• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器学习模型对入院时成人院内死亡率的前瞻性和外部评估。

Prospective and External Evaluation of a Machine Learning Model to Predict In-Hospital Mortality of Adults at Time of Admission.

机构信息

Duke Institute for Health Innovation, Durham, North Carolina.

Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Feb 5;3(2):e1920733. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.20733.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.20733
PMID:32031645
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

The ability to accurately predict in-hospital mortality for patients at the time of admission could improve clinical and operational decision-making and outcomes. Few of the machine learning models that have been developed to predict in-hospital death are both broadly applicable to all adult patients across a health system and readily implementable. Similarly, few have been implemented, and none have been evaluated prospectively and externally validated.

OBJECTIVES

To prospectively and externally validate a machine learning model that predicts in-hospital mortality for all adult patients at the time of hospital admission and to design the model using commonly available electronic health record data and accessible computational methods.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this prognostic study, electronic health record data from a total of 43 180 hospitalizations representing 31 003 unique adult patients admitted to a quaternary academic hospital (hospital A) from October 1, 2014, to December 31, 2015, formed a training and validation cohort. The model was further validated in additional cohorts spanning from March 1, 2018, to August 31, 2018, using 16 122 hospitalizations representing 13 094 unique adult patients admitted to hospital A, 6586 hospitalizations representing 5613 unique adult patients admitted to hospital B, and 4086 hospitalizations representing 3428 unique adult patients admitted to hospital C. The model was integrated into the production electronic health record system and prospectively validated on a cohort of 5273 hospitalizations representing 4525 unique adult patients admitted to hospital A between February 14, 2019, and April 15, 2019.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The main outcome was in-hospital mortality. Model performance was quantified using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and area under the precision recall curve.

RESULTS

A total of 75 247 hospital admissions (median [interquartile range] patient age, 59.5 [29.0] years; 45.9% involving male patients) were included in the study. The in-hospital mortality rates for the training validation; retrospective validations at hospitals A, B, and C; and prospective validation cohorts were 3.0%, 2.7%, 1.8%, 2.1%, and 1.6%, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves were 0.87 (95% CI, 0.83-0.89), 0.85 (95% CI, 0.83-0.87), 0.89 (95% CI, 0.86-0.92), 0.84 (95% CI, 0.80-0.89), and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.83-0.90), respectively. The area under the precision recall curves were 0.29 (95% CI, 0.25-0.37), 0.17 (95% CI, 0.13-0.22), 0.22 (95% CI, 0.14-0.31), 0.13 (95% CI, 0.08-0.21), and 0.14 (95% CI, 0.09-0.21), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Prospective and multisite retrospective evaluations of a machine learning model demonstrated good discrimination of in-hospital mortality for adult patients at the time of admission. The data elements, methods, and patient selection make the model implementable at a system level.

摘要

重要性

在患者入院时准确预测住院死亡率可以改善临床和运营决策及结果。已经开发出的用于预测住院死亡的少数机器学习模型,要么在整个医疗体系中广泛适用于所有成年患者,要么易于实施。同样,这些模型很少被实施,也没有被前瞻性地评估和外部验证。

目的

前瞻性和外部验证一种用于预测所有成年患者入院时住院死亡率的机器学习模型,并使用常见的电子健康记录数据和可访问的计算方法来设计该模型。

设计、地点和参与者:在这项预后研究中,总共 43180 次住院的电子健康记录数据代表了 31003 名独特的成年患者,这些患者于 2014 年 10 月 1 日至 2015 年 12 月 31 日从一家四级学术医院(医院 A)入院,形成了一个训练和验证队列。该模型在另外三个队列中进一步得到验证,这三个队列分别是 2018 年 3 月 1 日至 2018 年 8 月 31 日期间使用 16122 次住院的电子健康记录数据,代表了 13094 名独特的成年患者从医院 A 入院;6586 次住院的电子健康记录数据,代表了 5613 名独特的成年患者从医院 B 入院;以及 4086 次住院的电子健康记录数据,代表了 3428 名独特的成年患者从医院 C 入院。该模型被集成到生产电子健康记录系统中,并在 2019 年 2 月 14 日至 2019 年 4 月 15 日期间对 5273 次住院的队列进行了前瞻性验证,这些住院代表了 4525 名独特的成年患者从医院 A 入院。

