• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用术前因素对非心脏手术术中高血压变异性进行机器学习预测与解释。

Machine learning prediction and explanation of high intraoperative blood pressure variability for noncardiac surgery using preoperative factors.

作者信息

Zhang Zheng, Duan Yi, Li Zuozhi, Gao Zhifeng, Zhang Huan

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 102218, China.

Department of Cardiology, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

出版信息

BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 Aug 6;25(1):581. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-05026-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12872-025-05026-7
PMID:40770682
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12326602/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study is to construct an explainable machine learning predictive model for high intraoperative blood pressure variability(IBPV) based on preoperative characteristics, to enhance intraoperative circulatory management and surgical outcomes. This study utilized a retrospective observational design, employing the eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithm to create a predictive model for high IBPV.

METHOD

The data for the study were obtained from the central operating room of a major hospital in Beijing, China, covering the period from March 2016 to April 2022. A total of 37,756 noncardiac surgeries were included in the analysis. The dataset comprised demographic, preoperative laboratory, and diagnostic information. Selection criteria included all noncardiac surgeries with complete preoperative data. High IBPV was defined as a coefficient of variation exceeding 20% during the surgical procedure. The main outcome measure was the prediction of high IBPV, assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, and specificity.

RESULTS

The XGBoost-based model achieved an accuracy of 0.81 and a specificity of 0.99, with a moderate discriminative ability (AUC = 0.60). SHAP analysis identified age and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification as the top positive predictors for high IBPV, with maximum SHAP values of 0.4 and 0.2, respectively. Preoperative plasma albumin level was the key negative predictor, with a maximum SHAP value of -0.6. Interactions between preoperative blood calcium and age, and weight and age, were also influential. The model quantified individual high IBPV risk probabilities and variable contributions.

CONCLUSIONS

The XGBoost model effectively identifies significant predictors of high IBPV, including age, ASA classification, and plasma albumin levels, and is capable of estimating individual risk probabilities. However, external validation of the model in different clinical settings and populations is needed to further confirm its predictive performance and generalizability.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT05698433.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12872-025-05026-7.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是基于术前特征构建一个可解释的机器学习预测模型,用于预测术中高血压变异性(IBPV),以加强术中循环管理并改善手术结果。本研究采用回顾性观察设计,运用极端梯度提升(XGBoost)算法创建高IBPV预测模型。

方法

本研究的数据来自中国北京一家大型医院的中心手术室,涵盖2016年3月至2022年4月期间。分析共纳入37756例非心脏手术。数据集包括人口统计学、术前实验室检查和诊断信息。入选标准为所有术前数据完整的非心脏手术。高IBPV定义为手术过程中变异系数超过20%。主要结局指标是高IBPV的预测,采用受试者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)、准确率和特异性进行评估。

结果

基于XGBoost的模型准确率为0.81,特异性为0.99,具有中等判别能力(AUC = 0.60)。SHAP分析确定年龄和美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级是高IBPV的前两大正向预测因素,最大SHAP值分别为0.4和0.2。术前血浆白蛋白水平是关键的负向预测因素,最大SHAP值为 -0.6。术前血钙与年龄、体重与年龄之间的相互作用也有影响。该模型量化了个体高IBPV风险概率和变量贡献。

结论

XGBoost模型有效地识别了高IBPV的重要预测因素,包括年龄、ASA分级和血浆白蛋白水平,并能够估计个体风险概率。然而,需要在不同临床环境和人群中对该模型进行外部验证,以进一步确认其预测性能和通用性。

