Ellakany Passent, A Al-Dulaijan Yousif, M Aly Nourhan, Alshehri Turki, T Alameer Shahad, Akhtar Sultan, Al Dehailan Laila
Division of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35209, USA.
Department of Substitutive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Eastern Province, 31441, Saudi Arabia.
F1000Res. 2025 Jun 19;13:1310. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.157128.2. eCollection 2024.
This study examined the effect of thermocycling on the flexural strength properties of four CAD/CAM ceramic materials at different thicknesses.
Four CAD/CAM ceramics of different types: advanced lithium disilicate (ALD), zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (ZLS) lithium disilicate (LD), and leucite reinforced (LE), and at three varying thicknesses 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 mm were examined. After subjecting all specimens to 5000 thermomechanical cycles, flexural strength was determined using a universal testing apparatus. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was employed for analysis. Two factorial ANOVA models assessed the association of different factors (ceramic type and thickness) with flexural strength and elastic modulus. The 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and adjusted means were computed. A p-value < 0.05 was designated significant.
ZLS exhibited the highest flexural strength at 1.5 mm thickness, while LD showed the highest Young's modulus of elasticity. The lowest flexural strength was observed in the 0.5 mm thickness group of all tested groups. There were notable variations in flexural strength across all ceramic materials, with the highest adjusted mean strength in the ZLS group, ALD, LD, and LE, respectively. Additionally, significant differences were noted in ceramic thickness, with 1.5 mm thickness showing the highest strength and 0.5 mm thickness the lowest.
Ceramic material thickness significantly impacts flexural strength, with 1.5 mm thickness deemed suitable for posterior restorations. Ceramic materials with zirconia fillers or matrix demonstrated higher flexural strength than other ceramics.
本研究考察了热循环对四种不同厚度的计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造(CAD/CAM)陶瓷材料抗弯强度性能的影响。
对四种不同类型的CAD/CAM陶瓷进行研究:高透锂二硅酸盐(ALD)、氧化锆增强锂硅酸盐(ZLS)、锂二硅酸盐(LD)和白榴石增强(LE),并设置三种不同厚度,分别为0.5、1.0和1.5毫米。所有试样经5000次热机械循环后,使用万能试验机测定抗弯强度。采用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)进行分析。双因素方差分析模型评估不同因素(陶瓷类型和厚度)与抗弯强度和弹性模量之间的关联。计算95%置信区间(CIs)和校正均值。p值<0.05被视为具有显著性。
ZLS在1.5毫米厚度时表现出最高的抗弯强度,而LD显示出最高的杨氏弹性模量。在所有测试组的0.5毫米厚度组中观察到最低的抗弯强度。所有陶瓷材料的抗弯强度存在显著差异,ZLS组、ALD组、LD组和LE组的校正平均强度最高。此外,陶瓷厚度存在显著差异,1.5毫米厚度显示出最高强度,0.5毫米厚度最低。
陶瓷材料厚度显著影响抗弯强度,1.5毫米厚度被认为适用于后牙修复。含有氧化锆填料或基体的陶瓷材料比其他陶瓷表现出更高的抗弯强度。