Suppr超能文献

Precision over quantity: identifying trustworthy genomic risk stratification models.

作者信息

Costa Filho Valbert Oliveira, Passos Pedro Robson Costa

机构信息

Center of Research and Drug Development, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.

出版信息

Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2025 Aug 1;23:eCE1726. doi: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2025CE1726. eCollection 2025.

Abstract
摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8635/12266841/1f824737f71e/2317-6385-eins-23-eCE1726-gf01.jpg

相似文献

1
Precision over quantity: identifying trustworthy genomic risk stratification models.
Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2025 Aug 1;23:eCE1726. doi: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2025CE1726. eCollection 2025.
4
Who is trustworthy? Predicting trustworthy intentions and behavior.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2018 Sep;115(3):468-494. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000136. Epub 2018 Jul 12.
7
From Pixels to Principles: A Decade of Progress and Landscape in Trustworthy Computer Vision.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2024 Jun 10;30(3):26. doi: 10.1007/s11948-024-00480-6.
8
Novel Genomic Risk Stratification Model for Primary Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST) in the Adjuvant Therapy Era.
Clin Cancer Res. 2023 Oct 2;29(19):3974-3985. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-23-1184.
9
Tissue-based gene expression testing in localized prostate cancer.
Curr Opin Urol. 2025 Jul 1;35(4):432-438. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000001289. Epub 2025 May 2.
10
Developing Novel Genomic Risk Stratification Models in Soft Tissue and Uterine Leiomyosarcoma.
Clin Cancer Res. 2024 May 15;30(10):2260-2271. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-0148.

本文引用的文献

1
Radiomics machine learning study with a small sample size: Single random training-test set split may lead to unreliable results.
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 12;16(8):e0256152. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256152. eCollection 2021.
3
Don't split your data.
Eur J Epidemiol. 2010 May;25(5):283-4. doi: 10.1007/s10654-010-9447-3. Epub 2010 Mar 26.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验