试验注册

NCT05698433。

补充信息

在线版本包含可在10.1186/s12872-025-05026-7获取的补充材料。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/080f/12326602/f2161905c41e/12872_2025_5026_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/080f/12326602/8cddf523578e/12872_2025_5026_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/080f/12326602/28732a222241/12872_2025_5026_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/080f/12326602/ab32379a4b4f/12872_2025_5026_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/080f/12326602/8267637eef45/12872_2025_5026_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/080f/12326602/f2161905c41e/12872_2025_5026_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/080f/12326602/8cddf523578e/12872_2025_5026_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/080f/12326602/28732a222241/12872_2025_5026_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/080f/12326602/ab32379a4b4f/12872_2025_5026_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/080f/12326602/8267637eef45/12872_2025_5026_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/080f/12326602/f2161905c41e/12872_2025_5026_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Machine learning prediction and explanation of high intraoperative blood pressure variability for noncardiac surgery using preoperative factors.使用术前因素对非心脏手术术中高血压变异性进行机器学习预测与解释。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 Aug 6;25(1):581. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-05026-7.
2
Identifying patterns of high intraoperative blood pressure variability in noncardiac surgery using explainable machine learning: a retrospective cohort study.使用可解释机器学习识别非心脏手术中术中血压高变异性模式:一项回顾性队列研究。
Ann Med. 2025 Dec;57(1):2537920. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2025.2537920. Epub 2025 Jul 24.
3
A Responsible Framework for Assessing, Selecting, and Explaining Machine Learning Models in Cardiovascular Disease Outcomes Among People With Type 2 Diabetes: Methodology and Validation Study.用于评估、选择和解释2型糖尿病患者心血管疾病结局机器学习模型的责任框架:方法与验证研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2025 Jun 27;13:e66200. doi: 10.2196/66200.
4
Development and validation of a machine learning-based model for perioperative stroke prediction in noncardiac, nonvascular, and nonneurosurgical patients.基于机器学习的非心脏、非血管和非神经外科手术患者围手术期卒中预测模型的开发与验证
Front Physiol. 2025 Jun 20;16:1624898. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1624898. eCollection 2025.
5
Prediction of lactate concentrations after cardiac surgery using machine learning and deep learning approaches.使用机器学习和深度学习方法预测心脏手术后的乳酸浓度。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Sep 14;10:1165912. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1165912. eCollection 2023.
6
Risk Prediction of Diabetic Foot Amputation Using Machine Learning and Explainable Artificial Intelligence.使用机器学习和可解释人工智能对糖尿病足截肢进行风险预测
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Jan 30:19322968241228606. doi: 10.1177/19322968241228606.
7
Learning-based early detection of post-hepatectomy liver failure using temporal perioperative data: a nationwide multicenter retrospective study in China.利用围手术期时间数据基于学习的肝切除术后肝衰竭早期检测:中国一项全国性多中心回顾性研究
EClinicalMedicine. 2025 May 6;83:103220. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103220. eCollection 2025 May.
8
Intraoperative hypotension prediction in cardiac and noncardiac procedures: is HPI truly worthwhile? A systematic review and meta-analysis.心脏手术和非心脏手术中的术中低血压预测:高敏肌钙蛋白I(HPI)真的值得吗?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Jul 31;25(1):388. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-03250-4.
9
External validation of a machine learning prediction model for massive blood loss during surgery for spinal metastases: a multi-institutional study using 880 patients.脊柱转移瘤手术中大量失血的机器学习预测模型的外部验证:一项使用880例患者的多机构研究。
Spine J. 2025 Jul;25(7):1386-1399. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2025.03.018. Epub 2025 Mar 27.
10
Coronary heart disease increases the risk of perioperative ischemic stroke after noncardiac surgery: A retrospective cohort study.冠心病增加非心脏手术后围手术期缺血性卒中的风险:一项回顾性队列研究。
CNS Neurosci Ther. 2024 Aug;30(8):e14912. doi: 10.1111/cns.14912.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk factors of major bleeding detected by machine learning method in patients undergoing liver resection with controlled low central venous pressure technique.采用机器学习方法检测接受控制性低中心静脉压技术肝切除术患者的主要出血风险因素。
Postgrad Med J. 2023 Nov 20;99(1178):1280-1286. doi: 10.1093/postmj/qgad087.
2
Machine learning using the extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) algorithm predicts 5-day delta of SOFA score at ICU admission in COVID-19 patients.使用极端梯度提升(XGBoost)算法的机器学习可预测新冠肺炎患者入住重症监护病房(ICU)时序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分的5天变化值。
J Intensive Med. 2021 Oct 22;1(2):110-116. doi: 10.1016/j.jointm.2021.09.002. eCollection 2021 Oct.
3
Very short-term beat-by-beat blood pressure variability in the supine position at rest correlates well with the nocturnal blood pressure variability assessed by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.
静息仰卧位时极短期逐搏血压变异性与通过动态血压监测评估的夜间血压变异性密切相关。
Hypertens Res. 2022 Jun;45(6):1008-1017. doi: 10.1038/s41440-022-00911-6. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
4
The impact of intraoperative blood pressure variability on the risk of postoperative adverse outcomes in non-cardiac surgery: a systematic review.术中血压变异性对非心脏手术术后不良结局风险的影响:系统评价。
J Anesth. 2022 Apr;36(2):316-322. doi: 10.1007/s00540-022-03035-w. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
5
Explanation of machine learning models using shapley additive explanation and application for real data in hospital.使用 Shapley 加法解释对机器学习模型进行解释,并将其应用于医院的真实数据。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2022 Feb;214:106584. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106584. Epub 2021 Dec 10.
6
Blood pressure variability during pediatric cardiac surgery is associated with acute kidney injury.小儿心脏手术期间的血压变异性与急性肾损伤有关。
Pediatr Nephrol. 2022 Apr;37(4):871-879. doi: 10.1007/s00467-021-05234-1. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
7
Obesity and Cardiovascular Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.肥胖与心血管疾病:美国心脏协会科学声明
Circulation. 2021 May 25;143(21):e984-e1010. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000973. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
8
Development of machine learning model for diagnostic disease prediction based on laboratory tests.基于实验室检查的机器学习模型在疾病诊断预测中的开发。
Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 7;11(1):7567. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87171-5.
9
Visit-to-Visit Blood Pressure Variability and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者就诊间血压变异性与临床结局
Hypertension. 2021 May 5;77(5):1549-1558. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.16757. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
10
Vitamin D, Calcium Supplements, and Implications for Cardiovascular Health: JACC Focus Seminar.维生素 D、钙补充剂与心血管健康的关系:美国心脏病学会焦点研讨会
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Feb 2;77(4):437-449. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.09.617.