主要结果和测量

主要结果是住院死亡率。使用接受者操作特征曲线下的面积和精度召回曲线下的面积来量化模型性能。

结果

共纳入 75247 次住院(中位数[四分位间距]患者年龄,59.5[29.0]岁;45.9%的患者为男性)。在训练验证、医院 A、B 和 C 的回顾性验证以及前瞻性验证队列中,住院死亡率分别为 3.0%、2.7%、1.8%、2.1%和 1.6%。接受者操作特征曲线下的面积分别为 0.87(95%CI,0.83-0.89)、0.85(95%CI,0.83-0.87)、0.89(95%CI,0.86-0.92)、0.84(95%CI,0.80-0.89)和 0.86(95%CI,0.83-0.90)。精度召回曲线下的面积分别为 0.29(95%CI,0.25-0.37)、0.17(95%CI,0.13-0.22)、0.22(95%CI,0.14-0.31)、0.13(95%CI,0.08-0.21)和 0.14(95%CI,0.09-0.21)。

结论和相关性

对一种机器学习模型的前瞻性和多站点回顾性评估表明,该模型能够很好地区分成年患者入院时的住院死亡率。该模型的数据元素、方法和患者选择使其能够在系统层面上实施。

相似文献

1
Prospective and External Evaluation of a Machine Learning Model to Predict In-Hospital Mortality of Adults at Time of Admission.机器学习模型对入院时成人院内死亡率的前瞻性和外部评估。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Feb 5;3(2):e1920733. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.20733.
2
Early identification of patients admitted to hospital for covid-19 at risk of clinical deterioration: model development and multisite external validation study.因 COVID-19 住院的患者临床恶化风险的早期识别:模型的建立与多中心外部验证研究。
BMJ. 2022 Feb 17;376:e068576. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-068576.
3
Machine Learning to Predict Mortality and Critical Events in a Cohort of Patients With COVID-19 in New York City: Model Development and Validation.机器学习预测纽约市新冠肺炎患者队列中的死亡率和危急事件:模型开发与验证
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 6;22(11):e24018. doi: 10.2196/24018.
4
Dynamic and explainable machine learning prediction of mortality in patients in the intensive care unit: a retrospective study of high-frequency data in electronic patient records.动态可解释机器学习预测 ICU 患者死亡率:电子患者记录中高频数据的回顾性研究。
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Apr;2(4):e179-e191. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30018-2. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
5
Development and Validation of an Electronic Health Record-Based Machine Learning Model to Estimate Delirium Risk in Newly Hospitalized Patients Without Known Cognitive Impairment.基于电子病历的机器学习模型开发与验证:用于预测无已知认知障碍的新入院患者发生谵妄的风险。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Aug 3;1(4):e181018. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.1018.
6
Prediction of In-hospital Mortality in Emergency Department Patients With Sepsis: A Local Big Data-Driven, Machine Learning Approach.急诊科脓毒症患者院内死亡率的预测:一种基于本地大数据驱动的机器学习方法。
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Mar;23(3):269-78. doi: 10.1111/acem.12876. Epub 2016 Feb 13.
7
Development, implementation, and prospective validation of a model to predict 60-day end-of-life in hospitalized adults upon admission at three sites.在三个地点住院的成年人入院时预测 60 天内临终的模型的开发、实施和前瞻性验证。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Sep 7;20(1):214. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01235-6.
8
A simple real-time model for predicting acute kidney injury in hospitalized patients in the US: A descriptive modeling study.美国住院患者急性肾损伤的简单实时预测模型:描述性建模研究。
PLoS Med. 2019 Jul 15;16(7):e1002861. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002861. eCollection 2019 Jul.
9
Improving the Prognostic Evaluation Precision of Hospital Outcomes for Heart Failure Using Admission Notes and Clinical Tabular Data: Multimodal Deep Learning Model.利用入院记录和临床表格数据提高心力衰竭住院结局预后评估的精准度:多模态深度学习模型。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 May 2;26:e54363. doi: 10.2196/54363.
10
Development and Validation of Machine Learning Models to Predict Admission From Emergency Department to Inpatient and Intensive Care Units.开发和验证机器学习模型以预测从急诊科收治入院和进入重症监护病房。
Ann Emerg Med. 2021 Aug;78(2):290-302. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2021.02.029. Epub 2021 May 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Precision over quantity: identifying trustworthy genomic risk stratification models.精度优于数量:识别可靠的基因组风险分层模型。
Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2025 Aug 1;23:eCE1726. doi: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2025CE1726. eCollection 2025.
2
Development and validation of a transformer model-based early warning score for real-time prediction of adverse outcomes in the emergency department.基于变压器模型的急诊科不良结局实时预测预警评分的开发与验证
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 2;15(1):23021. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-07511-7.
3
Multicenter Validation of a Machine Learning Model for Surgical Transfusion Risk at 45 US Hospitals.

