publication bias was checked using Egger's test and funnel plots.
Patient-related factors demonstrated a significant pooled effect size (SMD: 1.94, 95% CI: 1.62-2.27, < 0.001), with delays in seeking medical attention (SMD: 2.14, 95% CI: 1.36-2.92) contributing most prominently. Provider-related factors, including misdiagnosis and reliance on non-specific diagnostics, also had a substantial pooled effect size (SMD: 2.00, 95% CI: 1.72-2.28, < 0.001), with low heterogeneity ( = 3%). System-related factors, such as referral pathways and geographic disparities, were not analyzed separately due to insufficient data for the subgroup. Funnel plot analysis showed no significant publication bias (Egger's test = 0.57).
The results indicate that diagnostic delays in endometriosis are a function of multiple factors, with key contributions from patient and provider-related barriers. To close these gaps, targeted interventions such as public education to combat symptom normalization and stigmatization, more comprehensive provider training, and streamlined diagnostic pathways are needed. Future research can evaluate system-level changes and non-invasive diagnostic tools to reduce systemic delays further.
子宫内膜异位症是一种常见的妇科疾病,据估计全球约10%的育龄妇女受其影响。然而,该病仍未得到充分认识或被误诊,平均诊断时间长达数年。这些延误导致症状加重、生活质量下降以及长期生殖不良后果。因此,本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是评估诊断延误的原因及其影响。
在进行严格的文献检索后,从PubMed、Cochrane和谷歌学术数据库中检索文章。初步检索得到2348条记录,最终纳入分析的有10篇文章。诊断延误的原因分为患者、医生和系统因素。采用随机效应分析估计总体标准化均数差(SMD)及95%置信区间(CI)。进行了亚组分析和异质性(统计量)评估作为主要分析。使用Egger检验和漏斗图检查发表偏倚。
患者相关因素显示出显著的合并效应量(SMD:1.94,95%CI:1.62 - 2.27,<0.001),其中就医延迟(SMD:2.14,95%CI:1.36 - 2.92)的影响最为突出。医生相关因素,包括误诊和依赖非特异性诊断方法,也有较大的合并效应量(SMD:2.00,95%CI:1.72 - 2.28,<0.001),异质性较低(=3%)。由于亚组数据不足,未单独分析系统相关因素,如转诊途径和地理差异。漏斗图分析显示无显著发表偏倚(Egger检验=0.57)。
结果表明,子宫内膜异位症的诊断延误是多种因素作用的结果,主要来自患者和医生相关的障碍。为了缩小这些差距,需要采取针对性干预措施,如开展公众教育以消除症状正常化和污名化观念、进行更全面的医生培训以及简化诊断途径。未来的研究可以评估系统层面的变化和非侵入性诊断工具,以进一步减少系统性延误。