Randremanana Rindra Vatosoa, Raberahona Mihaja, Bourner Josephine, Rajerison Minoarisoa, Edwards Tansy, Randriamparany Ravaka, Fehizoro Razafindratsinana Tsinjo, Razananaivo Lisy Hanitra, Zadonirina Gabriella, Mayouya-Gamana Théodora, Salam Alex Paddy Abdel, Mangahasimbola Reziky Tiandraza, Andrianaivoarimanana Voahangy, Pesonel Elise, Rakotoarivelo Rivonirina Andry, Randria Mamy Jean de Dieu, Horby Peter, Olliaro Piero
Institut Pasteur de Madagascar, Antananarivo.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Joseph Raseta Befelatanana, Antananarivo, Madagascar.
N Engl J Med. 2025 Aug 7;393(6):544-555. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2413772.
Plague is a high-consequence infectious disease with epidemic potential. Current treatment guidelines are based on weak evidence.
We enrolled persons (excluding pregnant persons) in Madagascar who had clinically suspected bubonic plague during 2020-2024. Using an open-label noninferiority design, we compared two treatments included in the national plague guidelines: oral ciprofloxacin for 10 days (ciprofloxacin monotherapy) or injectable aminoglycoside for 3 days followed by oral ciprofloxacin for 7 days (aminoglycoside-ciprofloxacin). The primary end point was treatment failure on day 11, with treatment failure defined as death, fever, secondary pneumonic plague, or alternative or prolonged plague treatment. To show noninferiority of ciprofloxacin monotherapy among patients with laboratory-confirmed or probable infections, the upper boundary of the 95% confidence interval around the risk difference had to be less than 15 percentage points.
A total of 933 patients underwent screening; 450 patients with suspected bubonic plague were enrolled and underwent randomization. A total of 220 patients (110 per group) had confirmed infection, and 2 (1 per group) had probable infection. Of the patients who underwent randomization, 53.2% were male, and the median age was 14 years (range, 2 to 72). Ciprofloxacin monotherapy was noninferior to aminoglycoside-ciprofloxacin therapy: among the patients with confirmed or probable infection, treatment failure occurred in 9.0% (10 of 111 patients) in the ciprofloxacin monotherapy group and 8.1% (9 of 111 patients) in the aminoglycoside-ciprofloxacin group (difference, 0.9 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, -6.0 to 7.8). Noninferiority was consistent in other prespecified analysis populations. A total of 5 patients in the ciprofloxacin monotherapy group and 4 patients in the aminoglycoside-ciprofloxacin group died, and secondary pneumonic plague developed in 3 patients in each group. The incidence of adverse events among patients with confirmed or probable infections was similar in the two groups - 18.0% in the ciprofloxacin monotherapy group and 18.9% in the aminoglycoside-ciprofloxacin group had adverse events, and 7.2% and 5.4%, respectively, had serious adverse events.
Oral ciprofloxacin monotherapy for 10 days was noninferior to an aminoglycoside-ciprofloxacin sequential combination for the treatment of patients with bubonic plague. (Funded by the U.K. Foreign, Commonwealth, and Development Office and Wellcome; IMASOY ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04110340.).
鼠疫是一种具有流行潜力的高后果传染病。当前的治疗指南证据不足。
我们纳入了2020年至2024年期间在马达加斯加临床疑似腺鼠疫的患者(不包括孕妇)。采用开放标签非劣效性设计,我们比较了国家鼠疫指南中的两种治疗方法:口服环丙沙星10天(环丙沙星单药治疗)或注射用氨基糖苷类药物3天,随后口服环丙沙星7天(氨基糖苷类 - 环丙沙星联合治疗)。主要终点是第11天的治疗失败,治疗失败定义为死亡、发热、继发性肺鼠疫或替代或延长的鼠疫治疗。为了显示环丙沙星单药治疗在实验室确诊或疑似感染患者中的非劣效性,风险差异的95%置信区间的上限必须小于15个百分点。
共有933名患者接受筛查;450名疑似腺鼠疫患者入组并进行随机分组。共有220名患者(每组110名)确诊感染,2名患者(每组1名)疑似感染。在接受随机分组的患者中,53.2%为男性,中位年龄为14岁(范围为2至72岁)。环丙沙星单药治疗不劣于氨基糖苷类 - 环丙沙星联合治疗:在确诊或疑似感染的患者中,环丙沙星单药治疗组9.0%(111名患者中的10名)出现治疗失败,氨基糖苷类 - 环丙沙星联合治疗组8.1%(111名患者中的9名)出现治疗失败(差异为0.9个百分点;95%置信区间为 -6.0至7.8)。在其他预先指定的分析人群中,非劣效性一致。环丙沙星单药治疗组有5名患者死亡,氨基糖苷类 - 环丙沙星联合治疗组有4名患者死亡,每组有3名患者发生继发性肺鼠疫。两组确诊或疑似感染患者的不良事件发生率相似——环丙沙星单药治疗组18.0%、氨基糖苷类 - 环丙沙星联合治疗组18.9%出现不良事件,分别有7.2%和5.4%出现严重不良事件。
口服环丙沙星单药治疗10天在治疗腺鼠疫患者方面不劣于氨基糖苷类 - 环丙沙星序贯联合治疗。(由英国外交、联邦和发展办公室以及惠康基金会资助;IMASOY ClinicalTrials.gov编号,NCT04110340。)