本文引用的文献

1
Artificial intelligence using deep learning to screen for referable and vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy in Africa: a clinical validation study.人工智能利用深度学习在非洲筛查可转诊和威胁视力的糖尿病视网膜病变:一项临床验证研究。
Lancet Digit Health. 2019 May;1(1):e35-e44. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(19)30004-4. Epub 2019 May 2.
2
Machine Learning Approaches to Predict 6-Month Mortality Among Patients With Cancer.机器学习方法预测癌症患者 6 个月死亡率。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Oct 2;2(10):e1915997. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.15997.
3
Pivotal trial of an autonomous AI-based diagnostic system for detection of diabetic retinopathy in primary care offices.
美国45家医院手术输血风险机器学习模型的多中心验证
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jun 2;8(6):e2517760. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.17760.
4
Evaluating sepsis watch generalizability through multisite external validation of a sepsis machine learning model.通过脓毒症机器学习模型的多中心外部验证评估脓毒症监测的可推广性。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Jun 11;8(1):350. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01664-5.
5
Using Machine Learning to Predict Uptake to an Online Self-Guided Intervention for Stress During the COVID-19 Pandemic.利用机器学习预测在新冠疫情期间对在线自我引导压力干预措施的接受度。
Stress Health. 2025 Apr;41(2):e70032. doi: 10.1002/smi.70032.
6
Increasing Advance Care Planning Discussions and Documentation.增加临终关怀规划讨论与记录。
J Adv Pract Oncol. 2025 Mar 16:1-7. doi: 10.6004/jadpro.2025.16.7.7.
7
Quality Improvement Study Using a Machine Learning Mortality Risk Prediction Model Notification System on Advance Care Planning in High-Risk Patients.使用机器学习死亡率风险预测模型通知系统对高危患者进行预先护理计划的质量改进研究。
J Brown Hosp Med. 2024 Jul 2;3(3):120907. doi: 10.56305/001c.120907. eCollection 2024.
8
Factors underpinning the performance of implemented artificial intelligence-based patient deterioration prediction systems: reasons for selection and implications for hospitals and researchers.已实施的基于人工智能的患者病情恶化预测系统性能的支撑因素:选择原因及对医院和研究人员的启示
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2025 Mar 1;32(3):492-509. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae321.
9
Comparing Single-Hospital and National Models to Predict 30-Day Inpatient Mortality.比较单医院模型和全国模型以预测30天住院死亡率。
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Mar;40(4):803-810. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-09315-3. Epub 2025 Jan 6.
10
The effect of resampling techniques on the performances of machine learning clinical risk prediction models in the setting of severe class imbalance: development and internal validation in a retrospective cohort.重采样技术对严重类别不平衡情况下机器学习临床风险预测模型性能的影响:一项回顾性队列研究中的开发与内部验证
Discov Artif Intell. 2024;4(1):91. doi: 10.1007/s44163-024-00199-0. Epub 2024 Nov 26.
在基层医疗诊所中用于检测糖尿病视网膜病变的基于人工智能的自主诊断系统的关键试验。
NPJ Digit Med. 2018 Aug 28;1:39. doi: 10.1038/s41746-018-0040-6. eCollection 2018.
4
Scalable and accurate deep learning with electronic health records.借助电子健康记录实现可扩展且准确的深度学习。
NPJ Digit Med. 2018 May 8;1:18. doi: 10.1038/s41746-018-0029-1. eCollection 2018.
5
Artificial Intelligence in Health Care: Will the Value Match the Hype?医疗保健中的人工智能:其价值能否与炒作相匹配?
JAMA. 2019 Jun 18;321(23):2281-2282. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.4914.
6
Reporting of artificial intelligence prediction models.人工智能预测模型的报告。
Lancet. 2019 Apr 20;393(10181):1577-1579. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30037-6.
7
Development and Application of a Machine Learning Approach to Assess Short-term Mortality Risk Among Patients With Cancer Starting Chemotherapy.开发和应用机器学习方法评估开始化疗的癌症患者的短期死亡风险。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Jul 6;1(3):e180926. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0926.
8
Development and validation of machine learning models to identify high-risk surgical patients using automatically curated electronic health record data (Pythia): A retrospective, single-site study.使用自动整理的电子健康记录数据(Pythia)开发和验证机器学习模型以识别高风险手术患者:一项回顾性、单站点研究。
PLoS Med. 2018 Nov 27;15(11):e1002701. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002701. eCollection 2018 Nov.
9
Two Decades Since To Err Is Human: An Assessment Of Progress And Emerging Priorities In Patient Safety.《人非圣贤,孰能无过:患者安全 20 年回顾与未来重点》
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Nov;37(11):1736-1743. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.0738.
10
Feasibility and patient acceptability of a novel artificial intelligence-based screening model for diabetic retinopathy at endocrinology outpatient services: a pilot study.基于新型人工智能的糖尿病视网膜病变筛查模型在内分泌科门诊服务中的可行性和患者可接受性:一项试点研究。
Sci Rep. 2018 Mar 12;8(1):4330. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-22612-2.