Singh Varsha, Tripathi Manjari, Chandra Sarat P, Verma Rohit, Jha Sushil Kumar, Chhabra Harvinder Singh, Chakravarty Mrinmoy, Mitra Shambhovi, B Indupriya, Jha Ankit, Sharma Sakshi, Pandey Jyotsna, Pandey Divyanshi, Shamshad Insha, Ahlawat Ekta, Saha Titli, César Chloé, Jain Suman
Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (IIT), New Delhi, India.
Department of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 22;16:1551477. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1551477. eCollection 2025.
Rodent models are widely used to understand brain pathologies and address cognitive deficits experienced by humans diagnosed with clinical disorders. However, stark differences in the nervous system and in the environmental demands of rodents and humans make it difficult to translate insights from rodents to humans. Age and sex further increase vulnerability to disorders via experiences marked by neglect, deprivation, threat, and constraining environments instead of care, nutrition, safety, and enriching environment. These differences impact cognitive processing of rewards, risks, and decision-making. Although rodent models allow for investigations of precise brain regions critical for decision-making, such as the prefrontal cortex (PFC), and enable controlled exposure to stress and disorder trajectories, the prefrontal cortex of rodents and humans differ in size, cytoarchitecture, and anatomical-functional organization. This non-analogous structural-functional mapping of brain regions and cognitive deficits result in rodent models that fail to establish causal links of brain pathophysiology and clinical conditions, and the model remains a poor depiction of cognitive deficits experienced by humans. We argue that the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) is characterized by molecules to behavior, relies on intact cognitive, affective, and motivational systems of inhibitive control involving cortico-limbic circuitry in both humans and rodents.
We conducted a rodent-human task comparison under stress and disruption in the central nervous system (CNS) to link cognitive deficits in poor decision-making with disruptions in brain architecture. A cross-species comparison, accounting for age and sex, was performed on pooled data from human and rodent IGT studies (N = 892; humans = 722; rodents = 170) to examine organism-, age-, and sex-specific decision-making under three levels of stress-psychological stress, CNS perturbation, and limbic perturbation-that can impair decision-making.
The results from four mixed-factor analyses of variances corrected for multiple group comparison showed that stress, CNS perturbation, and limbic perturbations impaired decision making. The adverse effects of psychological stress and CNS perturbations were unique to human task performance, while the adverse effect of limbic perturbations was age-specific in humans and sex-specific in rodents. Infrequent punishment choice was prominent in humans (women), and the healthy group compared to rodents (males) and the CNS perturbed group.
Findings suggest that the task might be useful for producing reliable cross-species comparisons of causal mechanisms underlying cognitive deficits in clinical disorders. Preclinical and clinical studies could use the task to reduce the translational gap in neurobiological and clinical neuroscience in ways that might be useful in improving human health.
啮齿动物模型被广泛用于了解脑部病理学,并解决被诊断患有临床疾病的人类所经历的认知缺陷。然而,啮齿动物和人类在神经系统以及环境需求方面存在显著差异,这使得将从啮齿动物获得的见解转化到人类身上变得困难。年龄和性别会通过忽视、剥夺、威胁和受限环境而非关爱、营养、安全和丰富环境等经历,进一步增加对疾病的易感性。这些差异会影响对奖励、风险和决策的认知处理。尽管啮齿动物模型允许对决策至关重要的精确脑区进行研究,例如前额叶皮层(PFC),并能够控制对压力和疾病轨迹的暴露,但啮齿动物和人类的前额叶皮层在大小、细胞结构和解剖功能组织方面存在差异。这种脑区与认知缺陷之间非类似的结构-功能映射导致啮齿动物模型无法建立脑部病理生理学与临床状况之间的因果联系,并且该模型仍然无法很好地描绘人类所经历的认知缺陷。我们认为爱荷华赌博任务(IGT)具有从分子到行为的特征,依赖于人类和啮齿动物中涉及皮质-边缘回路的完整认知、情感和抑制控制动机系统。
我们在中枢神经系统(CNS)的压力和破坏条件下进行了啮齿动物与人类任务比较,以将决策不良中的认知缺陷与脑结构破坏联系起来。对来自人类和啮齿动物IGT研究的汇总数据(N = 892;人类 = 722;啮齿动物 = 170)进行了跨物种比较,考虑了年龄和性别,以检查在心理压力、CNS扰动和边缘系统扰动这三种会损害决策的压力水平下特定生物体、年龄和性别的决策情况。
四项针对多组比较进行校正的混合因素方差分析结果表明,压力、CNS扰动和边缘系统扰动会损害决策。心理压力和CNS扰动的不利影响在人类任务表现中是独特的,而边缘系统扰动的不利影响在人类中具有年龄特异性,在啮齿动物中具有性别特异性。在人类(女性)以及与啮齿动物(雄性)和CNS扰动组相比的健康组中,不频繁的惩罚选择更为突出。
研究结果表明,该任务可能有助于对临床疾病中认知缺陷背后的因果机制进行可靠的跨物种比较。临床前和临床研究可以使用该任务来缩小神经生物学和临床神经科学中的转化差距,这可能有助于改善人类健康。